Udělej nejlepší investice svého života
Za 2 eura si zabezpečte Dánsko Žádosti o azyl
Kurz
Aktuální hodnota Žádosti o azyl v Dánsko je 155 persons. Žádosti o azyl v Dánsko klesly na 155 persons dne 1. 8. 2024, poté co byly 165 persons dne 1. 7. 2024. Od 1. 1. 2008 do 1. 9. 2024 byl průměrný HDP v Dánsko 451,14 persons. Historického maxima bylo dosaženo dne 1. 11. 2015 s hodnotou 5 020,00 persons, zatímco nejnižší hodnota byla zaznamenána dne 1. 4. 2020 s hodnotou 35,00 persons.
Žádosti o azyl ·
3 roky
5 let
10 let
25 let
Max
Žádosti o azyl | |
---|---|
1. 1. 2008 | 235,00 persons |
1. 2. 2008 | 165,00 persons |
1. 3. 2008 | 130,00 persons |
1. 4. 2008 | 160,00 persons |
1. 5. 2008 | 155,00 persons |
1. 6. 2008 | 145,00 persons |
1. 7. 2008 | 130,00 persons |
1. 8. 2008 | 210,00 persons |
1. 9. 2008 | 250,00 persons |
1. 10. 2008 | 245,00 persons |
1. 11. 2008 | 275,00 persons |
1. 12. 2008 | 245,00 persons |
1. 1. 2009 | 335,00 persons |
1. 2. 2009 | 260,00 persons |
1. 3. 2009 | 340,00 persons |
1. 4. 2009 | 215,00 persons |
1. 5. 2009 | 300,00 persons |
1. 6. 2009 | 205,00 persons |
1. 7. 2009 | 225,00 persons |
1. 8. 2009 | 315,00 persons |
1. 9. 2009 | 375,00 persons |
1. 10. 2009 | 355,00 persons |
1. 11. 2009 | 410,00 persons |
1. 12. 2009 | 385,00 persons |
1. 1. 2010 | 405,00 persons |
1. 2. 2010 | 420,00 persons |
1. 3. 2010 | 390,00 persons |
1. 4. 2010 | 370,00 persons |
1. 5. 2010 | 390,00 persons |
1. 6. 2010 | 320,00 persons |
1. 7. 2010 | 370,00 persons |
1. 8. 2010 | 535,00 persons |
1. 9. 2010 | 455,00 persons |
1. 10. 2010 | 540,00 persons |
1. 11. 2010 | 425,00 persons |
1. 12. 2010 | 440,00 persons |
1. 1. 2011 | 360,00 persons |
1. 2. 2011 | 280,00 persons |
1. 3. 2011 | 315,00 persons |
1. 4. 2011 | 285,00 persons |
1. 5. 2011 | 290,00 persons |
1. 6. 2011 | 270,00 persons |
1. 7. 2011 | 260,00 persons |
1. 8. 2011 | 300,00 persons |
1. 9. 2011 | 355,00 persons |
1. 10. 2011 | 430,00 persons |
1. 11. 2011 | 380,00 persons |
1. 12. 2011 | 420,00 persons |
1. 1. 2012 | 395,00 persons |
1. 2. 2012 | 315,00 persons |
1. 3. 2012 | 455,00 persons |
1. 4. 2012 | 440,00 persons |
1. 5. 2012 | 415,00 persons |
1. 6. 2012 | 615,00 persons |
1. 7. 2012 | 560,00 persons |
1. 8. 2012 | 490,00 persons |
1. 9. 2012 | 515,00 persons |
1. 10. 2012 | 610,00 persons |
1. 11. 2012 | 640,00 persons |
1. 12. 2012 | 595,00 persons |
1. 1. 2013 | 745,00 persons |
1. 2. 2013 | 545,00 persons |
1. 3. 2013 | 575,00 persons |
1. 4. 2013 | 535,00 persons |
1. 5. 2013 | 475,00 persons |
1. 6. 2013 | 500,00 persons |
1. 7. 2013 | 610,00 persons |
1. 8. 2013 | 670,00 persons |
1. 9. 2013 | 645,00 persons |
1. 10. 2013 | 710,00 persons |
1. 11. 2013 | 635,00 persons |
1. 12. 2013 | 520,00 persons |
1. 1. 2014 | 555,00 persons |
1. 2. 2014 | 425,00 persons |
1. 3. 2014 | 500,00 persons |
1. 4. 2014 | 590,00 persons |
1. 5. 2014 | 710,00 persons |
1. 6. 2014 | 1 000,00 persons |
1. 7. 2014 | 1 700,00 persons |
1. 8. 2014 | 2 290,00 persons |
1. 9. 2014 | 3 065,00 persons |
1. 10. 2014 | 1 840,00 persons |
1. 11. 2014 | 1 105,00 persons |
1. 12. 2014 | 755,00 persons |
1. 1. 2015 | 630,00 persons |
1. 2. 2015 | 425,00 persons |
1. 3. 2015 | 450,00 persons |
1. 4. 2015 | 545,00 persons |
1. 5. 2015 | 870,00 persons |
1. 6. 2015 | 1 075,00 persons |
1. 7. 2015 | 1 030,00 persons |
1. 8. 2015 | 1 810,00 persons |
1. 9. 2015 | 2 680,00 persons |
1. 10. 2015 | 3 625,00 persons |
1. 11. 2015 | 5 020,00 persons |
1. 12. 2015 | 2 665,00 persons |
1. 1. 2016 | 1 625,00 persons |
1. 2. 2016 | 900,00 persons |
1. 3. 2016 | 460,00 persons |
1. 4. 2016 | 395,00 persons |
1. 5. 2016 | 360,00 persons |
1. 6. 2016 | 465,00 persons |
1. 7. 2016 | 395,00 persons |
1. 8. 2016 | 285,00 persons |
1. 9. 2016 | 295,00 persons |
1. 10. 2016 | 340,00 persons |
1. 11. 2016 | 275,00 persons |
1. 12. 2016 | 255,00 persons |
1. 1. 2017 | 220,00 persons |
1. 2. 2017 | 205,00 persons |
1. 3. 2017 | 245,00 persons |
1. 4. 2017 | 235,00 persons |
1. 5. 2017 | 280,00 persons |
1. 6. 2017 | 290,00 persons |
1. 7. 2017 | 300,00 persons |
1. 8. 2017 | 300,00 persons |
1. 9. 2017 | 310,00 persons |
1. 10. 2017 | 275,00 persons |
1. 11. 2017 | 260,00 persons |
1. 12. 2017 | 210,00 persons |
1. 1. 2018 | 275,00 persons |
1. 2. 2018 | 265,00 persons |
1. 3. 2018 | 260,00 persons |
1. 4. 2018 | 245,00 persons |
1. 5. 2018 | 275,00 persons |
1. 6. 2018 | 250,00 persons |
1. 7. 2018 | 345,00 persons |
1. 8. 2018 | 380,00 persons |
1. 9. 2018 | 355,00 persons |
1. 10. 2018 | 340,00 persons |
1. 11. 2018 | 295,00 persons |
1. 12. 2018 | 180,00 persons |
1. 1. 2019 | 230,00 persons |
1. 2. 2019 | 210,00 persons |
1. 3. 2019 | 210,00 persons |
1. 4. 2019 | 195,00 persons |
1. 5. 2019 | 220,00 persons |
1. 6. 2019 | 200,00 persons |
1. 7. 2019 | 220,00 persons |
1. 8. 2019 | 230,00 persons |
1. 9. 2019 | 235,00 persons |
1. 10. 2019 | 265,00 persons |
1. 11. 2019 | 195,00 persons |
1. 12. 2019 | 190,00 persons |
1. 1. 2020 | 195,00 persons |
1. 2. 2020 | 160,00 persons |
1. 3. 2020 | 105,00 persons |
1. 4. 2020 | 35,00 persons |
1. 5. 2020 | 45,00 persons |
1. 6. 2020 | 100,00 persons |
1. 7. 2020 | 120,00 persons |
1. 8. 2020 | 130,00 persons |
1. 9. 2020 | 150,00 persons |
1. 10. 2020 | 145,00 persons |
1. 11. 2020 | 135,00 persons |
1. 12. 2020 | 100,00 persons |
1. 1. 2021 | 90,00 persons |
1. 2. 2021 | 105,00 persons |
1. 3. 2021 | 185,00 persons |
1. 4. 2021 | 100,00 persons |
1. 5. 2021 | 105,00 persons |
1. 6. 2021 | 120,00 persons |
1. 7. 2021 | 90,00 persons |
1. 8. 2021 | 165,00 persons |
1. 9. 2021 | 250,00 persons |
1. 10. 2021 | 265,00 persons |
1. 11. 2021 | 300,00 persons |
1. 12. 2021 | 225,00 persons |
1. 1. 2022 | 125,00 persons |
1. 2. 2022 | 190,00 persons |
1. 3. 2022 | 2 375,00 persons |
1. 4. 2022 | 160,00 persons |
1. 5. 2022 | 160,00 persons |
1. 6. 2022 | 165,00 persons |
1. 7. 2022 | 170,00 persons |
1. 8. 2022 | 205,00 persons |
1. 9. 2022 | 210,00 persons |
1. 10. 2022 | 260,00 persons |
1. 11. 2022 | 245,00 persons |
1. 12. 2022 | 205,00 persons |
1. 1. 2023 | 210,00 persons |
1. 2. 2023 | 250,00 persons |
1. 3. 2023 | 185,00 persons |
1. 4. 2023 | 180,00 persons |
1. 5. 2023 | 175,00 persons |
1. 6. 2023 | 185,00 persons |
1. 7. 2023 | 185,00 persons |
1. 8. 2023 | 245,00 persons |
1. 9. 2023 | 175,00 persons |
1. 10. 2023 | 220,00 persons |
1. 11. 2023 | 200,00 persons |
1. 12. 2023 | 145,00 persons |
1. 1. 2024 | 220,00 persons |
1. 2. 2024 | 160,00 persons |
1. 3. 2024 | 135,00 persons |
1. 4. 2024 | 175,00 persons |
1. 5. 2024 | 155,00 persons |
1. 6. 2024 | 170,00 persons |
1. 7. 2024 | 165,00 persons |
1. 8. 2024 | 155,00 persons |
Žádosti o azyl Historie
Datum | Hodnota |
---|---|
1. 8. 2024 | 155 persons |
1. 7. 2024 | 165 persons |
1. 6. 2024 | 170 persons |
1. 5. 2024 | 155 persons |
1. 4. 2024 | 175 persons |
1. 3. 2024 | 135 persons |
1. 2. 2024 | 160 persons |
1. 1. 2024 | 220 persons |
1. 12. 2023 | 145 persons |
1. 11. 2023 | 200 persons |
Podobné makroekonomické ukazatele k Žádosti o azyl
Jméno | Aktuálně | Předchozí | Frekvence |
---|---|---|---|
🇩🇰 Dluh státu k HDP | 29,3 % of GDP | 29,8 % of GDP | Ročně |
🇩🇰 Hodnota státního rozpočtu | 6,655 mld. DKK | 25,684 mld. DKK | čtvrtletí |
🇩🇰 Index korupce | 90 Points | 90 Points | Ročně |
🇩🇰 Korupční index | 1 | 1 | Ročně |
🇩🇰 Státní dluh | 646,433 mld. DKK | 642,371 mld. DKK | Měsíčně |
🇩🇰 Státní příjmy | 369,891 mld. DKK | 359,643 mld. DKK | čtvrtletí |
🇩🇰 Státní rozpočet | 3,1 % of GDP | 3,3 % of GDP | Ročně |
🇩🇰 Státní výdaje | 349,717 mld. DKK | 320,395 mld. DKK | čtvrtletí |
🇩🇰 Vojenské výdaje | 8,145 mld. USD | 5,475 mld. USD | Ročně |
🇩🇰 Výdaje státu | 148 mil. DKK | 146,3 mil. DKK | čtvrtletí |
🇩🇰 Výdaje státu k HDP | 46,8 % of GDP | 44,9 % of GDP | Ročně |
Žádost o azyl na této stránce se týká žadatelů o azyl poprvé. Data jsou poskytována společnosti Eulerpool organizací Eurostat, národními ministerstvy vnitra a jinými oficiálními agenturami.
Makrostránky pro ostatní země v Evropa
- 🇦🇱Albánie
- 🇦🇹Rakousko
- 🇧🇾Bělorusko
- 🇧🇪Belgie
- 🇧🇦Bosna a Hercegovina
- 🇧🇬Bulharsko
- 🇭🇷Chorvatsko
- 🇨🇾Kypr
- 🇨🇿Česká republika
- 🇪🇪Estonsko
- 🇫🇴Faerské ostrovy
- 🇫🇮Finsko
- 🇫🇷Francie
- 🇩🇪Německo
- 🇬🇷Řecko
- 🇭🇺Maďarsko
- 🇮🇸Island
- 🇮🇪Irsko
- 🇮🇹Itálie
- 🇽🇰Kosovo
- 🇱🇻Lotyšsko
- 🇱🇮Lichtenštejnsko
- 🇱🇹Litva
- 🇱🇺Lucembursko
- 🇲🇰Severní Makedonie
- 🇲🇹Malta
- 🇲🇩Vltava
- 🇲🇨Monako
- 🇲🇪Montenegro
- 🇳🇱Nizozemsko
- 🇳🇴Norsko
- 🇵🇱Polsko
- 🇵🇹Portugalsko
- 🇷🇴Rumunsko
- 🇷🇺Rusko
- 🇷🇸Srbsko
- 🇸🇰Slovensko
- 🇸🇮Slovinsko
- 🇪🇸Španělsko
- 🇸🇪Švédsko
- 🇨🇭Švýcarsko
- 🇺🇦Ukrajina
- 🇬🇧Spojené království
- 🇦🇩Andorra
Co je Žádosti o azyl
Asylum Applications, also known as "žádosti o azyl," constitute a significant segment of macroeconomic data that reveals a plethora of information about socio-political and economic conditions both within and outside of the Czech Republic. At Eulerpool, we pride ourselves on providing comprehensive and precise macroeconomic data, and in this context, the examination of Asylum Applications is crucial for a multifaceted understanding of global and national trends. Understanding the dynamics of Asylum Applications in the Czech Republic offers a lens through which we can analyze several macroeconomic indicators. Asylum seekers, or "žadatelé o azyl," are individuals who have fled their home countries due to persecution, conflict, or severe instability. This phenomenon directly ties into various social, economic, and political factors that influence the overall stability and development of a nation. To begin with, the volume of Asylum Applications can serve as an indicator of geopolitical unrest in specific regions. Countries experiencing conflict, human rights violations, or economic collapse often see their citizens seeking refuge in more stable territories, including the Czech Republic. Data on Asylum Applications broken down by the country of origin can illuminate which regions are undergoing severe duress and can also help in predicting potential future migration trends. Furthermore, trends in Asylum Applications in the Czech Republic can also reflect domestic economic and social policies. For instance, fluctuations in the number of applications may correlate with changes in visa regulations, border control policies, and the overall political climate. Policy reforms aimed at tightening or loosening immigration controls can have immediate and noticeable impacts on the inflow of asylum seekers. Therefore, monitoring these numbers can provide insights into the effectiveness and reach of the Czech Republic's immigration policies. From an economic perspective, the integration of asylum seekers has both short-term and long-term effects on the economy. Initial stages typically involve costs related to housing, legal proceedings, and social services. However, with proper integration programs, asylum seekers can contribute economically through labor force participation, consumption, and even entrepreneurial activities. Assessing the macroeconomic impact of Asylum Applications thus requires a nuanced understanding of labor market absorption, social integration policies, and economic contribution levels. Moreover, the processing of Asylum Applications also has bureaucratic and resource-based implications for the host country. The efficiency of the asylum system in handling these applications, including the legal proceedings and overall support systems in place, plays a pivotal role. Delays and backlogs can not only strain public resources but also have human costs, affecting the welfare of asylum seekers. The demographic profile of asylum seekers is another pivotal aspect of analysis. Age, gender, education level, and professional experience of asylum applicants provide valuable data points. Younger and more educated individuals might assimilate more easily into the workforce, thereby presenting opportunities for economic gain. Conversely, the presence of dependents—such as minors and elderly relatives—might necessitate a different set of social support requirements, impacting overall public expenditure. Additionally, the public perception and societal response to asylum seekers in the Czech Republic are factors that influence broader macroeconomic conditions. Societal attitudes towards immigration can affect policy decisions, which in turn impacts future inflows of asylum applications. Public sentiment may also influence market conditions, consumer behavior, and the political landscape, which together drive macroeconomic outcomes. It is also essential to consider the international context when studying Asylum Applications within the Czech Republic. The country’s participation in international frameworks, such as the European Union's Common European Asylum System (CEAS), underscores its commitment to shared responsibilities and standards in handling asylum seekers. Compliance with international regulations and agreements can foster international cooperation and reflect on the country’s global standing and fund allocations. In essence, the asylum-seeking process is not just a humanitarian issue but a complex macroeconomic phenomenon that intertwines various facets of national and international policy, economic performance, social integration, and public sentiment. Eulerpool aims to provide thorough and precise data, empowering stakeholders to make informed decisions based on robust macroeconomic analyses. The dynamic interplay of these factors underscores the importance of monitoring Asylum Applications as a vital statistic within the realm of macroeconomic data. To summarize, Asylum Applications offer deep insights into both global and domestic macroeconomic conditions. By tracking and analyzing these applications, we can gain valuable insights into geopolitical instability, regional crises, domestic policy impacts, labor market dynamics, social integration, public sentiment, and international cooperation frameworks. This comprehensive analysis provides a holistic view of how Asylum Applications as a category of macroeconomic data can influence and reflect broader economic and social trends. At Eulerpool, we are committed to delivering the highest standards of data accuracy and relevance to support informed decision-making processes.