Pfizer versus Eli Lilly: Who is the Better Buy for Price-Conscious Investors?

  • Eli Lilly shows strong growth thanks to innovative drugs, but is highly valued.
  • Pfizer is struggling with a sharp drop in profits, but offers long-term opportunities at a low valuation.

Eulerpool News·

In the current stock market, particularly in the biopharma sector, value-oriented investors are increasingly seeking undervalued gems. However, industry heavyweights such as Pfizer and Eli Lilly do not immediately present themselves as bargain opportunities. Nonetheless, upon closer examination, these two pharma giants are not to be evaluated equally when it comes to investor potential. Pfizer is currently in a crisis when comparing the latest figures to past successes. The company's operating profit is currently just $1.3 billion, representing a dramatic decline of 94% compared to three years ago. The decline in sales of COVID-19 vaccines and medications has hit the company hard. This situation is also reflected in valuation metrics: the enterprise value-to-revenue ratio is 4.1 and the price-to-book ratio stands at 1.9. These figures suggest that investors are rather skeptical about Pfizer's future prospects. However, Wall Street analysts anticipate that Pfizer could achieve an annual earnings per share growth of 9.6% in the long term, even though a period of stagnation is expected in the short term. Operational improvements and strategic acquisitions, particularly in the field of cancer therapies, could help restore Pfizer's balance sheet. Considering the currently low valuation, Pfizer's stocks might represent an attractive opportunity for patient investors. In contrast, Eli Lilly presents itself as a growth marvel in the sector, bolstered by groundbreaking drugs for type 2 diabetes and obesity. Products like Mounjaro and Zepbound have proven to be bestsellers, leading to a 60% increase in earnings per share over three years. Eli Lilly's impressive growth forecast justifies the high valuation figures: an EV/revenue ratio of 21.8 and a price-earnings ratio of 112.7 speak for themselves. The company’s pipeline is promisingly filled, offering investors hope for further growth. Even though Eli Lilly is significantly more expensive, the investment could pay off in the long term. For risk-averse investors, Pfizer might be the better choice, as the low valuation holds potential for gains once the company restores its profitability. Those looking to enter the pharma market should be aware of both the opportunities and the risks – both companies represent different approaches and expectations.
EULERPOOL DATA & ANALYTICS

Make smarter decisions faster with the world's premier financial data

Eulerpool Data & Analytics