Tee elämäsi parhaat sijoitukset

Alkaen 2 euroa
Analyse
Profiili
🇫🇮

Suomi Eläkeikä miehet

Osakekurssi

64,25 Vuosis
Muutos +/-
+0,25 Vuosis
Muutos %
+0,39 %

Nykyinen arvo termille Eläkeikä miehet maassa Suomi on 64,25 Vuosis. Eläkeikä miehet maassa Suomi nousi arvoon 64,25 Vuosis päivämääränä 1.1.2023, kun se oli ollut 64 Vuosis päivämääränä 1.1.2022. Välillä 1.1.2009 ja 1.1.2024, BKT:n keskiarvo maassa Suomi oli 63,39 Vuosis. Koko historian korkein arvo saavutettiin 1.1.2024 luvulla 64,50 Vuosis, kun taas alin arvo kirjattiin 1.1.2009 luvulla 63,00 Vuosis.

Lähde: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health

Eläkeikä miehet

  • 3 vuotta

  • 5 vuotta

  • 10 vuotta

  • 25 vuotta

  • Max

Eläkeikäiset miehet

Eläkeikä miehet Historia

PäivämääräArvo
1.1.202364,25 Vuosis
1.1.202264 Vuosis
1.1.202164 Vuosis
1.1.202063,75 Vuosis
1.1.201963,5 Vuosis
1.1.201863,25 Vuosis
1.1.201763 Vuosis
1.1.201663 Vuosis
1.1.201563 Vuosis
1.1.201463 Vuosis
1
2

Vastaavia makrotalouden tunnuslukuja Eläkeikä miehet

NimiTällä hetkelläEdellinenTaajuus
🇫🇮
Avoimet työpaikat
40 343 50 890 Kuukausittain
🇫🇮
Eläkeikä naiset
64,5 Years64,25 YearsVuosittain
🇫🇮
kokopäivätyö
2,024 milj. 2,035 milj. Kvartaali
🇫🇮
nuorisotyöttömyysaste
30,3 %24,7 %Kuukausittain
🇫🇮
Osa-aikatyö
432 000 449 400 Kvartaali
🇫🇮
Ostoaste
70,9 %68,7 %Kuukausittain
🇫🇮
Palkat
4 018 EUR/Month3 993 EUR/MonthKvartaali
🇫🇮
Palkkakasvu
2,3 %2,2 %Kvartaali
🇫🇮
Pitkäaikaistyöttömyysaste
1,7 %1,7 %Kvartaali
🇫🇮
Tuottavuus
102,895 points102,346 pointsKvartaali
🇫🇮
Työkustannukset
116,133 points115,125 pointsKvartaali
🇫🇮
Työllisyysaste
73,2 %71,7 %Kuukausittain
🇫🇮
Työllisyysmuutos
−0,5 %0,2 %Kvartaali
🇫🇮
Työpaikkatarjousaste
2,5 %1,8 %Kvartaali
🇫🇮
Työssäkäyvät
2,696 milj. 2,645 milj. Kuukausittain
🇫🇮
Työttömät henkilöt
242 000 299 000 Kuukausittain
🇫🇮
Työttömyysaste
8,3 %10,2 %Kuukausittain
🇫🇮
väestö
5,56 milj. 5,55 milj. Vuosittain
🇫🇮
Valmistuksen palkat
116,7 points116,6 pointsKvartaali

Suomessa eläkeikä viittaa vähimmäisikään, jolloin työntekijät voivat ottaa valtion eläkkensä. Suomella on joustava eläkeikä (64-68 vuotta) ansiosidonnaisissa eläkkeissä, kun taas takuueläkejärjestelmän eläkeikä on 65 vuotta.

Mikä on Eläkeikä miehet

Retirement Age Men – Analyzing the Macroeconomic Impact in Finland’s Evolving Economy In the context of Finland’s evolving economy, the demographic segment known as 'Retirement Age Men' represents a significant macroeconomic variable. Eulerpool, your trusted source for comprehensive macroeconomic data, delves into the multifaceted influence this demographic wields over the Finnish economy, ranging from fiscal policies, labor market trends, to social security systems. This article provides an in-depth examination of the economic considerations and implications associated with Finnish men reaching retirement age. Finland, similar to many other developed nations, faces an aging population, with a particularly noteworthy impact from the male segment transitioning into retirement. This demographic shift has substantial repercussions on both micro and macroeconomic scales. The main factors to consider include the aging population’s effect on the labor force participation rate, public pension system sustainability, healthcare demand, and overall economic growth trajectory. Retirement age in Finland has seen gradual amendments to adapt to increasing life expectancy and economic sustainability pressures. The statutory retirement age has been a topic of extensive policy research and discussions, aimed at striking a balance between ensuring adequate living standards for retirees and maintaining economic productivity. For men, as well as women, the official retirement age can now adjust based on life expectancy projections, which underscores the government’s proactive stance in this domain. One of the principal macroeconomic concerns linked to the retirement age men demographic is the impact on the labor market. As men enter retirement, there is inevitably a reduction in the active workforce, which can lead to labor shortages in critical sectors. This necessitates strategic workforce planning and potential policy interventions such as retraining programs, incentives for delayed retirement, or immigration policies aimed at bolus support for the working-age population. The extent to which retired men re-enter the job market through part-time work or consultancy roles also influences the economic landscape. The fiscal sustainability of public pensions is another pressing macroeconomic challenge. With an increasing number of men reaching retirement age, the pressure on the pension system amplifies. Finland's pension model, largely defined by defined-benefit schemes, must ensure sufficient reserves to accommodate these demographic changes. The financial health of pension funds and their investment strategies become focal points of economic analysis and policy formulation. Actuarial assessments, alongside continuous policy adjustments, are vital to maintaining the resilience of the pension system amidst changing demographic patterns. Moreover, the healthcare sector experiences pronounced pressure due to an aging population. Men at retirement age typically exhibit higher healthcare needs, translating to increased public and private healthcare expenditure. This demographic trend necessitates comprehensive planning for healthcare resource allocation, budgeting for increased medical services, and exploring sustainable healthcare funding options. Analysis of healthcare demand, consumption patterns, and related economic impacts are crucial elements of a robust macroeconomic framework. Another facet of the economic impact emanates from the consumption patterns of retired men. As retirees, their spending habits may shift, influencing sectors such as housing, health services, leisure, and retail. Businesses and policymakers must understand these consumption shifts to capitalize on emerging market opportunities and address potential economic friction points. For example, demand for senior-friendly housing solutions, leisure activities, and age-appropriate consumer products could see an uptick, which businesses can strategically leverage. Additionally, the redistribution of income flows once retirement pension payments commence serves as another critical consideration. The inflow of pension income can stimulate particular economic segments, albeit in different ways than regular employment income. Understanding these redistribution effects is vital for macroeconomic stability and growth, ensuring policies support a seamless transition that sustains economic vibrancy. Furthermore, international comparisons often highlight the varied approaches to managing an aging population, providing valuable insights for Finland’s economic strategy. Comparing pension models, retirement age policies, healthcare systems, and labor force strategies across similar economies can yield actionable intelligence. Learning from nations facing comparable demographic shifts enables the refinement of domestic policies, fostering a resilient and adaptive economic environment. Our analysis of 'Retirement Age Men' also extends into the psychological and social dimensions impacting economic behavior. Retirement can influence individual decision-making, financial risk tolerance, and savings patterns. Understanding these subtleties allows for more accurate economic modeling and forecast, enabling adaptive financial products and services tailored to this demographic. In conclusion, the macroeconomic implications of men reaching retirement age in Finland underscores the necessity for nuanced, data-driven analysis and strategic policy formulation. At Eulerpool, we equip stakeholders with essential macroeconomic data and insights to navigate these complex dynamics. The concerted effort of policymakers, businesses, and the broader community to adapt to this demographic evolution will define the long-term economic landscape. By addressing the challenges and harnessing the opportunities presented by the retirement of Finnish men, the economy can maintain its trajectory of sustainable growth and robust health.