Access the world's leading financial data and tools
Subscribe for $2 United States Institute for Supply Management (ISM) Manufacturing Backlog of Orders
Price
The current value of the Institute for Supply Management (ISM) Manufacturing Backlog of Orders in United States is 44.1 Points. The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) Manufacturing Backlog of Orders in United States increased to 44.1 Points on 9/1/2024, after it was 43.6 Points on 8/1/2024. From 1/1/1993 to 9/1/2024, the average GDP in United States was 49.95 Points. The all-time high was reached on 5/1/2021 with 70.6 Points, while the lowest value was recorded on 12/1/2008 with 23.4 Points.
Institute for Supply Management (ISM) Manufacturing Backlog of Orders ·
3 years
5 years
10 years
25 Years
Max
ISM Manufacturing Backlog | |
---|---|
1/1/1993 | 56.5 points |
2/1/1993 | 56 points |
3/1/1993 | 54.5 points |
4/1/1993 | 51 points |
5/1/1993 | 51.5 points |
6/1/1993 | 52 points |
7/1/1993 | 45 points |
8/1/1993 | 51 points |
9/1/1993 | 49 points |
10/1/1993 | 55.5 points |
11/1/1993 | 56.5 points |
12/1/1993 | 54.5 points |
1/1/1994 | 58 points |
2/1/1994 | 56.5 points |
3/1/1994 | 56.5 points |
4/1/1994 | 61.5 points |
5/1/1994 | 61.5 points |
6/1/1994 | 60 points |
7/1/1994 | 59.5 points |
8/1/1994 | 60.5 points |
9/1/1994 | 60.5 points |
10/1/1994 | 60.5 points |
11/1/1994 | 58 points |
12/1/1994 | 53.5 points |
1/1/1995 | 54 points |
2/1/1995 | 55 points |
3/1/1995 | 51 points |
4/1/1995 | 47.5 points |
5/1/1995 | 42 points |
6/1/1995 | 36 points |
7/1/1995 | 41.5 points |
8/1/1995 | 40.5 points |
9/1/1995 | 43.5 points |
10/1/1995 | 40.5 points |
11/1/1995 | 41.5 points |
12/1/1995 | 42 points |
1/1/1996 | 41.5 points |
2/1/1996 | 43.5 points |
3/1/1996 | 40 points |
4/1/1996 | 44 points |
5/1/1996 | 48.5 points |
6/1/1996 | 51 points |
7/1/1996 | 47.5 points |
8/1/1996 | 47 points |
9/1/1996 | 49.5 points |
10/1/1996 | 44.5 points |
11/1/1996 | 49 points |
12/1/1996 | 51 points |
1/1/1997 | 45.5 points |
2/1/1997 | 48.5 points |
3/1/1997 | 51.5 points |
4/1/1997 | 54 points |
5/1/1997 | 58 points |
6/1/1997 | 53.5 points |
7/1/1997 | 56.5 points |
8/1/1997 | 60 points |
9/1/1997 | 50 points |
10/1/1997 | 56.5 points |
11/1/1997 | 50 points |
12/1/1997 | 52 points |
1/1/1998 | 47 points |
2/1/1998 | 48 points |
3/1/1998 | 51.5 points |
4/1/1998 | 52.5 points |
5/1/1998 | 48.5 points |
6/1/1998 | 48.5 points |
7/1/1998 | 44.5 points |
8/1/1998 | 48.5 points |
9/1/1998 | 46 points |
10/1/1998 | 45.5 points |
11/1/1998 | 40.5 points |
12/1/1998 | 37 points |
1/1/1999 | 38 points |
2/1/1999 | 48.5 points |
3/1/1999 | 52 points |
4/1/1999 | 53 points |
5/1/1999 | 55.5 points |
6/1/1999 | 54.5 points |
7/1/1999 | 50.5 points |
8/1/1999 | 52.5 points |
9/1/1999 | 54.5 points |
10/1/1999 | 54 points |
11/1/1999 | 58.5 points |
12/1/1999 | 50 points |
1/1/2000 | 52 points |
2/1/2000 | 54 points |
3/1/2000 | 51 points |
4/1/2000 | 51 points |
5/1/2000 | 49 points |
6/1/2000 | 48.5 points |
7/1/2000 | 45 points |
8/1/2000 | 49 points |
9/1/2000 | 47 points |
10/1/2000 | 41 points |
11/1/2000 | 42 points |
12/1/2000 | 36 points |
1/1/2001 | 32.5 points |
2/1/2001 | 37 points |
3/1/2001 | 43.5 points |
4/1/2001 | 43.5 points |
5/1/2001 | 40 points |
6/1/2001 | 42 points |
7/1/2001 | 42.5 points |
8/1/2001 | 44.5 points |
9/1/2001 | 43 points |
10/1/2001 | 36 points |
11/1/2001 | 38.5 points |
12/1/2001 | 39.5 points |
1/1/2002 | 44.5 points |
2/1/2002 | 53 points |
3/1/2002 | 62.5 points |
4/1/2002 | 56 points |
5/1/2002 | 56.5 points |
6/1/2002 | 53.5 points |
7/1/2002 | 45.5 points |
8/1/2002 | 45 points |
9/1/2002 | 44.5 points |
10/1/2002 | 43.5 points |
11/1/2002 | 42.5 points |
12/1/2002 | 46.5 points |
1/1/2003 | 45 points |
2/1/2003 | 49 points |
3/1/2003 | 41.5 points |
4/1/2003 | 47.5 points |
5/1/2003 | 51 points |
6/1/2003 | 50 points |
7/1/2003 | 51 points |
8/1/2003 | 51.5 points |
9/1/2003 | 52.5 points |
10/1/2003 | 53.5 points |
11/1/2003 | 59 points |
12/1/2003 | 61 points |
1/1/2004 | 60.5 points |
2/1/2004 | 62 points |
3/1/2004 | 63.5 points |
4/1/2004 | 66.5 points |
5/1/2004 | 63 points |
6/1/2004 | 58.5 points |
7/1/2004 | 58 points |
8/1/2004 | 55 points |
9/1/2004 | 55 points |
10/1/2004 | 49 points |
11/1/2004 | 47.5 points |
12/1/2004 | 54 points |
1/1/2005 | 50.5 points |
2/1/2005 | 50.5 points |
3/1/2005 | 56 points |
4/1/2005 | 53 points |
5/1/2005 | 51 points |
6/1/2005 | 51 points |
7/1/2005 | 49 points |
8/1/2005 | 50.5 points |
9/1/2005 | 55 points |
10/1/2005 | 55.5 points |
11/1/2005 | 53 points |
12/1/2005 | 49.5 points |
1/1/2006 | 53.5 points |
2/1/2006 | 54.5 points |
3/1/2006 | 59.5 points |
4/1/2006 | 57 points |
5/1/2006 | 53 points |
6/1/2006 | 54 points |
7/1/2006 | 50.5 points |
8/1/2006 | 51.5 points |
9/1/2006 | 46.5 points |
10/1/2006 | 44.5 points |
11/1/2006 | 46.5 points |
12/1/2006 | 45 points |
1/1/2007 | 46 points |
2/1/2007 | 56.5 points |
3/1/2007 | 49.6 points |
4/1/2007 | 54.1 points |
5/1/2007 | 53.7 points |
6/1/2007 | 53.5 points |
7/1/2007 | 54.5 points |
8/1/2007 | 51.5 points |
9/1/2007 | 50.2 points |
10/1/2007 | 50.4 points |
11/1/2007 | 41.7 points |
12/1/2007 | 43.7 points |
1/1/2008 | 46 points |
2/1/2008 | 46.9 points |
3/1/2008 | 46.3 points |
4/1/2008 | 52.3 points |
5/1/2008 | 45.6 points |
6/1/2008 | 47.9 points |
7/1/2008 | 44 points |
8/1/2008 | 48.2 points |
9/1/2008 | 38.7 points |
10/1/2008 | 30.6 points |
11/1/2008 | 27.7 points |
12/1/2008 | 23.4 points |
1/1/2009 | 32.2 points |
2/1/2009 | 33.6 points |
3/1/2009 | 37.6 points |
4/1/2009 | 40.9 points |
5/1/2009 | 46.1 points |
6/1/2009 | 48.6 points |
7/1/2009 | 49.4 points |
8/1/2009 | 50.9 points |
9/1/2009 | 52.6 points |
10/1/2009 | 50.5 points |
11/1/2009 | 51.8 points |
12/1/2009 | 50.1 points |
1/1/2010 | 53.2 points |
2/1/2010 | 58.8 points |
3/1/2010 | 54.7 points |
4/1/2010 | 57 points |
5/1/2010 | 56.3 points |
6/1/2010 | 57.6 points |
7/1/2010 | 54 points |
8/1/2010 | 51.5 points |
9/1/2010 | 44.4 points |
10/1/2010 | 45.1 points |
11/1/2010 | 48.7 points |
12/1/2010 | 46.3 points |
1/1/2011 | 57.1 points |
2/1/2011 | 55.6 points |
3/1/2011 | 52.8 points |
4/1/2011 | 59.2 points |
5/1/2011 | 50.1 points |
6/1/2011 | 52.5 points |
7/1/2011 | 49.8 points |
8/1/2011 | 46.3 points |
9/1/2011 | 43.7 points |
10/1/2011 | 48 points |
11/1/2011 | 46.8 points |
12/1/2011 | 48.2 points |
1/1/2012 | 52 points |
2/1/2012 | 50.4 points |
3/1/2012 | 52 points |
4/1/2012 | 47.6 points |
5/1/2012 | 44.2 points |
6/1/2012 | 41.2 points |
7/1/2012 | 42.1 points |
8/1/2012 | 41.9 points |
9/1/2012 | 46.4 points |
10/1/2012 | 42.4 points |
11/1/2012 | 42.1 points |
12/1/2012 | 47.3 points |
1/1/2013 | 45.2 points |
2/1/2013 | 53.1 points |
3/1/2013 | 49.7 points |
4/1/2013 | 51.4 points |
5/1/2013 | 48.1 points |
6/1/2013 | 45.1 points |
7/1/2013 | 45.4 points |
8/1/2013 | 46.4 points |
9/1/2013 | 50.1 points |
10/1/2013 | 51.2 points |
11/1/2013 | 54.1 points |
12/1/2013 | 51 points |
1/1/2014 | 46.6 points |
2/1/2014 | 50.5 points |
3/1/2014 | 57 points |
4/1/2014 | 54 points |
5/1/2014 | 51.5 points |
6/1/2014 | 46 points |
7/1/2014 | 49.5 points |
8/1/2014 | 53.6 points |
9/1/2014 | 46.8 points |
10/1/2014 | 52.5 points |
11/1/2014 | 53.7 points |
12/1/2014 | 52 points |
1/1/2015 | 45.8 points |
2/1/2015 | 50.1 points |
3/1/2015 | 47.4 points |
4/1/2015 | 48.2 points |
5/1/2015 | 52.9 points |
6/1/2015 | 45.2 points |
7/1/2015 | 43.6 points |
8/1/2015 | 46.6 points |
9/1/2015 | 40.7 points |
10/1/2015 | 44.4 points |
11/1/2015 | 43.3 points |
12/1/2015 | 41.7 points |
1/1/2016 | 42.6 points |
2/1/2016 | 48.3 points |
3/1/2016 | 50.6 points |
4/1/2016 | 49.7 points |
5/1/2016 | 46.3 points |
6/1/2016 | 52.7 points |
7/1/2016 | 48.5 points |
8/1/2016 | 47.4 points |
9/1/2016 | 48.6 points |
10/1/2016 | 45.8 points |
11/1/2016 | 48.7 points |
12/1/2016 | 48.6 points |
1/1/2017 | 48.6 points |
2/1/2017 | 57.1 points |
3/1/2017 | 57.5 points |
4/1/2017 | 56.9 points |
5/1/2017 | 54 points |
6/1/2017 | 56.5 points |
7/1/2017 | 54.3 points |
8/1/2017 | 56.5 points |
9/1/2017 | 56.9 points |
10/1/2017 | 53.9 points |
11/1/2017 | 54.3 points |
12/1/2017 | 54.9 points |
1/1/2018 | 56.2 points |
2/1/2018 | 59.8 points |
3/1/2018 | 59.8 points |
4/1/2018 | 62 points |
5/1/2018 | 63.5 points |
6/1/2018 | 60.1 points |
7/1/2018 | 54.7 points |
8/1/2018 | 57.5 points |
9/1/2018 | 55.7 points |
10/1/2018 | 55.8 points |
11/1/2018 | 56.4 points |
12/1/2018 | 50 points |
1/1/2019 | 50.3 points |
2/1/2019 | 52.3 points |
3/1/2019 | 50.4 points |
4/1/2019 | 53.9 points |
5/1/2019 | 47.2 points |
6/1/2019 | 47.4 points |
7/1/2019 | 43.1 points |
8/1/2019 | 46.3 points |
9/1/2019 | 45.1 points |
10/1/2019 | 44.1 points |
11/1/2019 | 43 points |
12/1/2019 | 43.3 points |
1/1/2020 | 45.7 points |
2/1/2020 | 50.3 points |
3/1/2020 | 45.9 points |
4/1/2020 | 37.8 points |
5/1/2020 | 38.2 points |
6/1/2020 | 45.3 points |
7/1/2020 | 51.8 points |
8/1/2020 | 54.6 points |
9/1/2020 | 55.2 points |
10/1/2020 | 55.7 points |
11/1/2020 | 56.9 points |
12/1/2020 | 59.1 points |
1/1/2021 | 59.7 points |
2/1/2021 | 64 points |
3/1/2021 | 67.5 points |
4/1/2021 | 68.2 points |
5/1/2021 | 70.6 points |
6/1/2021 | 64.5 points |
7/1/2021 | 65 points |
8/1/2021 | 68.2 points |
9/1/2021 | 64.8 points |
10/1/2021 | 63.6 points |
11/1/2021 | 61.9 points |
12/1/2021 | 62.8 points |
1/1/2022 | 56.4 points |
2/1/2022 | 65 points |
3/1/2022 | 60 points |
4/1/2022 | 56 points |
5/1/2022 | 58.7 points |
6/1/2022 | 53.2 points |
7/1/2022 | 51.3 points |
8/1/2022 | 53 points |
9/1/2022 | 50.9 points |
10/1/2022 | 45.3 points |
11/1/2022 | 40 points |
12/1/2022 | 41.4 points |
1/1/2023 | 43.4 points |
2/1/2023 | 45.1 points |
3/1/2023 | 43.9 points |
4/1/2023 | 43.1 points |
5/1/2023 | 37.5 points |
6/1/2023 | 38.7 points |
7/1/2023 | 42.8 points |
8/1/2023 | 44.1 points |
9/1/2023 | 42.4 points |
10/1/2023 | 42.2 points |
11/1/2023 | 39.3 points |
12/1/2023 | 45.3 points |
1/1/2024 | 44.7 points |
2/1/2024 | 46.3 points |
3/1/2024 | 46.3 points |
4/1/2024 | 45.4 points |
5/1/2024 | 42.4 points |
6/1/2024 | 41.7 points |
7/1/2024 | 41.7 points |
8/1/2024 | 43.6 points |
9/1/2024 | 44.1 points |
Institute for Supply Management (ISM) Manufacturing Backlog of Orders History
Date | Value |
---|---|
9/1/2024 | 44.1 Points |
8/1/2024 | 43.6 Points |
7/1/2024 | 41.7 Points |
6/1/2024 | 41.7 Points |
5/1/2024 | 42.4 Points |
4/1/2024 | 45.4 Points |
3/1/2024 | 46.3 Points |
2/1/2024 | 46.3 Points |
1/1/2024 | 44.7 Points |
12/1/2023 | 45.3 Points |
Similar Macro Indicators to Institute for Supply Management (ISM) Manufacturing Backlog of Orders
Macro pages for other countries in America
- 🇦🇷Argentina
- 🇦🇼Aruba
- 🇧🇸Bahamas
- 🇧🇧Barbados
- 🇧🇿Belize
- 🇧🇲Bermuda
- 🇧🇴Bolivia
- 🇧🇷Brazil
- 🇨🇦Canada
- 🇰🇾Cayman Islands
- 🇨🇱Chile
- 🇨🇴Colombia
- 🇨🇷Costa Rica
- 🇨🇺Cuba
- 🇩🇴Dominican Republic
- 🇪🇨Ecuador
- 🇸🇻El Salvador
- 🇬🇹Guatemala
- 🇬🇾Guyana
- 🇭🇹Haiti
- 🇭🇳Honduras
- 🇯🇲Jamaica
- 🇲🇽Mexico
- 🇳🇮Nicaragua
- 🇵🇦Panama
- 🇵🇾Paraguay
- 🇵🇪Peru
- 🇵🇷Puerto Rico
- 🇸🇷Suriname
- 🇹🇹Trinidad and Tobago
- 🇺🇾Uruguay
- 🇻🇪Venezuela
- 🇦🇬Antigua and Barbuda
- 🇩🇲Dominica
- 🇬🇩Grenada
What is Institute for Supply Management (ISM) Manufacturing Backlog of Orders?
The "ISM Manufacturing Backlog of Orders" is a vital metric within the domain of macroeconomic indicators, broadly tracked by economists, investors, and business professionals. At Eulerpool, we provide comprehensive and up-to-date insights into economic data, and this particular metric occupies a critical place in understanding the health and direction of the manufacturing sector. The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) is a global leader in economic intelligence. It aggregates data from supply chain managers and executives across various industries, thereby offering a robust reflection of the economic landscape. The "Backlog of Orders" index is specifically curated from the Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) report, which itself is a closely-watched economic indicator. The ISM Manufacturing Backlog of Orders measures the volume of unfulfilled orders within the manufacturing sector. In simpler terms, it represents the orders received by manufacturers that have yet to be completed and delivered to clients. These unfulfilled orders offer a window into the future activity of the manufacturing sector. A high backlog of orders can often suggest a healthy demand but could also imply bottleneck issues or capacity constraints. Conversely, a low backlog might indicate a slowing demand, but also that manufacturers are efficiently meeting current market needs. One pivotal aspect of understanding the "Backlog of Orders" is its cyclical nature. Economic cycles have stages of expansion and contraction, and manufacturing backlogs typically display correlated patterns. During periods of economic expansion, demand for goods increases, leading to a rise in backlogs. Conversely, during downturns, the backlog could shrink as orders decline or are more easily met due to reduced production demands. Understanding these cycles is essential for stakeholders to position themselves advantageously in the market. An increase in the backlog of orders suggests several possible implications for the broader economy. For one, elevated backlogs can indicate robust consumer and business demand, which, in the long-term, may lead to increased production levels and potentially boost employment within the manufacturing sector. However, substantial backlogs might also point to supply chain constraints, inefficiencies, or resource shortages that need addressing. For instance, manufacturers might face difficulties in obtaining essential materials or components, causing delays in fulfilling orders. The rapid pace of technological advancements significantly impacts manufacturing, adding another layer of complexity to interpreting backlog levels. Innovations in automation, supply chain management, and production techniques can either alleviate or exacerbate backlog figures depending on their adoption and integration. For instance, cutting-edge inventory management software might streamline operations and reduce backlogs by enhancing production efficiency. Meanwhile, the slow adoption of new technologies could perpetuate high backlog levels. Supply chain professionals closely monitor the ISM Manufacturing Backlog of Orders to inform their strategies and operations. A significant backlog could prioritize investments in capacity expansion, process improvements, or workforce training. Conversely, a shrinking backlog might prompt cost control measures or operational scaling adjustments. By providing actionable insights, the backlog of orders metric serves as a critical decision-making tool for supply chain managers. In financial markets, the ISM Manufacturing Backlog of Orders also commands significant attention. Investors scrutinize the data to gauge economic momentum, predict corporate earnings, and adjust portfolio strategies accordingly. A rising backlog of orders is frequently interpreted as a bullish signal for the manufacturing sector, potentially driving up stock prices of companies within the industry. On the other hand, a declining backlog could presage a slowdown, invoking caution among investors. Economists and policymakers utilize the backlog of orders as a barometer for economic planning and policy formulation. For example, persistent high levels of unfulfilled orders may prompt regulatory measures to ease production bottlenecks or stimulate expansions in manufacturing capacities. Conversely, low backlogs might necessitate initiatives to spur demand or support struggling sectors. Given these multifaceted implications, the ISM Manufacturing Backlog of Orders is indispensable in the wider context of economic analysis and forecasting. Its relevance extends beyond mere manufacturing—it informs strategies, predictions, and policy decisions that shape entire economies. At Eulerpool, our commitment to providing in-depth, real-time economic data ensures that professionals across industries have access to critical insights like the ISM Manufacturing Backlog of Orders. We recognize that accurate and timely economic data empowers stakeholders to make well-informed decisions, driving sustained growth and economic resilience. In summary, the ISM Manufacturing Backlog of Orders is more than just a reflection of the pending workload within factories. It’s an indicator of the broader economic environment, capturing demand dynamics, production capabilities, and supply chain efficiencies. Whether you are an economist, investor, business leader, or supply chain manager, understanding this metric equips you with vital foresight into the underlying currents shaping the manufacturing landscape and the broader economy. At Eulerpool, we strive to bring such critical economic indicators to the fore, enabling our users to navigate the complex waters of economic analysis with confidence and precision.