Access the world's leading financial data and tools
Subscribe for $2 Sweden Government Spending to Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
Price
The current value of the Government Spending to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in Sweden is 47.6 % of GDP. The Government Spending to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in Sweden decreased to 47.6 % of GDP on 1/1/2022, after it was 49.2 % of GDP on 1/1/2021. From 1/1/1993 to 1/1/2023, the average GDP in Sweden was 53.31 % of GDP. The all-time high was reached on 1/1/1993 with 70.5 % of GDP, while the lowest value was recorded on 1/1/2022 with 47.6 % of GDP.
Government Spending to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) ·
3 years
5 years
10 years
25 Years
Max
Government Spending to GDP | |
---|---|
1/1/1993 | 70.5 % of GDP |
1/1/1994 | 68.3 % of GDP |
1/1/1995 | 63 % of GDP |
1/1/1996 | 61 % of GDP |
1/1/1997 | 58.7 % of GDP |
1/1/1998 | 56.4 % of GDP |
1/1/1999 | 56 % of GDP |
1/1/2000 | 53.1 % of GDP |
1/1/2001 | 52.5 % of GDP |
1/1/2002 | 53.6 % of GDP |
1/1/2003 | 53.8 % of GDP |
1/1/2004 | 52.5 % of GDP |
1/1/2005 | 52.3 % of GDP |
1/1/2006 | 51.1 % of GDP |
1/1/2007 | 49.3 % of GDP |
1/1/2008 | 50 % of GDP |
1/1/2009 | 52.4 % of GDP |
1/1/2010 | 50.4 % of GDP |
1/1/2011 | 49.8 % of GDP |
1/1/2012 | 51 % of GDP |
1/1/2013 | 51.7 % of GDP |
1/1/2014 | 50.7 % of GDP |
1/1/2015 | 49.4 % of GDP |
1/1/2016 | 49.7 % of GDP |
1/1/2017 | 49.3 % of GDP |
1/1/2018 | 49.9 % of GDP |
1/1/2019 | 49.2 % of GDP |
1/1/2020 | 52.1 % of GDP |
1/1/2021 | 49.2 % of GDP |
1/1/2022 | 47.6 % of GDP |
Government Spending to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) History
Date | Value |
---|---|
1/1/2022 | 47.6 % of GDP |
1/1/2021 | 49.2 % of GDP |
1/1/2020 | 52.1 % of GDP |
1/1/2019 | 49.2 % of GDP |
1/1/2018 | 49.9 % of GDP |
1/1/2017 | 49.3 % of GDP |
1/1/2016 | 49.7 % of GDP |
1/1/2015 | 49.4 % of GDP |
1/1/2014 | 50.7 % of GDP |
1/1/2013 | 51.7 % of GDP |
Similar Macro Indicators to Government Spending to Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
Name | Current | Previous | Frequency |
---|---|---|---|
🇸🇪 Asylum applications | 485 persons | 545 persons | Monthly |
🇸🇪 Corruption Index | 82 Points | 83 Points | Annually |
🇸🇪 Corruption Rank | 6 | 5 | Annually |
🇸🇪 Fiscal Expenditure | 110.087 B SEK | 111.593 B SEK | Monthly |
🇸🇪 Government budget | -0.6 % of GDP | 1.2 % of GDP | Annually |
🇸🇪 Government Debt to GDP Ratio | 31.2 % of GDP | 33.2 % of GDP | Annually |
🇸🇪 Government Spending | 379.03 B SEK | 377.006 B SEK | Quarter |
🇸🇪 Military expenditures | 8.755 B USD | 7.723 B USD | Annually |
🇸🇪 Public debt | 1.058 T SEK | 1.012 T SEK | Monthly |
🇸🇪 Public revenue | 143.179 B SEK | 72.835 B SEK | Monthly |
🇸🇪 Value of the State Budget | 31.586 B SEK | -30.594 B SEK | Monthly |
Macro pages for other countries in Europe
- 🇦🇱Albania
- 🇦🇹Austria
- 🇧🇾Belarus
- 🇧🇪Belgium
- 🇧🇦Bosnia and Herzegovina
- 🇧🇬Bulgaria
- 🇭🇷Croatia
- 🇨🇾Cyprus
- 🇨🇿Czech Republic
- 🇩🇰Denmark
- 🇪🇪Estonia
- 🇫🇴Faroe Islands
- 🇫🇮Finland
- 🇫🇷France
- 🇩🇪Germany
- 🇬🇷Greece
- 🇭🇺Hungary
- 🇮🇸Island
- 🇮🇪Ireland
- 🇮🇹Italy
- 🇽🇰Kosovo
- 🇱🇻Latvia
- 🇱🇮Liechtenstein
- 🇱🇹Lithuania
- 🇱🇺Luxembourg
- 🇲🇰North Macedonia
- 🇲🇹Malta
- 🇲🇩Moldova
- 🇲🇨Monaco
- 🇲🇪Montenegro
- 🇳🇱Netherlands
- 🇳🇴Norway
- 🇵🇱Poland
- 🇵🇹Portugal
- 🇷🇴Romania
- 🇷🇺Russia
- 🇷🇸Serbia
- 🇸🇰Slovakia
- 🇸🇮Slovenia
- 🇪🇸Spain
- 🇨🇭Switzerland
- 🇺🇦Ukraine
- 🇬🇧United Kingdom
- 🇦🇩Andorra
What is Government Spending to Gross Domestic Product (GDP)?
Government Spending to GDP: An In-Depth Analysis At Eulerpool, we pride ourselves on providing a comprehensive database of macroeconomic data to enhance the understanding and decision-making processes of professionals and enthusiasts alike. One of the critical metrics in macroeconomic analysis is the Government Spending to GDP ratio. This ratio serves as a vital indicator of a nation's fiscal policy and economic priorities, providing insights into the scale and impact of government expenditure relative to the country's economic output. The Government Spending to GDP ratio, often represented as a percentage, is calculated by dividing a country's total government expenditures by its Gross Domestic Product (GDP). This ratio offers a snapshot of government activity and its role within the broader economy. By analyzing this figure, economists, policymakers, investors, and analysts can gain valuable insights into the fiscal health and development strategies of various economies. Government expenditures typically encompass a wide range of activities, including public services such as healthcare and education, infrastructure projects, defense spending, social welfare programs, and administrative costs. These expenditures play an essential role in promoting economic stability, enhancing the quality of human capital, and fostering long-term economic growth. However, the scale and efficacy of such spending can vary significantly between countries and over time, influenced by political philosophies, economic conditions, and demographic factors. A high Government Spending to GDP ratio can signal several potential scenarios. In some cases, it may indicate robust public investment in essential services and infrastructure, aiming to catalyze economic growth and development. For instance, Nordic countries, which are renowned for their extensive welfare systems, consistently exhibit high Government Spending to GDP ratios. These countries allocate substantial resources to education, healthcare, and social security, reflecting their commitment to high standards of living and social equity. Conversely, a high ratio may also reflect unsustainable fiscal practices, particularly if financed through continuous borrowing, leading to escalating public debt levels. Countries grappling with long-term budget deficits and rising debt burdens might experience fiscal stress, potentially culminating in reduced investor confidence, higher interest rates, and constrained future investment opportunities. Managing such a balance is critical, as runaway government spending can lead to inflationary pressures and crowd out private investment. On the other hand, a low Government Spending to GDP ratio might suggest a leaner government footprint, indicative of a laissez-faire economic approach that relies more on market mechanisms and private sector activities. Countries such as Singapore, traditionally known for their prudent fiscal policies and efficient governments, often exhibit lower ratios. Such fiscal conservatism can lead to stronger investor confidence and sustainable economic growth through private sector dynamism and innovation. However, it is vital to consider whether low government spending might also translate to underinvestment in crucial public services and infrastructure, potentially leading to social inequalities and hampered long-term growth prospects. In monitoring the Government Spending to GDP ratio, it is imperative to contextualize the data within the broader economic and social framework of each country. For developing economies, higher government spending may be directed toward critical areas such as infrastructure development, education, and poverty alleviation, aiming to lay the foundations for future economic growth. These investments can yield long-term benefits but may also present immediate fiscal challenges if not managed prudently. For developed economies, shifts in the Government Spending to GDP ratio often reflect changing priorities and policy responses to evolving economic challenges. During economic downturns, governments may increase spending through stimulus packages and social safety nets to counteract adverse economic impacts, as witnessed globally during the 2008 financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic. Conversely, during periods of robust economic growth, prudent fiscal management may call for reducing spending and building fiscal buffers. Analyzing trends in the Government Spending to GDP ratio also requires a consideration of demographic factors. Aging populations in many advanced economies necessitate higher spending on pensions and healthcare, hence pushing up government expenditure as a share of GDP. In contrast, younger, growing populations might require significant investments in education, vocational training, and job creation initiatives, reflecting different expenditure priorities. It is equally essential to recognize the role of political ideologies and governance structures in shaping government expenditure levels. Different administrations within the same country may undertake varying fiscal approaches, leading to fluctuations in government spending relative to GDP. Political stability, governance quality, and corruption levels also influence the efficacy of government spending, impacting economic outcomes regardless of expenditure magnitude. At Eulerpool, our goal is to facilitate a nuanced understanding of macroeconomic indicators like the Government Spending to GDP ratio. By leveraging our comprehensive datasets and analytical tools, users can explore historical trends, conduct cross-country comparisons, and develop informed assessments of fiscal policies and economic strategies. Such insights are invaluable for stakeholders ranging from policymakers tasked with crafting effective fiscal policies to investors making strategic decisions in global markets. Understanding the interplay between government spending and economic growth, development, and stability is crucial in navigating the complex landscape of modern economies. The Government Spending to GDP ratio stands out as an essential barometer of economic policy, reflecting not only expenditure priorities but also governance, demographic dynamics, and development trajectories. By examining this ratio through the lens of economic theory, empirical data, and policy analysis, one can gain a richer perspective on the multifaceted role of government spending in shaping economic outcomes. At Eulerpool, we remain committed to enhancing access to critical economic data and fostering informed dialogues around key macroeconomic indicators. Our platform serves as a resource for those seeking to delve deeper into the economic narratives that drive our world, offering tools and insights to aid in understanding the intricate dynamics of government spending and its broader economic implications.