Access the world's leading financial data and tools
Subscribe for $2 Latvia Youth Unemployment Rate
Price
The current value of the Youth Unemployment Rate in Latvia is 9.8 %. The Youth Unemployment Rate in Latvia decreased to 9.8 % on 5/1/2024, after it was 10 % on 4/1/2024. From 4/1/1998 to 6/1/2024, the average GDP in Latvia was 19.43 %. The all-time high was reached on 1/1/2010 with 42.6 %, while the lowest value was recorded on 11/1/2007 with 6.9 %.
Youth Unemployment Rate ·
3 years
5 years
10 years
25 Years
Max
Youth Unemployment Rate | |
---|---|
4/1/1998 | 26.2 % |
5/1/1998 | 26.2 % |
6/1/1998 | 26.2 % |
7/1/1998 | 26 % |
8/1/1998 | 25.7 % |
9/1/1998 | 25.2 % |
10/1/1998 | 24.6 % |
11/1/1998 | 24.2 % |
12/1/1998 | 24 % |
1/1/1999 | 24.1 % |
2/1/1999 | 24 % |
3/1/1999 | 24 % |
4/1/1999 | 23.7 % |
5/1/1999 | 23.6 % |
6/1/1999 | 23.7 % |
7/1/1999 | 24 % |
8/1/1999 | 24.1 % |
9/1/1999 | 24.1 % |
10/1/1999 | 23.9 % |
11/1/1999 | 23.7 % |
12/1/1999 | 23.4 % |
1/1/2000 | 23 % |
2/1/2000 | 22.6 % |
3/1/2000 | 22.3 % |
4/1/2000 | 22 % |
5/1/2000 | 21.9 % |
6/1/2000 | 22 % |
7/1/2000 | 22.2 % |
8/1/2000 | 22.6 % |
9/1/2000 | 22.9 % |
10/1/2000 | 23.4 % |
11/1/2000 | 23.4 % |
12/1/2000 | 23.2 % |
1/1/2001 | 22.7 % |
2/1/2001 | 22.3 % |
3/1/2001 | 22.2 % |
4/1/2001 | 22.2 % |
5/1/2001 | 22.3 % |
6/1/2001 | 22.2 % |
7/1/2001 | 22.1 % |
8/1/2001 | 22 % |
9/1/2001 | 22.2 % |
10/1/2001 | 25.9 % |
11/1/2001 | 24 % |
12/1/2001 | 21.6 % |
1/1/2002 | 18.9 % |
2/1/2002 | 18 % |
3/1/2002 | 19 % |
4/1/2002 | 22 % |
5/1/2002 | 23.1 % |
6/1/2002 | 22.2 % |
7/1/2002 | 20 % |
8/1/2002 | 19.3 % |
9/1/2002 | 19.2 % |
10/1/2002 | 20.2 % |
11/1/2002 | 21.4 % |
12/1/2002 | 21.6 % |
1/1/2003 | 21.2 % |
2/1/2003 | 20.6 % |
3/1/2003 | 19.4 % |
4/1/2003 | 17.6 % |
5/1/2003 | 17.4 % |
6/1/2003 | 18.3 % |
7/1/2003 | 20.6 % |
8/1/2003 | 21.8 % |
9/1/2003 | 21.4 % |
10/1/2003 | 19.4 % |
11/1/2003 | 18.6 % |
12/1/2003 | 18.9 % |
1/1/2004 | 20.5 % |
2/1/2004 | 21 % |
3/1/2004 | 20.4 % |
4/1/2004 | 19.5 % |
5/1/2004 | 18.7 % |
6/1/2004 | 18.4 % |
7/1/2004 | 18.8 % |
8/1/2004 | 19.8 % |
9/1/2004 | 20.5 % |
10/1/2004 | 21 % |
11/1/2004 | 20.9 % |
12/1/2004 | 19.7 % |
1/1/2005 | 17.6 % |
2/1/2005 | 16.6 % |
3/1/2005 | 17.1 % |
4/1/2005 | 18.9 % |
5/1/2005 | 18.7 % |
6/1/2005 | 16.8 % |
7/1/2005 | 12.6 % |
8/1/2005 | 10.2 % |
9/1/2005 | 10.4 % |
10/1/2005 | 12.4 % |
11/1/2005 | 13.6 % |
12/1/2005 | 13.9 % |
1/1/2006 | 13.5 % |
2/1/2006 | 14.2 % |
3/1/2006 | 15.8 % |
4/1/2006 | 18.2 % |
5/1/2006 | 18.3 % |
6/1/2006 | 15.8 % |
7/1/2006 | 11.4 % |
8/1/2006 | 9.2 % |
9/1/2006 | 9.1 % |
10/1/2006 | 11.2 % |
11/1/2006 | 12.6 % |
12/1/2006 | 13.2 % |
1/1/2007 | 12.8 % |
2/1/2007 | 12.1 % |
3/1/2007 | 11.3 % |
4/1/2007 | 10.6 % |
5/1/2007 | 10.6 % |
6/1/2007 | 11.1 % |
7/1/2007 | 12.2 % |
8/1/2007 | 12.2 % |
9/1/2007 | 10.8 % |
10/1/2007 | 7.9 % |
11/1/2007 | 6.9 % |
12/1/2007 | 7.7 % |
1/1/2008 | 10.4 % |
2/1/2008 | 11.7 % |
3/1/2008 | 11.6 % |
4/1/2008 | 10.5 % |
5/1/2008 | 10.2 % |
6/1/2008 | 10.3 % |
7/1/2008 | 10.9 % |
8/1/2008 | 12.4 % |
9/1/2008 | 14.7 % |
10/1/2008 | 18 % |
11/1/2008 | 22 % |
12/1/2008 | 25.7 % |
1/1/2009 | 29 % |
2/1/2009 | 30.8 % |
3/1/2009 | 30.1 % |
4/1/2009 | 28 % |
5/1/2009 | 27.5 % |
6/1/2009 | 28.8 % |
7/1/2009 | 32.5 % |
8/1/2009 | 35.6 % |
9/1/2009 | 37.5 % |
10/1/2009 | 38.8 % |
11/1/2009 | 40.5 % |
12/1/2009 | 41.8 % |
1/1/2010 | 42.6 % |
2/1/2010 | 41.7 % |
3/1/2010 | 39.8 % |
4/1/2010 | 36.7 % |
5/1/2010 | 34.2 % |
6/1/2010 | 32.7 % |
7/1/2010 | 33.1 % |
8/1/2010 | 35 % |
9/1/2010 | 35.4 % |
10/1/2010 | 34.4 % |
11/1/2010 | 33.7 % |
12/1/2010 | 33 % |
1/1/2011 | 32.6 % |
2/1/2011 | 32.4 % |
3/1/2011 | 32.4 % |
4/1/2011 | 33.2 % |
5/1/2011 | 32.9 % |
6/1/2011 | 31.9 % |
7/1/2011 | 30.4 % |
8/1/2011 | 30.2 % |
9/1/2011 | 29.9 % |
10/1/2011 | 29 % |
11/1/2011 | 28.7 % |
12/1/2011 | 28.9 % |
1/1/2012 | 29.8 % |
2/1/2012 | 30.4 % |
3/1/2012 | 30.4 % |
4/1/2012 | 29.9 % |
5/1/2012 | 29.9 % |
6/1/2012 | 30.2 % |
7/1/2012 | 31.5 % |
8/1/2012 | 31.8 % |
9/1/2012 | 29.7 % |
10/1/2012 | 24.8 % |
11/1/2012 | 22.1 % |
12/1/2012 | 21.5 % |
1/1/2013 | 23.4 % |
2/1/2013 | 24 % |
3/1/2013 | 22.5 % |
4/1/2013 | 19.4 % |
5/1/2013 | 18.7 % |
6/1/2013 | 20.8 % |
7/1/2013 | 25.3 % |
8/1/2013 | 27.7 % |
9/1/2013 | 27.6 % |
10/1/2013 | 24.8 % |
11/1/2013 | 22.6 % |
12/1/2013 | 20.6 % |
1/1/2014 | 18.8 % |
2/1/2014 | 18.3 % |
3/1/2014 | 18.5 % |
4/1/2014 | 20 % |
5/1/2014 | 21 % |
6/1/2014 | 21.1 % |
7/1/2014 | 20.8 % |
8/1/2014 | 21 % |
9/1/2014 | 20.6 % |
10/1/2014 | 19.5 % |
11/1/2014 | 18.4 % |
12/1/2014 | 16.8 % |
1/1/2015 | 15.1 % |
2/1/2015 | 14.6 % |
3/1/2015 | 14.7 % |
4/1/2015 | 14.8 % |
5/1/2015 | 15 % |
6/1/2015 | 14.8 % |
7/1/2015 | 14.6 % |
8/1/2015 | 15.5 % |
9/1/2015 | 17.3 % |
10/1/2015 | 19.9 % |
11/1/2015 | 20.7 % |
12/1/2015 | 19.1 % |
1/1/2016 | 15.8 % |
2/1/2016 | 14.3 % |
3/1/2016 | 14.6 % |
4/1/2016 | 17.2 % |
5/1/2016 | 18.9 % |
6/1/2016 | 19.5 % |
7/1/2016 | 19.3 % |
8/1/2016 | 18.9 % |
9/1/2016 | 18.4 % |
10/1/2016 | 17.1 % |
11/1/2016 | 16.6 % |
12/1/2016 | 16.5 % |
1/1/2017 | 17.1 % |
2/1/2017 | 17.1 % |
3/1/2017 | 16.7 % |
4/1/2017 | 16.4 % |
5/1/2017 | 16.7 % |
6/1/2017 | 16.8 % |
7/1/2017 | 16.9 % |
8/1/2017 | 17.2 % |
9/1/2017 | 17.5 % |
10/1/2017 | 17.9 % |
11/1/2017 | 17.8 % |
12/1/2017 | 16.8 % |
1/1/2018 | 15.4 % |
2/1/2018 | 14.2 % |
3/1/2018 | 13.2 % |
4/1/2018 | 12.1 % |
5/1/2018 | 11.2 % |
6/1/2018 | 10.6 % |
7/1/2018 | 10.4 % |
8/1/2018 | 10.6 % |
9/1/2018 | 11.1 % |
10/1/2018 | 12.2 % |
11/1/2018 | 12.8 % |
12/1/2018 | 13 % |
1/1/2019 | 12.9 % |
2/1/2019 | 13.3 % |
3/1/2019 | 13.7 % |
4/1/2019 | 14.9 % |
5/1/2019 | 15.2 % |
6/1/2019 | 14.3 % |
7/1/2019 | 12.1 % |
8/1/2019 | 10.8 % |
9/1/2019 | 10.1 % |
10/1/2019 | 9.9 % |
11/1/2019 | 10.4 % |
12/1/2019 | 11.4 % |
1/1/2020 | 13.2 % |
2/1/2020 | 14.1 % |
3/1/2020 | 15.7 % |
4/1/2020 | 18 % |
5/1/2020 | 18.5 % |
6/1/2020 | 17.6 % |
7/1/2020 | 15.9 % |
8/1/2020 | 14.3 % |
9/1/2020 | 12.8 % |
10/1/2020 | 11.5 % |
11/1/2020 | 11.7 % |
12/1/2020 | 12.7 % |
1/1/2021 | 14.4 % |
2/1/2021 | 15.7 % |
3/1/2021 | 16.4 % |
4/1/2021 | 16.9 % |
5/1/2021 | 17.2 % |
6/1/2021 | 16.5 % |
7/1/2021 | 15.4 % |
8/1/2021 | 14.7 % |
9/1/2021 | 13.8 % |
10/1/2021 | 12.7 % |
11/1/2021 | 12 % |
12/1/2021 | 11.5 % |
1/1/2022 | 10.9 % |
2/1/2022 | 11.2 % |
3/1/2022 | 12.1 % |
4/1/2022 | 13.4 % |
5/1/2022 | 14.4 % |
6/1/2022 | 15.5 % |
7/1/2022 | 16.5 % |
8/1/2022 | 17.3 % |
9/1/2022 | 18 % |
10/1/2022 | 18 % |
11/1/2022 | 17.4 % |
12/1/2022 | 16.1 % |
1/1/2023 | 14.6 % |
2/1/2023 | 13 % |
3/1/2023 | 11.3 % |
4/1/2023 | 9.9 % |
5/1/2023 | 9.4 % |
6/1/2023 | 9.8 % |
7/1/2023 | 11.1 % |
8/1/2023 | 12.4 % |
9/1/2023 | 13.5 % |
10/1/2023 | 14.6 % |
11/1/2023 | 15 % |
12/1/2023 | 14.2 % |
1/1/2024 | 12 % |
2/1/2024 | 10.9 % |
3/1/2024 | 10.1 % |
4/1/2024 | 10 % |
5/1/2024 | 9.8 % |
Youth Unemployment Rate History
Date | Value |
---|---|
5/1/2024 | 9.8 % |
4/1/2024 | 10 % |
3/1/2024 | 10.1 % |
2/1/2024 | 10.9 % |
1/1/2024 | 12 % |
12/1/2023 | 14.2 % |
11/1/2023 | 15 % |
10/1/2023 | 14.6 % |
9/1/2023 | 13.5 % |
8/1/2023 | 12.4 % |
Similar Macro Indicators to Youth Unemployment Rate
Name | Current | Previous | Frequency |
---|---|---|---|
🇱🇻 Employed persons | 880,000 | 878,000 | Quarter |
🇱🇻 Employment Change | 0.3 % | -1 % | Quarter |
🇱🇻 Employment rate | 64 % | 64 % | Quarter |
🇱🇻 Full-time employment | 768,000 | 768,500 | Quarter |
🇱🇻 Job Opportunities | 24,224 | 22,230 | Quarter |
🇱🇻 Job Vacancy Rate | 2.8 % | 2.5 % | Quarter |
🇱🇻 Labor costs | 173.26 points | 170.19 points | Quarter |
🇱🇻 Labor force participation rate | 68.9 % | 68.6 % | Quarter |
🇱🇻 Long-term unemployment rate | 2.1 % | 1.8 % | Quarter |
🇱🇻 Minimum Wages | 700 EUR/Month | 700 EUR/Month | Quarter |
🇱🇻 Part-time work | 58,200 | 56,700 | Quarter |
🇱🇻 Population | 1.87 M | 1.88 M | Annually |
🇱🇻 Productivity | 120.417 points | 120.774 points | Quarter |
🇱🇻 Retirement Age Men | 64.75 Years | 64.5 Years | Annually |
🇱🇻 Retirement Age Women | 64.75 Years | 64.5 Years | Annually |
🇱🇻 Unemployed Persons | 45,432 | 47,858 | Monthly |
🇱🇻 Unemployment Rate | 7.2 % | 6.8 % | Quarter |
🇱🇻 Wages | 1,213 EUR/Month | 1,160 EUR/Month | Monthly |
Macro pages for other countries in Europe
- 🇦🇱Albania
- 🇦🇹Austria
- 🇧🇾Belarus
- 🇧🇪Belgium
- 🇧🇦Bosnia and Herzegovina
- 🇧🇬Bulgaria
- 🇭🇷Croatia
- 🇨🇾Cyprus
- 🇨🇿Czech Republic
- 🇩🇰Denmark
- 🇪🇪Estonia
- 🇫🇴Faroe Islands
- 🇫🇮Finland
- 🇫🇷France
- 🇩🇪Germany
- 🇬🇷Greece
- 🇭🇺Hungary
- 🇮🇸Island
- 🇮🇪Ireland
- 🇮🇹Italy
- 🇽🇰Kosovo
- 🇱🇮Liechtenstein
- 🇱🇹Lithuania
- 🇱🇺Luxembourg
- 🇲🇰North Macedonia
- 🇲🇹Malta
- 🇲🇩Moldova
- 🇲🇨Monaco
- 🇲🇪Montenegro
- 🇳🇱Netherlands
- 🇳🇴Norway
- 🇵🇱Poland
- 🇵🇹Portugal
- 🇷🇴Romania
- 🇷🇺Russia
- 🇷🇸Serbia
- 🇸🇰Slovakia
- 🇸🇮Slovenia
- 🇪🇸Spain
- 🇸🇪Sweden
- 🇨🇭Switzerland
- 🇺🇦Ukraine
- 🇬🇧United Kingdom
- 🇦🇩Andorra
What is Youth Unemployment Rate?
The Youth Unemployment Rate is a critical macroeconomic indicator that merits meticulous analysis, particularly for policymakers, educators, economists, and investors. At Eulerpool, where our focus is on providing comprehensive and data-driven insights into various facets of macroeconomic performance, the Youth Unemployment Rate stands out as a vital piece of the economic puzzle. The Youth Unemployment Rate measures the proportion of the labor force aged 15-24 that is unemployed but actively seeking employment and willing to work. This statistic offers an in-depth view of the employment landscape for young people and serves as an essential barometer of a nation's economic health and prospects for future growth. The importance of assessing the Youth Unemployment Rate cannot be overstated, as it reveals broader systemic issues and aligns closely with various socioeconomic parameters. One of the most significant implications of youth unemployment is its impact on overall economic stability. High rates of youth unemployment can indicate underlying weaknesses in an economy, such as insufficient job creation, mismatches between the skills of the labor force and the needs of employers, or broader economic malaise. For policymakers, understanding these underlying factors is crucial to formulating effective strategies and interventions. Investors and financial analysts also pay close attention to the Youth Unemployment Rate, as it provides insights into consumer spending patterns. Young people who are unemployed or underemployed tend to have reduced disposable income, which can dampen demand for goods and services. Consequently, companies that rely heavily on the consumer market for this age group may experience slower growth, making the Youth Unemployment Rate a valuable leading indicator for stock market performance. Educational institutions and training programs are directly influenced by trends in youth unemployment. A high unemployment rate among young people might necessitate education system reforms, such as curriculum adjustments to better match labor market requirements or enhanced vocational training programs. This link underscores the critical role that educational policy plays in shaping labor market outcomes. Socially and psychologically, the effects of youth unemployment can be profound. Extended periods of unemployment can lead to disenfranchisement and a loss of morale among young people, often resulting in long-term consequences such as reduced lifetime earnings and a diminished sense of purpose. Social scientists and psychologists frequently examine these impacts, advocating for policies and programs that support the mental and emotional well-being of unemployed youth. From a global perspective, the Youth Unemployment Rate varies significantly between developed and developing economies. In more developed countries, the rate tends to be managed through extensive social welfare systems, active labor market policies, youth targeted job creation programs, and robust educational frameworks. In contrast, developing economies face greater challenges, often contending with higher rates of youth unemployment due to rapid population growth, limited access to quality education, and slower economic development. In developed economies, the focus is often on integrating young people into the labor market as efficiently as possible. Programs such as internships, apprenticeships, and job placement services play an essential role in this integration. Importantly, structural changes in the economy, such as the transition to a more digitally focused job market, necessitate continuous adaptation of both educational curricula and job training programs to ensure they remain relevant. Developing economies, on the other hand, may need to address more fundamental issues. These include fostering economic environments conducive to job creation, improving access to education, and ensuring educational systems equip students with skills that are relevant to the current and future job market. Multilateral organizations and international development agencies often engage in this arena, offering technical and financial assistance to help these countries address their unique challenges. Technological advancements and globalization also exert significant influence on the Youth Unemployment Rate. Automation and artificial intelligence are reshaping the job market, potentially displacing certain types of work while creating new opportunities in tech and other high-skill industries. This dynamic necessitates a proactive approach to education and training, ensuring young people are equipped with skills that are in demand. Meanwhile, globalization has led to greater competition for jobs, often favoring those with higher levels of education and more adaptable skill sets. Economic downturns and recessions typically exacerbate youth unemployment. Young workers, often possessing less experience, are more vulnerable to layoffs and hiring freezes compared to their more seasoned counterparts. During such times, it becomes even more important for policymaking to address the specific needs of young job seekers, such as offering incentives for companies to hire and retain young workers or providing unemployment benefits and job training services. Certain demographic factors, such as gender and ethnicity, also play a significant role in youth unemployment. Research consistently shows disparities in unemployment rates among different demographic groups, influenced by factors such as discrimination, access to education, and socioeconomic background. Addressing these disparities is critical for ensuring equitable economic opportunities for all young people. Addressing youth unemployment requires a multifaceted approach that involves coordination between various stakeholders, including government agencies, educational institutions, businesses, and non-profits. Collaboration and strategic partnerships can help create more effective solutions that address both the supply and demand sides of the labor market. In conclusion, the Youth Unemployment Rate is a multifaceted economic indicator that offers valuable insights into the health of an economy, the effectiveness of educational systems, the impact of technological and global trends, and the well-being of young individuals. At Eulerpool, we understand the importance of this indicator and are committed to providing accurate and comprehensive data to support informed decision-making and foster sustainable economic development. Разeydfeutyfuyfeauf