Access the world's leading financial data and tools
Subscribe for $2 Island Balance of Trade
Price
The current value of the Balance of Trade in Island is 4.602 B ISK. The Balance of Trade in Island increased to 4.602 B ISK on 3/1/2015, after it was 3.562 B ISK on 1/1/2015. From 1/1/1960 to 7/1/2024, the average GDP in Island was -3.4 B ISK. The all-time high was reached on 12/1/2008 with 21.09 B ISK, while the lowest value was recorded on 10/1/2022 with -54.83 B ISK.
Balance of Trade ·
3 years
5 years
10 years
25 Years
Max
Trade Balance | |
---|---|
8/1/1960 | 250,000 ISK |
10/1/1960 | 640,000 ISK |
1/1/1961 | 410,000 ISK |
2/1/1961 | 450,000 ISK |
8/1/1961 | 360,000 ISK |
9/1/1961 | 470,000 ISK |
11/1/1961 | 620,000 ISK |
1/1/1962 | 790,000 ISK |
2/1/1962 | 500,000 ISK |
3/1/1962 | 630,000 ISK |
5/1/1962 | 190,000 ISK |
8/1/1962 | 60,000 ISK |
10/1/1962 | 210,000 ISK |
1/1/1963 | 690,000 ISK |
2/1/1963 | 160,000 ISK |
10/1/1963 | 120,000 ISK |
11/1/1963 | 1.69 M ISK |
1/1/1964 | 40,000 ISK |
2/1/1964 | 280,000 ISK |
3/1/1964 | 460,000 ISK |
9/1/1964 | 280,000 ISK |
10/1/1964 | 470,000 ISK |
11/1/1964 | 1.18 M ISK |
3/1/1965 | 620,000 ISK |
4/1/1965 | 800,000 ISK |
5/1/1965 | 350,000 ISK |
8/1/1965 | 740,000 ISK |
11/1/1965 | 20,000 ISK |
12/1/1965 | 1.03 M ISK |
3/1/1966 | 320,000 ISK |
11/1/1966 | 20,000 ISK |
12/1/1966 | 2.02 M ISK |
12/1/1968 | 1.51 M ISK |
6/1/1969 | 230,000 ISK |
8/1/1969 | 760,000 ISK |
12/1/1969 | 630,000 ISK |
7/1/1971 | 10 M ISK |
3/1/1973 | 10 M ISK |
5/1/1973 | 10 M ISK |
7/1/1976 | 20 M ISK |
9/1/1976 | 10 M ISK |
2/1/1977 | 10 M ISK |
3/1/1977 | 10 M ISK |
5/1/1977 | 10 M ISK |
8/1/1977 | 10 M ISK |
1/1/1978 | 10 M ISK |
7/1/1978 | 30 M ISK |
9/1/1978 | 10 M ISK |
10/1/1978 | 20 M ISK |
12/1/1978 | 40 M ISK |
4/1/1979 | 80 M ISK |
7/1/1979 | 40 M ISK |
8/1/1979 | 10 M ISK |
10/1/1979 | 30 M ISK |
12/1/1979 | 50 M ISK |
3/1/1980 | 20 M ISK |
4/1/1980 | 80 M ISK |
5/1/1980 | 20 M ISK |
8/1/1980 | 40 M ISK |
12/1/1980 | 130 M ISK |
4/1/1981 | 50 M ISK |
7/1/1981 | 40 M ISK |
12/1/1982 | 90 M ISK |
2/1/1983 | 260 M ISK |
6/1/1983 | 50 M ISK |
8/1/1983 | 280 M ISK |
9/1/1983 | 190 M ISK |
3/1/1984 | 90 M ISK |
10/1/1984 | 60 M ISK |
4/1/1985 | 70 M ISK |
7/1/1985 | 140 M ISK |
8/1/1985 | 480 M ISK |
12/1/1985 | 270 M ISK |
2/1/1986 | 230 M ISK |
4/1/1986 | 900 M ISK |
5/1/1986 | 480 M ISK |
8/1/1986 | 850 M ISK |
4/1/1987 | 1.74 B ISK |
7/1/1987 | 230 M ISK |
4/1/1988 | 870 M ISK |
9/1/1988 | 170 M ISK |
1/1/1989 | 209.2 M ISK |
2/1/1989 | 648.1 M ISK |
3/1/1989 | 595.9 M ISK |
4/1/1989 | 745.7 M ISK |
6/1/1989 | 533.9 M ISK |
7/1/1989 | 199.5 M ISK |
8/1/1989 | 1.02 B ISK |
1/1/1990 | 494.3 M ISK |
2/1/1990 | 590.1 M ISK |
3/1/1990 | 1.04 B ISK |
6/1/1990 | 762.2 M ISK |
7/1/1990 | 1.2 B ISK |
9/1/1990 | 1.09 B ISK |
3/1/1991 | 2.01 B ISK |
9/1/1991 | 136.9 M ISK |
3/1/1992 | 1.24 B ISK |
5/1/1992 | 1.93 B ISK |
8/1/1992 | 795.6 M ISK |
11/1/1992 | 317.7 M ISK |
1/1/1993 | 847.4 M ISK |
3/1/1993 | 1.29 B ISK |
4/1/1993 | 263.5 M ISK |
7/1/1993 | 1.64 B ISK |
9/1/1993 | 1.18 B ISK |
10/1/1993 | 1.17 B ISK |
12/1/1993 | 41.6 M ISK |
1/1/1994 | 1.63 B ISK |
2/1/1994 | 540.4 M ISK |
3/1/1994 | 4.65 B ISK |
4/1/1994 | 1.58 B ISK |
7/1/1994 | 504.7 M ISK |
9/1/1994 | 2.41 B ISK |
11/1/1994 | 1.81 B ISK |
12/1/1994 | 1.35 B ISK |
1/1/1995 | 1.19 B ISK |
2/1/1995 | 794.1 M ISK |
3/1/1995 | 1.81 B ISK |
4/1/1995 | 1.17 B ISK |
5/1/1995 | 1.41 B ISK |
8/1/1995 | 24 M ISK |
9/1/1995 | 736.7 M ISK |
11/1/1995 | 707.5 M ISK |
12/1/1995 | 22.8 M ISK |
2/1/1996 | 2.07 B ISK |
3/1/1996 | 1.82 B ISK |
8/1/1996 | 222.6 M ISK |
1/1/1997 | 359.2 M ISK |
3/1/1997 | 2.52 B ISK |
3/1/1999 | 943.3 M ISK |
4/1/2001 | 883.5 M ISK |
10/1/2001 | 813.7 M ISK |
11/1/2001 | 182.6 M ISK |
12/1/2001 | 3.1 B ISK |
1/1/2002 | 4.07 B ISK |
2/1/2002 | 1.6 B ISK |
4/1/2002 | 883.7 M ISK |
5/1/2002 | 1.13 B ISK |
8/1/2002 | 297.6 M ISK |
10/1/2002 | 492.3 M ISK |
1/1/2003 | 3.95 B ISK |
2/1/2003 | 846.7 M ISK |
9/1/2008 | 3.22 B ISK |
10/1/2008 | 8.07 B ISK |
12/1/2008 | 21.09 B ISK |
2/1/2009 | 8.21 B ISK |
3/1/2009 | 13.23 B ISK |
5/1/2009 | 4.73 B ISK |
6/1/2009 | 3.56 B ISK |
8/1/2009 | 9.52 B ISK |
9/1/2009 | 7.27 B ISK |
10/1/2009 | 9.49 B ISK |
12/1/2009 | 10.47 B ISK |
1/1/2010 | 2.96 B ISK |
2/1/2010 | 11.2 B ISK |
3/1/2010 | 8.1 B ISK |
4/1/2010 | 4.35 B ISK |
5/1/2010 | 13.25 B ISK |
6/1/2010 | 8.11 B ISK |
7/1/2010 | 924.2 M ISK |
8/1/2010 | 4.35 B ISK |
9/1/2010 | 7.54 B ISK |
10/1/2010 | 8.39 B ISK |
11/1/2010 | 3.73 B ISK |
12/1/2010 | 11.11 B ISK |
1/1/2011 | 4.29 B ISK |
2/1/2011 | 5.69 B ISK |
3/1/2011 | 10.44 B ISK |
4/1/2011 | 220.1 M ISK |
5/1/2011 | 1.9 B ISK |
6/1/2011 | 5.63 B ISK |
7/1/2011 | 6.3 B ISK |
8/1/2011 | 5.77 B ISK |
9/1/2011 | 12.22 B ISK |
10/1/2011 | 4.74 B ISK |
11/1/2011 | 4.29 B ISK |
2/1/2012 | 9.2 B ISK |
3/1/2012 | 1.32 B ISK |
4/1/2012 | 5.79 B ISK |
8/1/2012 | 10.55 B ISK |
9/1/2012 | 5.55 B ISK |
10/1/2012 | 11.17 B ISK |
11/1/2012 | 5.78 B ISK |
12/1/2012 | 856.7 M ISK |
1/1/2013 | 7.61 B ISK |
2/1/2013 | 2.68 B ISK |
3/1/2013 | 45.3 M ISK |
7/1/2013 | 1.58 B ISK |
8/1/2013 | 3.11 B ISK |
10/1/2013 | 4.28 B ISK |
11/1/2013 | 7.93 B ISK |
1/1/2014 | 4.58 B ISK |
5/1/2014 | 1.74 B ISK |
8/1/2014 | 12.4 M ISK |
10/1/2014 | 8.36 B ISK |
11/1/2014 | 2.32 B ISK |
12/1/2014 | 505.9 M ISK |
1/1/2015 | 3.56 B ISK |
3/1/2015 | 4.6 B ISK |
Balance of Trade History
Date | Value |
---|---|
3/1/2015 | 4.602 B ISK |
1/1/2015 | 3.562 B ISK |
12/1/2014 | 505.9 M ISK |
11/1/2014 | 2.32 B ISK |
10/1/2014 | 8.361 B ISK |
8/1/2014 | 12.4 M ISK |
5/1/2014 | 1.736 B ISK |
1/1/2014 | 4.583 B ISK |
11/1/2013 | 7.931 B ISK |
10/1/2013 | 4.281 B ISK |
Similar Macro Indicators to Balance of Trade
Name | Current | Previous | Frequency |
---|---|---|---|
🇮🇸 Capital Flows | 3.45 B ISK | 69.809 B ISK | Quarter |
🇮🇸 Current Account | -40.808 B ISK | -29.153 B ISK | Quarter |
🇮🇸 Current Account to GDP | 0.9 % of GDP | -1.7 % of GDP | Annually |
🇮🇸 Exports | 88.899 B ISK | 72.851 B ISK | Monthly |
🇮🇸 Foreign debt | 3.358 T ISK | 3.123 T ISK | Quarter |
🇮🇸 Foreign Direct Investments | 21.19 B ISK | -2.312 B ISK | Quarter |
🇮🇸 Gold reserves | 1.98 Tonnes | 1.98 Tonnes | Quarter |
🇮🇸 Imports | 109.706 B ISK | 119.254 B ISK | Monthly |
🇮🇸 Terrorism Index | 0.233 Points | 0 Points | Annually |
🇮🇸 Tourist arrivals | 173,295 | 156,360 | Monthly |
🇮🇸 Transfers | 2.135 B ISK | 2.334 B ISK | Quarter |
Iceland's trade deficit widened to ISK 231.8 billion in 2021 from ISK 145.3 billion in 2020. The total value of exports of goods increased by 21.8% to ISK 136.2 billion. Exports of aluminum and aluminum products constituted the largest share in exported manufacturing products with 37.3% of total exports. Marine products contributed to 38.8% of the total exports, marking a 7.4% increase compared to 2020. Among marine products, fresh fish and frozen fish fillets had the predominant share. The largest trading partners for goods exports were the Netherlands, Spain, and the United Kingdom, with 68.8% of all exports directed to EEA countries. Meanwhile, imports rose at a faster rate of 28.9%, reaching ISK 222.8 billion. The increase was primarily driven by transport equipment and capital goods. The largest import categories were industrial supplies (28.8%) and capital goods (22.2%). The principal countries from which goods were imported in 2021 were Norway, China, and Germany. Over 58% of the total value of imports came from EEA countries.
Macro pages for other countries in Europe
- 🇦🇱Albania
- 🇦🇹Austria
- 🇧🇾Belarus
- 🇧🇪Belgium
- 🇧🇦Bosnia and Herzegovina
- 🇧🇬Bulgaria
- 🇭🇷Croatia
- 🇨🇾Cyprus
- 🇨🇿Czech Republic
- 🇩🇰Denmark
- 🇪🇪Estonia
- 🇫🇴Faroe Islands
- 🇫🇮Finland
- 🇫🇷France
- 🇩🇪Germany
- 🇬🇷Greece
- 🇭🇺Hungary
- 🇮🇪Ireland
- 🇮🇹Italy
- 🇽🇰Kosovo
- 🇱🇻Latvia
- 🇱🇮Liechtenstein
- 🇱🇹Lithuania
- 🇱🇺Luxembourg
- 🇲🇰North Macedonia
- 🇲🇹Malta
- 🇲🇩Moldova
- 🇲🇨Monaco
- 🇲🇪Montenegro
- 🇳🇱Netherlands
- 🇳🇴Norway
- 🇵🇱Poland
- 🇵🇹Portugal
- 🇷🇴Romania
- 🇷🇺Russia
- 🇷🇸Serbia
- 🇸🇰Slovakia
- 🇸🇮Slovenia
- 🇪🇸Spain
- 🇸🇪Sweden
- 🇨🇭Switzerland
- 🇺🇦Ukraine
- 🇬🇧United Kingdom
- 🇦🇩Andorra
What is Balance of Trade?
Balance of Trade: A Critical Examination of an Economy's Trade Health At Eulerpool, we understand the pivotal role macroeconomic indicators play in evaluating a nation's economic health and strategic positioning in the global marketplace. One such indispensable economic metric is the Balance of Trade (BOT). This parameter not only offers insights into a country's economic stability but also significantly influences policy-making and international economic relations. A thorough comprehension of the Balance of Trade is essential for economists, policymakers, investors, and business strategists alike. This comprehensive description aims to demystify the concept, implications, and intricacies of the Balance of Trade for our discerning audience. The Balance of Trade, often referred to as the trade balance, is a key component of a country’s balance of payments. It represents the difference between the monetary value of a nation's exports and imports over a specified period, usually a fiscal quarter or year. Simply put, the BOT measures whether a country exports more goods and services than it imports, or vice versa. If its exports exceed its imports, the country is said to have a trade surplus. Conversely, if imports surpass exports, the country experiences a trade deficit. A trade surplus is generally perceived as positive because it indicates that a country is selling more goods and services to foreign markets than it is buying from them. This influx of foreign currency can bolster a nation’s reserves, potentially leading to a stronger national currency and enhanced purchasing power on the global stage. A sustained trade surplus can embolden a country’s economic position, enabling it to exert considerable influence in international trade negotiations and geopolitical affairs. On the flip side, a trade deficit is often viewed with concern, as it suggests that a country is dependent on foreign goods and services. This reliance can lead to the outflow of domestic currency, depletion of foreign reserves, and, potentially, weakening of the national currency. Persistent trade deficits may signify underlying economic issues, such as inadequate production capabilities, competitiveness challenges, or inefficiencies in certain sectors. Policymakers and economists scrutinize trade deficits to devise strategies that stimulate domestic production, enhance export potential, and reduce reliance on imports. However, it’s important to contextualize that a trade deficit isn’t inherently detrimental and can, under certain conditions, reflect a burgeoning economy. In the short term, a trade deficit might indicate that a country is importing capital goods to build infrastructure, invest in technology, or enhance productivity, thereby setting the stage for future economic growth. Moreover, consumer-oriented economies often exhibit trade deficits as their populations demand a diverse range of goods and services, implying a robust internal market. The trade balance interlinks intricately with a plethora of macroeconomic variables, such as the exchange rate, inflation, interest rates, and employment levels. Fluctuations in the exchange rate immediately impact the BOT. A strong national currency makes exports costlier and imports cheaper, potentially leading to a trade deficit. Conversely, a weaker currency can bolster exports by making them more competitively priced on the global market, while making imports more expensive and thus less attractive. Central banks often intervene in foreign exchange markets to stabilize their currencies and influence the BOT effectively. Inflation impacts the Balance of Trade as well. Higher inflation rates in a country compared to its trading partners reduce the competitiveness of its goods and services, leading to a decline in exports and an increase in imports, thereby worsening the trade balance. Conversely, lower prices can enhance export competitiveness, potentially improving the trade balance. Interest rates also play a pivotal role. High interest rates attract foreign investment, appreciating the national currency and impacting the trade balance by making exports dearer and imports cheaper. In contrast, lower interest rates can devalue the national currency, aiding in improved export performance. Employment levels within a country are intricately tied to its trade balance. High employment rates indicate a productive economy, potentially leading to higher exports and an improved trade balance. Conversely, high unemployment can stymie production capabilities, disrupt supply chains, and result in a deficit as imports fill the void created by lower domestic production. It is crucial to note that persistent imbalances in trade, whether surpluses or deficits, can lead to economic repercussions that reverberate globally. Large, persistent trade surpluses may incite protectionist measures from trading partners, leading to trade wars, tariffs, and sanctions. On the other hand, sustained trade deficits can provoke debt accumulation, escalating to a debt crisis, currency devaluation, or economic instability. In analyzing the Balance of Trade, it is imperative to assess both the balance of goods and the balance of services. While goods traditionally form a significant part of the trade balance, services are increasingly becoming vital contributors in the digital economy. Financial services, intellectual property, tourism, and other service-oriented sectors are crucial in understanding a comprehensive BOT scenario. At Eulerpool, our commitment to delivering precise, real-time macroeconomic data allows users to delve deep into the Balance of Trade metrics. By offering granular data visualization tools and analytical frameworks, we empower our users to interpret the trade balance not just as an isolated figure, but as a dynamic indicator influenced by multifaceted economic activities. Our platform facilitates historical data analysis, comparative studies, and predictive modeling to equip economists, researchers, and strategists with the insight necessary to make informed decisions. In conclusion, the Balance of Trade stands as a fundamental barometer of economic health, influencing and reflecting a myriad of economic conditions and policies. Understanding its nuances provides invaluable insights into a nation's economic strategies and global standing. As the world becomes increasingly interconnected, the BOT’s significance continues to escalate, making its analysis essential for informed economic decision-making. At Eulerpool, we are dedicated to providing the tools and data necessary for thorough and insightful BOT analysis, aiding our users in navigating the intricate landscape of global economics with confidence and precision.