Access the world's leading financial data and tools
Subscribe for $2 Luxembourg Labour Costs
Price
The current value of the Labour Costs in Luxembourg is 195.131 Points. The Labour Costs in Luxembourg increased to 195.131 Points on 12/1/2023, after it was 131.614 Points on 11/1/2023. From 1/1/2005 to 1/1/2024, the average GDP in Luxembourg was 112.64 Points. The all-time high was reached on 12/1/2023 with 195.13 Points, while the lowest value was recorded on 9/1/2005 with 85.9 Points.
Labour Costs ·
3 years
5 years
10 years
25 Years
Max
Labor costs | |
---|---|
1/1/2005 | 95.4 points |
2/1/2005 | 99.5 points |
3/1/2005 | 93.2 points |
4/1/2005 | 97.4 points |
5/1/2005 | 108.2 points |
6/1/2005 | 99.3 points |
7/1/2005 | 87.7 points |
8/1/2005 | 110.6 points |
9/1/2005 | 85.9 points |
10/1/2005 | 90.5 points |
11/1/2005 | 105.9 points |
12/1/2005 | 133.1 points |
1/1/2006 | 95.1 points |
2/1/2006 | 100 points |
3/1/2006 | 92.2 points |
4/1/2006 | 101.9 points |
5/1/2006 | 104.6 points |
6/1/2006 | 101.4 points |
7/1/2006 | 93.9 points |
8/1/2006 | 111.8 points |
9/1/2006 | 88.4 points |
10/1/2006 | 92.4 points |
11/1/2006 | 101 points |
12/1/2006 | 139 points |
1/1/2007 | 93.8 points |
2/1/2007 | 99.1 points |
3/1/2007 | 91.7 points |
4/1/2007 | 99.9 points |
5/1/2007 | 112.2 points |
6/1/2007 | 96.7 points |
7/1/2007 | 97.2 points |
8/1/2007 | 119.3 points |
9/1/2007 | 103.9 points |
10/1/2007 | 90.9 points |
11/1/2007 | 111.2 points |
12/1/2007 | 141.5 points |
1/1/2008 | 97.8 points |
2/1/2008 | 97.4 points |
3/1/2008 | 101 points |
4/1/2008 | 102.5 points |
5/1/2008 | 118 points |
6/1/2008 | 109.5 points |
7/1/2008 | 99.6 points |
8/1/2008 | 122 points |
9/1/2008 | 98.2 points |
10/1/2008 | 101.1 points |
11/1/2008 | 135.1 points |
12/1/2008 | 189 points |
1/1/2009 | 126.3 points |
2/1/2009 | 130.1 points |
3/1/2009 | 129.9 points |
4/1/2009 | 132.8 points |
5/1/2009 | 146.4 points |
6/1/2009 | 125.1 points |
7/1/2009 | 117.4 points |
8/1/2009 | 142.5 points |
9/1/2009 | 99.5 points |
10/1/2009 | 102.3 points |
11/1/2009 | 127.9 points |
12/1/2009 | 160.6 points |
1/1/2010 | 117.4 points |
2/1/2010 | 115.3 points |
3/1/2010 | 107.5 points |
4/1/2010 | 113.1 points |
5/1/2010 | 120.7 points |
6/1/2010 | 116.6 points |
7/1/2010 | 114.9 points |
8/1/2010 | 133.1 points |
9/1/2010 | 109.5 points |
10/1/2010 | 107.1 points |
11/1/2010 | 119 points |
12/1/2010 | 150.4 points |
1/1/2011 | 113.7 points |
2/1/2011 | 114.1 points |
3/1/2011 | 116.8 points |
4/1/2011 | 118.6 points |
5/1/2011 | 118.9 points |
6/1/2011 | 131.2 points |
7/1/2011 | 125.7 points |
8/1/2011 | 133 points |
9/1/2011 | 116.3 points |
10/1/2011 | 114.7 points |
11/1/2011 | 144.1 points |
12/1/2011 | 181.9 points |
1/1/2012 | 103.56 points |
2/1/2012 | 102.57 points |
3/1/2012 | 94.78 points |
4/1/2012 | 101.71 points |
5/1/2012 | 106.06 points |
6/1/2012 | 98.38 points |
7/1/2012 | 94.91 points |
8/1/2012 | 119.53 points |
9/1/2012 | 97 points |
10/1/2012 | 94.5 points |
11/1/2012 | 125.63 points |
12/1/2012 | 138.11 points |
1/1/2013 | 110.89 points |
2/1/2013 | 106.33 points |
3/1/2013 | 108.95 points |
4/1/2013 | 110.25 points |
5/1/2013 | 115.89 points |
6/1/2013 | 113.55 points |
7/1/2013 | 101.91 points |
8/1/2013 | 121.29 points |
9/1/2013 | 98.69 points |
10/1/2013 | 95.58 points |
11/1/2013 | 120.79 points |
12/1/2013 | 130.01 points |
1/1/2014 | 109.96 points |
2/1/2014 | 102.06 points |
3/1/2014 | 97.62 points |
4/1/2014 | 107.57 points |
5/1/2014 | 105.21 points |
6/1/2014 | 111.08 points |
7/1/2014 | 100.29 points |
8/1/2014 | 121.59 points |
9/1/2014 | 94.03 points |
10/1/2014 | 94.24 points |
11/1/2014 | 119.75 points |
12/1/2014 | 132.08 points |
1/1/2015 | 108.59 points |
2/1/2015 | 101.69 points |
3/1/2015 | 98.28 points |
4/1/2015 | 105.32 points |
5/1/2015 | 106.75 points |
6/1/2015 | 104 points |
7/1/2015 | 105.65 points |
8/1/2015 | 115.24 points |
9/1/2015 | 100.94 points |
10/1/2015 | 92.42 points |
11/1/2015 | 112.18 points |
12/1/2015 | 139.22 points |
1/1/2016 | 104.85 points |
2/1/2016 | 97.2 points |
3/1/2016 | 99.07 points |
4/1/2016 | 109.2 points |
5/1/2016 | 105.67 points |
6/1/2016 | 99.01 points |
7/1/2016 | 102.42 points |
8/1/2016 | 123 points |
9/1/2016 | 98.13 points |
10/1/2016 | 99.05 points |
11/1/2016 | 121.06 points |
12/1/2016 | 143.25 points |
1/1/2017 | 102.52 points |
2/1/2017 | 98.61 points |
3/1/2017 | 95.34 points |
4/1/2017 | 106.12 points |
5/1/2017 | 99.86 points |
6/1/2017 | 97.73 points |
7/1/2017 | 101.17 points |
8/1/2017 | 108 points |
9/1/2017 | 92.73 points |
10/1/2017 | 91.05 points |
11/1/2017 | 102.58 points |
12/1/2017 | 125.52 points |
1/1/2018 | 96.62 points |
2/1/2018 | 97.87 points |
3/1/2018 | 95.54 points |
4/1/2018 | 102.72 points |
5/1/2018 | 100.13 points |
6/1/2018 | 98.15 points |
7/1/2018 | 99.01 points |
8/1/2018 | 111.72 points |
9/1/2018 | 98.19 points |
10/1/2018 | 90.11 points |
11/1/2018 | 101.19 points |
12/1/2018 | 146.01 points |
1/1/2019 | 102.43 points |
2/1/2019 | 101.39 points |
3/1/2019 | 98.97 points |
4/1/2019 | 103.1 points |
5/1/2019 | 104.78 points |
6/1/2019 | 107.86 points |
7/1/2019 | 104.59 points |
8/1/2019 | 115.15 points |
9/1/2019 | 99.72 points |
10/1/2019 | 96.82 points |
11/1/2019 | 109.55 points |
12/1/2019 | 165.07 points |
1/1/2020 | 110.3 points |
2/1/2020 | 105.38 points |
3/1/2020 | 115.03 points |
4/1/2020 | 144.93 points |
5/1/2020 | 128.34 points |
6/1/2020 | 115.11 points |
7/1/2020 | 111.9 points |
8/1/2020 | 127.58 points |
9/1/2020 | 103.64 points |
10/1/2020 | 99.61 points |
11/1/2020 | 110.75 points |
12/1/2020 | 161.32 points |
1/1/2021 | 111.3 points |
2/1/2021 | 107.99 points |
3/1/2021 | 101.66 points |
4/1/2021 | 103.39 points |
5/1/2021 | 115.25 points |
6/1/2021 | 107.72 points |
7/1/2021 | 109.27 points |
8/1/2021 | 119.34 points |
9/1/2021 | 101.98 points |
10/1/2021 | 104.03 points |
11/1/2021 | 111.32 points |
12/1/2021 | 152.89 points |
1/1/2022 | 109.69 points |
2/1/2022 | 107.27 points |
3/1/2022 | 114.07 points |
4/1/2022 | 115.3 points |
5/1/2022 | 119.78 points |
6/1/2022 | 118.52 points |
7/1/2022 | 118.34 points |
8/1/2022 | 129.78 points |
9/1/2022 | 107.06 points |
10/1/2022 | 110.42 points |
11/1/2022 | 116.99 points |
12/1/2022 | 172.81 points |
1/1/2023 | 123.36 points |
2/1/2023 | 117.1 points |
3/1/2023 | 116.3 points |
4/1/2023 | 134.31 points |
5/1/2023 | 140.23 points |
6/1/2023 | 130.32 points |
7/1/2023 | 133.2 points |
8/1/2023 | 145.87 points |
9/1/2023 | 130.07 points |
10/1/2023 | 122.29 points |
11/1/2023 | 131.61 points |
12/1/2023 | 195.13 points |
Labour Costs History
Date | Value |
---|---|
12/1/2023 | 195.131 Points |
11/1/2023 | 131.614 Points |
10/1/2023 | 122.291 Points |
9/1/2023 | 130.07 Points |
8/1/2023 | 145.875 Points |
7/1/2023 | 133.199 Points |
6/1/2023 | 130.322 Points |
5/1/2023 | 140.226 Points |
4/1/2023 | 134.315 Points |
3/1/2023 | 116.305 Points |
Similar Macro Indicators to Labour Costs
Name | Current | Previous | Frequency |
---|---|---|---|
🇱🇺 Employed persons | 518,895 | 518,017 | Monthly |
🇱🇺 Employment Change | 0.2 % | 0.4 % | Quarter |
🇱🇺 Employment rate | 69.8 % | 69.1 % | Quarter |
🇱🇺 Full-time employment | 264,600 | 256,900 | Quarter |
🇱🇺 Job Opportunities | 3,090 | 3,489 | Monthly |
🇱🇺 Job Vacancy Rate | 1.5 % | 1.5 % | Quarter |
🇱🇺 Labor force participation rate | 61.7 % | 61.7 % | Quarter |
🇱🇺 Long-term unemployment rate | 1.5 % | 1.6 % | Quarter |
🇱🇺 Minimum Wages | 2,570.93 EUR/Month | 2,570.93 EUR/Month | Quarter |
🇱🇺 Part-time work | 53,000 | 54,400 | Quarter |
🇱🇺 Population | 660,000 | 650,000 | Annually |
🇱🇺 Productivity | 93.888 points | 97.528 points | Quarter |
🇱🇺 Retirement Age Men | 65 Years | 65 Years | Annually |
🇱🇺 Retirement Age Women | 65 Years | 65 Years | Annually |
🇱🇺 Unemployed Persons | 17,083 | 17,470 | Monthly |
🇱🇺 Unemployment Rate | 5.7 % | 5.7 % | Monthly |
🇱🇺 Wages | 6,307.6 EUR/Month | 6,026.9 EUR/Month | Annually |
🇱🇺 Wages in Manufacturing | 115 points | 155.4 points | Monthly |
🇱🇺 Youth Unemployment Rate | 19.4 % | 19.6 % | Monthly |
Macro pages for other countries in Europe
- 🇦🇱Albania
- 🇦🇹Austria
- 🇧🇾Belarus
- 🇧🇪Belgium
- 🇧🇦Bosnia and Herzegovina
- 🇧🇬Bulgaria
- 🇭🇷Croatia
- 🇨🇾Cyprus
- 🇨🇿Czech Republic
- 🇩🇰Denmark
- 🇪🇪Estonia
- 🇫🇴Faroe Islands
- 🇫🇮Finland
- 🇫🇷France
- 🇩🇪Germany
- 🇬🇷Greece
- 🇭🇺Hungary
- 🇮🇸Island
- 🇮🇪Ireland
- 🇮🇹Italy
- 🇽🇰Kosovo
- 🇱🇻Latvia
- 🇱🇮Liechtenstein
- 🇱🇹Lithuania
- 🇲🇰North Macedonia
- 🇲🇹Malta
- 🇲🇩Moldova
- 🇲🇨Monaco
- 🇲🇪Montenegro
- 🇳🇱Netherlands
- 🇳🇴Norway
- 🇵🇱Poland
- 🇵🇹Portugal
- 🇷🇴Romania
- 🇷🇺Russia
- 🇷🇸Serbia
- 🇸🇰Slovakia
- 🇸🇮Slovenia
- 🇪🇸Spain
- 🇸🇪Sweden
- 🇨🇭Switzerland
- 🇺🇦Ukraine
- 🇬🇧United Kingdom
- 🇦🇩Andorra
What is Labour Costs?
Labour Costs: A Comprehensive Insight The study of labor costs forms a critical aspect of macroeconomic analysis and understanding. At Eulerpool, our dedication to providing precise and comprehensive macroeconomic data has positioned us as a key resource for understanding various economic indicators, including labor costs. This analysis not only helps economists and policymakers but also provides invaluable insights for businesses, investors, and academic researchers. Labor costs, in essence, represent the total expenses borne by employers to compensate their workforce. These costs encompass not just salaries and wages but also other associated expenses such as benefits, taxes, bonuses, and in some cases, training and development costs. Understanding labor costs within an economy is pivotal because it reflects how efficiently the labor market operates, influences business decisions, affects competitiveness, and plays a prominent role in shaping economic policy. To begin with, labor costs can be broadly divided into two categories: direct and indirect costs. Direct labor costs primarily include wages, salaries, and any additional monetary compensation promised to the employees. Indirect labor costs, on the other hand, hinge heavily on supplementary benefits such as health insurance, retirement benefits, social security taxes, paid leave, and other employee perks and amenities. An exhaustive analysis of labor costs must account for both these dimensions to provide a holistic understanding of the economic picture. A high labor cost can indicate a well-compensated workforce, which often correlates with higher living standards, greater consumer spending, and economic growth. However, if labor costs rise faster than productivity, it can lead to inflationary pressures and decreased competitiveness of businesses on a global scale. Hence, labor costs have a dual-edge effect on the economy, providing both potential benefits and challenges. From the standpoint of enterprises, labor costs are a significant part of the operating expenses, often accounting for the largest share of the total costs in labor-intensive industries. A deep dive into labor costs helps businesses optimize their workforce management. By analyzing labor cost patterns, businesses can make informed decisions regarding hiring, wage adjustments, and investments in staff training to ensure maximum productivity and cost efficiency. For policymakers, labor cost statistics are paramount when devising fiscal and monetary policies. High labor costs might prompt policymakers to implement measures aimed at boosting productivity, such as investing in education and skills development, or encouraging technological advancements. Conversely, low labor costs may indicate underemployment or wage suppression, prompting interventions to stimulate wage growth and improve labor market conditions. Understanding labor costs also involves delving into various underlying factors that impact these costs. Economic conditions, labor market policies, collective bargaining agreements, consumer price index, and labor productivity are some of the key determinants. For instance, in a tight labor market with low unemployment rates, labor costs are likely to rise as employers compete to attract and retain talent. On the contrary, in scenarios of high unemployment, labor costs might stagnate or even decrease as the supply of available workers exceeds demand. Globalization has further added layers of complexity to the analysis of labor costs. With industries increasingly operating on an international scale, the comparison of labor costs across different regions and countries becomes pertinent. Businesses often make strategic decisions on location and outsourcing based on the labor cost dynamics of various geographies. Therefore, a granular analysis of international labor cost trends can provide strategic insights for multinational corporations looking to optimize their labor expenditures. Additionally, the rise of the gig economy and remote work have introduced new paradigms in the labor cost dynamics. The flexibility offered by gig and remote work arrangements has implications for both direct and indirect labor costs. Employers may save on office space and related overheads while potentially facing new challenges in managing a dispersed and diverse workforce. At Eulerpool, our commitment to accuracy and depth ensures that our labor cost data is meticulously collected, analyzed, and presented. By offering a comprehensive view of labor cost trends, factors influencing these costs, and their broader economic implications, we strive to be an indispensable resource for all stakeholders seeking to understand this critical economic indicator. Our data services encompass historical labor cost trends, real-time analytics, and predictive modeling to cater to a wide range of needs. Whether you are an economist, policymaker, business leader, investor, or researcher, leveraging our robust database allows you to gain granular insights, identify emerging trends, and make well-informed decisions. In conclusion, comprehensively grasping the nuances of labor costs is essential for a myriad of economic, business, and policy decisions. With Eulerpool’s expertise and extensive data resources, stakeholders are well-equipped to navigate the complexities of labor cost analysis, gaining the critical insights necessary to foster sustainable economic growth and competitiveness.