Access the world's leading financial data and tools
Subscribe for $2 Russia National Wealth Fund Assets to Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
Price
The current value of the National Wealth Fund Assets to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in Russia is 7 % of GDP. The National Wealth Fund Assets to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in Russia increased to 7 % of GDP on 3/1/2024, after it was 6.8 % of GDP on 2/1/2024. From 1/1/2008 to 4/1/2024, the average GDP in Russia was 6.14 % of GDP. The all-time high was reached on 9/1/2020 with 12.8 % of GDP, while the lowest value was recorded on 1/1/2008 with 1.9 % of GDP.
National Wealth Fund Assets to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) ·
3 years
5 years
10 years
25 Years
Max
National Wealth Fund Assets to GDP | |
---|---|
1/1/2008 | 1.9 % of GDP |
2/1/2008 | 1.9 % of GDP |
3/1/2008 | 1.9 % of GDP |
4/1/2008 | 1.9 % of GDP |
5/1/2008 | 1.9 % of GDP |
6/1/2008 | 1.9 % of GDP |
7/1/2008 | 1.9 % of GDP |
8/1/2008 | 1.9 % of GDP |
9/1/2008 | 3 % of GDP |
10/1/2008 | 4 % of GDP |
11/1/2008 | 5.1 % of GDP |
12/1/2008 | 6.3 % of GDP |
1/1/2009 | 7.7 % of GDP |
2/1/2009 | 7.7 % of GDP |
3/1/2009 | 7.5 % of GDP |
4/1/2009 | 7.4 % of GDP |
5/1/2009 | 7.2 % of GDP |
6/1/2009 | 7.3 % of GDP |
7/1/2009 | 7.4 % of GDP |
8/1/2009 | 7.4 % of GDP |
9/1/2009 | 7.1 % of GDP |
10/1/2009 | 7 % of GDP |
11/1/2009 | 7.1 % of GDP |
12/1/2009 | 7.1 % of GDP |
1/1/2010 | 6 % of GDP |
2/1/2010 | 5.8 % of GDP |
3/1/2010 | 5.7 % of GDP |
4/1/2010 | 5.6 % of GDP |
5/1/2010 | 5.7 % of GDP |
6/1/2010 | 5.8 % of GDP |
7/1/2010 | 5.8 % of GDP |
8/1/2010 | 5.8 % of GDP |
9/1/2010 | 5.9 % of GDP |
10/1/2010 | 6 % of GDP |
11/1/2010 | 6 % of GDP |
12/1/2010 | 5.8 % of GDP |
1/1/2011 | 4.4 % of GDP |
2/1/2011 | 4.4 % of GDP |
3/1/2011 | 4.3 % of GDP |
4/1/2011 | 4.3 % of GDP |
5/1/2011 | 4.3 % of GDP |
6/1/2011 | 4.3 % of GDP |
7/1/2011 | 4.3 % of GDP |
8/1/2011 | 4.4 % of GDP |
9/1/2011 | 4.7 % of GDP |
10/1/2011 | 4.5 % of GDP |
11/1/2011 | 4.6 % of GDP |
12/1/2011 | 4.6 % of GDP |
1/1/2012 | 3.9 % of GDP |
2/1/2012 | 3.8 % of GDP |
3/1/2012 | 3.9 % of GDP |
4/1/2012 | 3.8 % of GDP |
5/1/2012 | 4.1 % of GDP |
6/1/2012 | 4.1 % of GDP |
7/1/2012 | 4 % of GDP |
8/1/2012 | 4.1 % of GDP |
9/1/2012 | 4 % of GDP |
10/1/2012 | 4 % of GDP |
11/1/2012 | 4 % of GDP |
12/1/2012 | 4 % of GDP |
1/1/2013 | 3.7 % of GDP |
2/1/2013 | 3.7 % of GDP |
3/1/2013 | 3.7 % of GDP |
4/1/2013 | 3.7 % of GDP |
5/1/2013 | 3.8 % of GDP |
6/1/2013 | 3.9 % of GDP |
7/1/2013 | 3.9 % of GDP |
8/1/2013 | 4 % of GDP |
9/1/2013 | 3.9 % of GDP |
10/1/2013 | 3.9 % of GDP |
11/1/2013 | 4 % of GDP |
12/1/2013 | 4 % of GDP |
1/1/2014 | 4 % of GDP |
2/1/2014 | 4 % of GDP |
3/1/2014 | 4 % of GDP |
4/1/2014 | 4 % of GDP |
5/1/2014 | 3.8 % of GDP |
6/1/2014 | 3.7 % of GDP |
7/1/2014 | 3.9 % of GDP |
8/1/2014 | 4 % of GDP |
9/1/2014 | 4.1 % of GDP |
10/1/2014 | 4.5 % of GDP |
11/1/2014 | 5 % of GDP |
12/1/2014 | 5.3 % of GDP |
1/1/2015 | 6.1 % of GDP |
2/1/2015 | 5.5 % of GDP |
3/1/2015 | 5.2 % of GDP |
4/1/2015 | 4.7 % of GDP |
5/1/2015 | 4.8 % of GDP |
6/1/2015 | 5.1 % of GDP |
7/1/2015 | 5.3 % of GDP |
8/1/2015 | 5.9 % of GDP |
9/1/2015 | 5.9 % of GDP |
10/1/2015 | 5.7 % of GDP |
11/1/2015 | 5.8 % of GDP |
12/1/2015 | 6.1 % of GDP |
1/1/2016 | 6.2 % of GDP |
2/1/2016 | 6.3 % of GDP |
3/1/2016 | 5.8 % of GDP |
4/1/2016 | 5.5 % of GDP |
5/1/2016 | 5.6 % of GDP |
6/1/2016 | 5.5 % of GDP |
7/1/2016 | 5.7 % of GDP |
8/1/2016 | 5.5 % of GDP |
9/1/2016 | 5.4 % of GDP |
10/1/2016 | 5.3 % of GDP |
11/1/2016 | 5.4 % of GDP |
12/1/2016 | 4.7 % of GDP |
1/1/2017 | 4.7 % of GDP |
2/1/2017 | 4.6 % of GDP |
3/1/2017 | 4.5 % of GDP |
4/1/2017 | 4.5 % of GDP |
5/1/2017 | 4.5 % of GDP |
6/1/2017 | 4.8 % of GDP |
7/1/2017 | 4.8 % of GDP |
8/1/2017 | 4.8 % of GDP |
9/1/2017 | 4.6 % of GDP |
10/1/2017 | 4.4 % of GDP |
11/1/2017 | 4.3 % of GDP |
12/1/2017 | 3.6 % of GDP |
1/1/2018 | 3.6 % of GDP |
2/1/2018 | 3.6 % of GDP |
3/1/2018 | 3.6 % of GDP |
4/1/2018 | 3.8 % of GDP |
5/1/2018 | 3.8 % of GDP |
6/1/2018 | 4.7 % of GDP |
7/1/2018 | 4.7 % of GDP |
8/1/2018 | 5 % of GDP |
9/1/2018 | 4.8 % of GDP |
10/1/2018 | 4.8 % of GDP |
11/1/2018 | 4.4 % of GDP |
12/1/2018 | 3.7 % of GDP |
1/1/2019 | 3.6 % of GDP |
2/1/2019 | 3.5 % of GDP |
3/1/2019 | 3.5 % of GDP |
4/1/2019 | 3.5 % of GDP |
5/1/2019 | 3.5 % of GDP |
6/1/2019 | 3.4 % of GDP |
7/1/2019 | 7.2 % of GDP |
8/1/2019 | 7.5 % of GDP |
9/1/2019 | 7.2 % of GDP |
10/1/2019 | 7.3 % of GDP |
11/1/2019 | 7.2 % of GDP |
12/1/2019 | 7.2 % of GDP |
1/1/2020 | 7.3 % of GDP |
2/1/2020 | 7.7 % of GDP |
3/1/2020 | 12 % of GDP |
4/1/2020 | 11.6 % of GDP |
5/1/2020 | 11.3 % of GDP |
6/1/2020 | 11.3 % of GDP |
7/1/2020 | 12.1 % of GDP |
8/1/2020 | 12.4 % of GDP |
9/1/2020 | 12.8 % of GDP |
10/1/2020 | 12.4 % of GDP |
11/1/2020 | 12.5 % of GDP |
12/1/2020 | 11.7 % of GDP |
1/1/2021 | 11.8 % of GDP |
2/1/2021 | 11.7 % of GDP |
3/1/2021 | 11.9 % of GDP |
4/1/2021 | 12 % of GDP |
5/1/2021 | 12.1 % of GDP |
6/1/2021 | 11.7 % of GDP |
7/1/2021 | 11.9 % of GDP |
8/1/2021 | 12.1 % of GDP |
9/1/2021 | 12 % of GDP |
10/1/2021 | 12.1 % of GDP |
11/1/2021 | 12 % of GDP |
12/1/2021 | 11.7 % of GDP |
1/1/2022 | 10.2 % of GDP |
2/1/2022 | 9.7 % of GDP |
3/1/2022 | 9.8 % of GDP |
4/1/2022 | 8.3 % of GDP |
5/1/2022 | 9.4 % of GDP |
6/1/2022 | 8.1 % of GDP |
7/1/2022 | 9.1 % of GDP |
8/1/2022 | 8.9 % of GDP |
9/1/2022 | 8.1 % of GDP |
10/1/2022 | 8.5 % of GDP |
11/1/2022 | 8.5 % of GDP |
12/1/2022 | 7.8 % of GDP |
1/1/2023 | 7.2 % of GDP |
2/1/2023 | 7.4 % of GDP |
3/1/2023 | 7.9 % of GDP |
4/1/2023 | 8.3 % of GDP |
5/1/2023 | 8.2 % of GDP |
6/1/2023 | 8.4 % of GDP |
7/1/2023 | 8.9 % of GDP |
8/1/2023 | 9.1 % of GDP |
9/1/2023 | 9.1 % of GDP |
10/1/2023 | 9 % of GDP |
11/1/2023 | 9 % of GDP |
12/1/2023 | 8 % of GDP |
1/1/2024 | 6.6 % of GDP |
2/1/2024 | 6.8 % of GDP |
3/1/2024 | 7 % of GDP |
National Wealth Fund Assets to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) History
Date | Value |
---|---|
3/1/2024 | 7 % of GDP |
2/1/2024 | 6.8 % of GDP |
1/1/2024 | 6.6 % of GDP |
12/1/2023 | 8 % of GDP |
11/1/2023 | 9 % of GDP |
10/1/2023 | 9 % of GDP |
9/1/2023 | 9.1 % of GDP |
8/1/2023 | 9.1 % of GDP |
7/1/2023 | 8.9 % of GDP |
6/1/2023 | 8.4 % of GDP |
Similar Macro Indicators to National Wealth Fund Assets to Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
Name | Current | Previous | Frequency |
---|---|---|---|
🇷🇺 Assets of the National Wealth Fund | 141.5 B USD | 138.9 B USD | Monthly |
🇷🇺 Corruption Index | 26 Points | 28 Points | Annually |
🇷🇺 Corruption Rank | 141 | 137 | Annually |
🇷🇺 Fiscal Expenditure | 9.326 T RUB | 6.499 T RUB | Monthly |
🇷🇺 Government budget | -1.9 % of GDP | -2.3 % of GDP | Annually |
🇷🇺 Government Debt to GDP Ratio | 14.9 % of GDP | 16 % of GDP | Annually |
🇷🇺 Government Spending | 6.499 T RUB | 6.428 T RUB | Quarter |
🇷🇺 Military expenditures | 109.454 B USD | 102.367 B USD | Annually |
🇷🇺 National Wealth Fund Liquidity | 4.603 T RUB | 5.046 T RUB | Monthly |
🇷🇺 Public debt | 20.587 T RUB | 20.565 T RUB | Monthly |
🇷🇺 Public revenue | 26.289 B RUB | 23.029 B RUB | Monthly |
🇷🇺 Value of the State Budget | -983 B RUB | -1.48 T RUB | Monthly |
The National Wealth Fund Assets to GDP ratio indicates the proportion of the Russian National Wealth Fund (NWF) holdings relative to the country's GDP. The Russian National Wealth Fund is a sovereign wealth fund established from oil and gas revenues, as well as investment income, with the objective of ensuring the federal budget's stability during periods of economic uncertainty.
Macro pages for other countries in Europe
- 🇦🇱Albania
- 🇦🇹Austria
- 🇧🇾Belarus
- 🇧🇪Belgium
- 🇧🇦Bosnia and Herzegovina
- 🇧🇬Bulgaria
- 🇭🇷Croatia
- 🇨🇾Cyprus
- 🇨🇿Czech Republic
- 🇩🇰Denmark
- 🇪🇪Estonia
- 🇫🇴Faroe Islands
- 🇫🇮Finland
- 🇫🇷France
- 🇩🇪Germany
- 🇬🇷Greece
- 🇭🇺Hungary
- 🇮🇸Island
- 🇮🇪Ireland
- 🇮🇹Italy
- 🇽🇰Kosovo
- 🇱🇻Latvia
- 🇱🇮Liechtenstein
- 🇱🇹Lithuania
- 🇱🇺Luxembourg
- 🇲🇰North Macedonia
- 🇲🇹Malta
- 🇲🇩Moldova
- 🇲🇨Monaco
- 🇲🇪Montenegro
- 🇳🇱Netherlands
- 🇳🇴Norway
- 🇵🇱Poland
- 🇵🇹Portugal
- 🇷🇴Romania
- 🇷🇸Serbia
- 🇸🇰Slovakia
- 🇸🇮Slovenia
- 🇪🇸Spain
- 🇸🇪Sweden
- 🇨🇭Switzerland
- 🇺🇦Ukraine
- 🇬🇧United Kingdom
- 🇦🇩Andorra
What is National Wealth Fund Assets to Gross Domestic Product (GDP)?
At Eulerpool, a leading platform for displaying intricate macroeconomic data, we delve deep into the critical indicators that shape national economies. One such vital metric is the 'National Wealth Fund Assets to GDP' ratio. This parameter underscores the financial health and strategic reserve capacity of a nation, offering insights into economic stability, sovereign risk, and potential fiscal leeway. In this comprehensive exploration, we will articulate the significance, methodology, global perspectives, and implications of the National Wealth Fund Assets to GDP ratio, providing a robust understanding for policymakers, economists, and investors alike. To lay the groundwork, let us begin with a clear definition of what constitutes a National Wealth Fund. Typically known as Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWF), these funds are state-owned investment vehicles created to manage the national wealth for various objectives including stabilizing the economy, promoting long-term national growth, and saving for future generations. These funds are usually derived from revenue surpluses, natural resource exports, trade surpluses, or privatization proceeds. The assets of these funds can be invested in a wide range of financial and real assets to ensure optimal growth and risk management. The National Wealth Fund Assets to GDP is a ratio that compares the total assets of a country's wealth fund(s) to its Gross Domestic Product (GDP). This ratio provides a snapshot of a nation's accumulated reserves relative to the size of its economy. A higher ratio indicates substantial reserves in proportion to the economic output, suggesting stronger economic resilience and a buffer against fiscal shocks. Conversely, a lower ratio may reflect lesser financial reserve strength relative to the country's economic size, potentially signaling vulnerability to economic disruptions. Understanding the methodology behind the calculation of this ratio is crucial. The numerator, National Wealth Fund Assets, encompasses the total financial value of all assets held within the country's sovereign wealth funds. These assets can include—but are not limited to—stocks, bonds, real estate, precious metals, foreign exchange reserves, and other financial instruments. The denominator, GDP, is the aggregate value of all goods and services produced in the country within a given year. By dividing the total assets of the wealth fund by the nation's GDP, we obtain a dimensionless ratio that allows for comparative analysis across different countries and time periods. Let's explore the significance of this ratio in greater detail. Primarily, the National Wealth Fund Assets to GDP ratio is an indicator of a nation's financial cushion. In periods of economic downturns or fiscal crises, countries with higher ratios possess a substantial buffer to absorb shocks, potentially mitigating the adverse impact on the economy. Moreover, these reserves can be tapped to finance fiscal stimulus, bailouts, or expansive monetary policies without necessitating excessive borrowings, thereby maintaining fiscal sustainability. Investors closely monitor this ratio as a proxy for sovereign creditworthiness. A robust National Wealth Fund signifies prudent fiscal management and can lead to higher credit ratings from agencies like Moody’s, S&P, and Fitch. Consequently, countries with higher ratios often enjoy lower borrowing costs, as the risk premium on their debt is reduced. This can create a virtuous cycle, where the savings on interest payments allow for reinvestment into the economy, fostering growth and further bolstering the wealth fund. Comparatively, this ratio also informs the strategic financial planning and international competitiveness of nations. For resource-rich countries like Norway and the Gulf States, a high National Wealth Fund Assets to GDP ratio underscores the effective channeling of resource revenues into sustainable, diversified investment portfolios. This foresight is critical in the long term as it cushions the impact when natural resource reserves deplete or when commodity prices are volatile. In contrast, countries with lower ratios may need to adopt more innovative fiscal strategies or structural reforms to ensure economic resilience. Assessing a global perspective offers intriguing insights into economic strategies and their outcomes. For example, Norway's Government Pension Fund Global, often hailed as a paragon of sovereign wealth funds, represents assets well beyond its GDP, indicative of prudent financial stewardship and long-term planning. On the other end of the spectrum, some developing countries with burgeoning GDPs but limited wealth fund reserves may exhibit lower ratios, reflecting either nascent stages of fund establishment or other strategic priorities in national fiscal management. It is critical to recognize that the National Wealth Fund Assets to GDP ratio is influenced by multiple factors, including resource endowments, fiscal policies, and geopolitical stability. The composition of the wealth fund's investments also plays a significant role. A diversified portfolio, adept at navigating market cycles, can enhance the asset base and thus positively impact the ratio. Moreover, geopolitical stability ensures that the nation's wealth fund is less likely to face abrupt depletion due to external conflicts or internal political turmoil. Ultimately, the implications of this ratio on a macroeconomic scale extend beyond the sphere of finance. Higher ratios can engender greater public confidence in national economic management, potentially translating into social stability and sustainable development. Policymakers often leverage insights derived from this ratio to optimize economic policies, design fiscal buffers, and craft long-term visions for national prosperity. In summary, Eulerpool's deep dive into the 'National Wealth Fund Assets to GDP' underscores its paramount importance as a barometer of fiscal health and economic preparedness. By illuminating the intricacies of this ratio, we aim to empower stakeholders with the acumen to interpret, strategize, and catalyze economic resilience and prosperity. As we continue to navigate an increasingly complex and interconnected global economy, such macroeconomic indicators remain crucial in shaping informed and proactive economic stewardship.