Access the world's leading financial data and tools
Subscribe for $2 Peru Remittances
Price
The current value of the Remittances in Peru is 1.193 B USD. The Remittances in Peru decreased to 1.193 B USD on 3/1/2024, after it was 1.207 B USD on 12/1/2023. From 3/1/1990 to 6/1/2024, the average GDP in Peru was 467.11 M USD. The all-time high was reached on 12/1/2023 with 1.21 B USD, while the lowest value was recorded on 3/1/1990 with 21.75 M USD.
Remittances ·
3 years
5 years
10 years
25 Years
Max
Transfers | |
---|---|
3/1/1990 | 21.75 M USD |
6/1/1990 | 21.75 M USD |
9/1/1990 | 21.75 M USD |
12/1/1990 | 21.75 M USD |
3/1/1991 | 37.25 M USD |
6/1/1991 | 37.25 M USD |
9/1/1991 | 37.25 M USD |
12/1/1991 | 37.25 M USD |
3/1/1992 | 59.5 M USD |
6/1/1992 | 59.5 M USD |
9/1/1992 | 59.5 M USD |
12/1/1992 | 59.5 M USD |
3/1/1993 | 72.25 M USD |
6/1/1993 | 72.25 M USD |
9/1/1993 | 72.25 M USD |
12/1/1993 | 72.25 M USD |
3/1/1994 | 118.25 M USD |
6/1/1994 | 118.25 M USD |
9/1/1994 | 118.25 M USD |
12/1/1994 | 118.25 M USD |
3/1/1995 | 149.75 M USD |
6/1/1995 | 149.75 M USD |
9/1/1995 | 149.75 M USD |
12/1/1995 | 149.75 M USD |
3/1/1996 | 149.25 M USD |
6/1/1996 | 149.25 M USD |
9/1/1996 | 149.25 M USD |
12/1/1996 | 149.25 M USD |
3/1/1997 | 159 M USD |
6/1/1997 | 159 M USD |
9/1/1997 | 159 M USD |
12/1/1997 | 159 M USD |
3/1/1998 | 161.75 M USD |
6/1/1998 | 161.75 M USD |
9/1/1998 | 161.75 M USD |
12/1/1998 | 161.75 M USD |
3/1/1999 | 167.5 M USD |
6/1/1999 | 167.5 M USD |
9/1/1999 | 167.5 M USD |
12/1/1999 | 167.5 M USD |
3/1/2000 | 179.92 M USD |
6/1/2000 | 178.92 M USD |
9/1/2000 | 179.92 M USD |
12/1/2000 | 178.92 M USD |
3/1/2001 | 169.47 M USD |
6/1/2001 | 178.89 M USD |
9/1/2001 | 178.89 M USD |
12/1/2001 | 225.96 M USD |
3/1/2002 | 158.71 M USD |
6/1/2002 | 167.53 M USD |
9/1/2002 | 167.53 M USD |
12/1/2002 | 211.61 M USD |
3/1/2003 | 181 M USD |
6/1/2003 | 205.48 M USD |
9/1/2003 | 220.02 M USD |
12/1/2003 | 262 M USD |
3/1/2004 | 238.13 M USD |
6/1/2004 | 268.8 M USD |
9/1/2004 | 287.88 M USD |
12/1/2004 | 337.9 M USD |
3/1/2005 | 308.14 M USD |
6/1/2005 | 351.75 M USD |
9/1/2005 | 367.37 M USD |
12/1/2005 | 412.81 M USD |
3/1/2006 | 389.02 M USD |
6/1/2006 | 444.67 M USD |
9/1/2006 | 470.93 M USD |
12/1/2006 | 532.88 M USD |
3/1/2007 | 475.94 M USD |
6/1/2007 | 508.74 M USD |
9/1/2007 | 542.45 M USD |
12/1/2007 | 603.68 M USD |
3/1/2008 | 571.08 M USD |
6/1/2008 | 616.3 M USD |
9/1/2008 | 630.7 M USD |
12/1/2008 | 625.56 M USD |
3/1/2009 | 547.49 M USD |
6/1/2009 | 581.05 M USD |
9/1/2009 | 615.44 M USD |
12/1/2009 | 664.72 M USD |
3/1/2010 | 587.55 M USD |
6/1/2010 | 609.31 M USD |
9/1/2010 | 636.17 M USD |
12/1/2010 | 700.89 M USD |
3/1/2011 | 633.63 M USD |
6/1/2011 | 675.15 M USD |
9/1/2011 | 680.1 M USD |
12/1/2011 | 708.08 M USD |
3/1/2012 | 677.54 M USD |
6/1/2012 | 689.65 M USD |
9/1/2012 | 703.94 M USD |
12/1/2012 | 716.82 M USD |
3/1/2013 | 636.81 M USD |
6/1/2013 | 687.13 M USD |
9/1/2013 | 675 M USD |
12/1/2013 | 708.31 M USD |
3/1/2014 | 632.75 M USD |
6/1/2014 | 662.97 M USD |
9/1/2014 | 663.58 M USD |
12/1/2014 | 677.25 M USD |
3/1/2015 | 627.7 M USD |
6/1/2015 | 667.01 M USD |
9/1/2015 | 714.53 M USD |
12/1/2015 | 715.81 M USD |
3/1/2016 | 671.7 M USD |
6/1/2016 | 720.61 M USD |
9/1/2016 | 744.61 M USD |
12/1/2016 | 746.98 M USD |
3/1/2017 | 709.82 M USD |
6/1/2017 | 766.18 M USD |
9/1/2017 | 783.93 M USD |
12/1/2017 | 791.3 M USD |
3/1/2018 | 773.92 M USD |
6/1/2018 | 810.65 M USD |
9/1/2018 | 809.31 M USD |
12/1/2018 | 830.87 M USD |
3/1/2019 | 794.24 M USD |
6/1/2019 | 841.13 M USD |
9/1/2019 | 839.17 M USD |
12/1/2019 | 851.38 M USD |
3/1/2020 | 669.25 M USD |
6/1/2020 | 561.36 M USD |
9/1/2020 | 803.96 M USD |
12/1/2020 | 869.47 M USD |
3/1/2021 | 855.01 M USD |
6/1/2021 | 922.81 M USD |
9/1/2021 | 879.84 M USD |
12/1/2021 | 949.97 M USD |
3/1/2022 | 896.88 M USD |
6/1/2022 | 917.53 M USD |
9/1/2022 | 905.92 M USD |
12/1/2022 | 987.23 M USD |
3/1/2023 | 994.67 M USD |
6/1/2023 | 1.09 B USD |
9/1/2023 | 1.15 B USD |
12/1/2023 | 1.21 B USD |
3/1/2024 | 1.19 B USD |
Remittances History
Date | Value |
---|---|
3/1/2024 | 1.193 B USD |
12/1/2023 | 1.207 B USD |
9/1/2023 | 1.151 B USD |
6/1/2023 | 1.094 B USD |
3/1/2023 | 994.67 M USD |
12/1/2022 | 987.229 M USD |
9/1/2022 | 905.923 M USD |
6/1/2022 | 917.529 M USD |
3/1/2022 | 896.876 M USD |
12/1/2021 | 949.966 M USD |
Similar Macro Indicators to Remittances
Name | Current | Previous | Frequency |
---|---|---|---|
🇵🇪 Crude Oil Production | 39 BBL/D/1K | 41 BBL/D/1K | Monthly |
🇵🇪 Current Account | 678.8 M USD | 1.936 B USD | Quarter |
🇵🇪 Current Account to GDP | 0.6 % of GDP | -4 % of GDP | Annually |
🇵🇪 Exports | 4.981 B USD | 5.597 B USD | Monthly |
🇵🇪 Foreign debt | 105.696 B USD | 102.754 B USD | Quarter |
🇵🇪 Foreign Debt to GDP | 17.6 % of GDP | 12.9 % of GDP | Annually |
🇵🇪 Foreign Direct Investments | 30.206 M USD | 1.348 B USD | Quarter |
🇵🇪 Gold reserves | 34.67 Tonnes | 34.67 Tonnes | Quarter |
🇵🇪 Imports | 4.331 B USD | 4.098 B USD | Monthly |
🇵🇪 Terrorism Index | 2.045 Points | 3.856 Points | Annually |
🇵🇪 Tourist arrivals | 2.009 M | 444,331 | Annually |
🇵🇪 Trade Balance | 650 M USD | 1.499 B USD | Monthly |
🇵🇪 Trading Conditions | 113.4 points | 110.3 points | Monthly |
In Peru, Remittances refer to the inflows of income transfers from migrants and short-term employees (personal remittances).
Macro pages for other countries in America
- 🇦🇷Argentina
- 🇦🇼Aruba
- 🇧🇸Bahamas
- 🇧🇧Barbados
- 🇧🇿Belize
- 🇧🇲Bermuda
- 🇧🇴Bolivia
- 🇧🇷Brazil
- 🇨🇦Canada
- 🇰🇾Cayman Islands
- 🇨🇱Chile
- 🇨🇴Colombia
- 🇨🇷Costa Rica
- 🇨🇺Cuba
- 🇩🇴Dominican Republic
- 🇪🇨Ecuador
- 🇸🇻El Salvador
- 🇬🇹Guatemala
- 🇬🇾Guyana
- 🇭🇹Haiti
- 🇭🇳Honduras
- 🇯🇲Jamaica
- 🇲🇽Mexico
- 🇳🇮Nicaragua
- 🇵🇦Panama
- 🇵🇾Paraguay
- 🇵🇷Puerto Rico
- 🇸🇷Suriname
- 🇹🇹Trinidad and Tobago
- 🇺🇸United States
- 🇺🇾Uruguay
- 🇻🇪Venezuela
- 🇦🇬Antigua and Barbuda
- 🇩🇲Dominica
- 🇬🇩Grenada
What is Remittances?
Remittances are a pivotal aspect of the global economy, playing a crucial role in the financial sustenance of numerous developing countries. They represent the transfer of money or goods by foreign workers to their home countries. In the sphere of macroeconomics, remittances are often analyzed for their impact on both the sending and receiving nations' economies. At Eulerpool, our objective is to provide comprehensive and accurate macroeconomic data, and understanding the nuances of remittances is integral to this mission. Fundamentally, remittances are financial or in-kind transfers made by migrants to family members or communities back in their homeland. This cross-border flow of funds has significant implications for economic stability, development, and poverty alleviation in recipient countries. For many families, remittances are a critical source of income, enabling them to afford basic necessities such as food, healthcare, and education. Consequently, these transfers play a direct role in improving the living standards and economic resilience of recipients. The magnitude of remittance flows is substantial. According to the World Bank, remittances to low- and middle-income countries reached a record high of $540 billion in 2022, surpassing foreign direct investment (FDI) and official development assistance (ODA). This trend underscores the growing importance of remittances as a stable and reliable source of external financing for developing economies. The consistency and predictability of remittances make them particularly valuable during periods of economic downturn or political instability, when other forms of financial inflows might dwindle. From a macroeconomic perspective, remittances have multifaceted impacts on the economies of receiving countries. Firstly, they contribute to higher aggregate demand. The additional income received by households is typically spent on consumption, leading to increased demand for goods and services. This, in turn, can stimulate local businesses, enhance production capabilities, and potentially create employment opportunities, thereby fostering economic growth. Secondly, remittances can bolster financial system stability. Increased remittance inflows often lead to higher levels of savings and investments within recipient countries. Many recipients deposit a portion of their remittances into local banks, which can enhance the liquidity of the banking sector and promote financial inclusion. Enhanced liquidity can empower banks to extend more credit to businesses and individuals, further stimulating economic activity. Moreover, remittances can positively affect the balance of payments of recipient countries. They represent a significant source of foreign exchange earnings, which can help to address current account deficits and stabilize exchange rates. A steady stream of remittance inflows can mitigate the impact of external shocks, reduce the risk of currency devaluation, and enhance the overall economic resilience of a nation. However, the macroeconomic effects of remittances are not exclusively positive. There are potential downsides and risks associated with heavy reliance on these funds. One concern is the potential for "Dutch disease" effects. Large inflows of remittances can lead to an appreciation of the recipient country's currency. While a stronger currency might seem beneficial, it can make exports more expensive and less competitive, potentially harming industries reliant on international markets. This phenomenon can skew economic structures and lead to an overreliance on remittances rather than promoting sustainable, diversified economic growth. Additionally, remittance dependence might discourage labor force participation and productivity. If households become reliant on remittances as a primary income source, there could be reduced incentives for local employment and entrepreneurial activities. This dependency could hinder long-term economic development by discouraging domestic labor market participation and innovation. In sending countries, the outflow of remittances can have distinct economic implications. Migrants often remit a significant portion of their earnings, which means that a substantial amount of income generated abroad does not contribute to the economy of the host country. While this may not severely impact robust economies, smaller economies with high migrant populations may experience a reduction in domestic savings, investment, and consumption levels, which could potentially constrain economic growth. Despite these concerns, the broader consensus is that the advantages of remittances outweigh the potential drawbacks, especially for developing countries. Governments and policymakers have a crucial role in maximizing the benefits of remittances while mitigating associated risks. Proactive measures, such as financial literacy programs, investment incentives, and development of efficient remittance transfer systems, can optimize the positive impacts of remittances on recipient economies. Technological advancements have also played a significant role in transforming remittance flows. The proliferation of digital payment platforms and mobile banking has made remittance transfers faster, cheaper, and more accessible. These technologies have significantly reduced transaction costs and improved financial inclusion, especially in remote and underserved areas. Digital innovations continue to shape the future of remittance flows, offering new opportunities for both senders and recipients. In conclusion, remittances are a vital element of the global financial landscape, with profound implications for both sending and receiving countries. At Eulerpool, we recognize the importance of remittances in macroeconomic analysis and strive to provide accurate, detailed data to inform policy and decision-making. By understanding the complex dynamics of remittance flows, we can better appreciate their role in fostering economic stability, growth, and development on a global scale.