Access the world's leading financial data and tools
Subscribe for $2 Norway Asylum Applications
Price
The current value of the Asylum Applications in Norway is 320 persons. The Asylum Applications in Norway decreased to 320 persons on 4/1/2024, after it was 320 persons on 3/1/2024. From 1/1/2008 to 5/1/2024, the average GDP in Norway was 690.56 persons. The all-time high was reached on 10/1/2015 with 8,570 persons, while the lowest value was recorded on 4/1/2020 with 30 persons.
Asylum Applications ·
3 years
5 years
10 years
25 Years
Max
Asylum applications | |
---|---|
1/1/2008 | 830 persons |
2/1/2008 | 755 persons |
3/1/2008 | 805 persons |
4/1/2008 | 815 persons |
5/1/2008 | 955 persons |
6/1/2008 | 1,040 persons |
7/1/2008 | 1,400 persons |
8/1/2008 | 1,655 persons |
9/1/2008 | 1,510 persons |
10/1/2008 | 1,425 persons |
11/1/2008 | 1,405 persons |
12/1/2008 | 1,425 persons |
1/1/2009 | 1,295 persons |
2/1/2009 | 1,145 persons |
3/1/2009 | 1,225 persons |
4/1/2009 | 1,235 persons |
5/1/2009 | 1,455 persons |
6/1/2009 | 1,500 persons |
7/1/2009 | 1,715 persons |
8/1/2009 | 1,745 persons |
9/1/2009 | 1,565 persons |
10/1/2009 | 1,435 persons |
11/1/2009 | 1,140 persons |
12/1/2009 | 1,025 persons |
1/1/2010 | 810 persons |
2/1/2010 | 690 persons |
3/1/2010 | 870 persons |
4/1/2010 | 530 persons |
5/1/2010 | 620 persons |
6/1/2010 | 670 persons |
7/1/2010 | 830 persons |
8/1/2010 | 940 persons |
9/1/2010 | 875 persons |
10/1/2010 | 895 persons |
11/1/2010 | 800 persons |
12/1/2010 | 740 persons |
1/1/2011 | 765 persons |
2/1/2011 | 600 persons |
3/1/2011 | 635 persons |
4/1/2011 | 625 persons |
5/1/2011 | 810 persons |
6/1/2011 | 775 persons |
7/1/2011 | 685 persons |
8/1/2011 | 785 persons |
9/1/2011 | 810 persons |
10/1/2011 | 735 persons |
11/1/2011 | 630 persons |
12/1/2011 | 665 persons |
1/1/2012 | 720 persons |
2/1/2012 | 605 persons |
3/1/2012 | 605 persons |
4/1/2012 | 630 persons |
5/1/2012 | 635 persons |
6/1/2012 | 775 persons |
7/1/2012 | 830 persons |
8/1/2012 | 905 persons |
9/1/2012 | 890 persons |
10/1/2012 | 955 persons |
11/1/2012 | 825 persons |
12/1/2012 | 840 persons |
1/1/2013 | 935 persons |
2/1/2013 | 645 persons |
3/1/2013 | 810 persons |
4/1/2013 | 760 persons |
5/1/2013 | 730 persons |
6/1/2013 | 885 persons |
7/1/2013 | 1,225 persons |
8/1/2013 | 1,560 persons |
9/1/2013 | 1,330 persons |
10/1/2013 | 1,035 persons |
11/1/2013 | 805 persons |
12/1/2013 | 715 persons |
1/1/2014 | 690 persons |
2/1/2014 | 545 persons |
3/1/2014 | 650 persons |
4/1/2014 | 775 persons |
5/1/2014 | 1,225 persons |
6/1/2014 | 1,150 persons |
7/1/2014 | 970 persons |
8/1/2014 | 1,065 persons |
9/1/2014 | 1,270 persons |
10/1/2014 | 1,010 persons |
11/1/2014 | 825 persons |
12/1/2014 | 730 persons |
1/1/2015 | 560 persons |
2/1/2015 | 480 persons |
3/1/2015 | 480 persons |
4/1/2015 | 520 persons |
5/1/2015 | 1,160 persons |
6/1/2015 | 1,075 persons |
7/1/2015 | 1,335 persons |
8/1/2015 | 2,285 persons |
9/1/2015 | 4,885 persons |
10/1/2015 | 8,570 persons |
11/1/2015 | 8,105 persons |
12/1/2015 | 1,005 persons |
1/1/2016 | 380 persons |
2/1/2016 | 235 persons |
3/1/2016 | 270 persons |
4/1/2016 | 225 persons |
5/1/2016 | 195 persons |
6/1/2016 | 245 persons |
7/1/2016 | 255 persons |
8/1/2016 | 290 persons |
9/1/2016 | 260 persons |
10/1/2016 | 255 persons |
11/1/2016 | 225 persons |
12/1/2016 | 410 persons |
1/1/2017 | 465 persons |
2/1/2017 | 305 persons |
3/1/2017 | 395 persons |
4/1/2017 | 340 persons |
5/1/2017 | 405 persons |
6/1/2017 | 340 persons |
7/1/2017 | 255 persons |
8/1/2017 | 230 persons |
9/1/2017 | 165 persons |
10/1/2017 | 165 persons |
11/1/2017 | 130 persons |
12/1/2017 | 150 persons |
1/1/2018 | 150 persons |
2/1/2018 | 140 persons |
3/1/2018 | 140 persons |
4/1/2018 | 170 persons |
5/1/2018 | 170 persons |
6/1/2018 | 290 persons |
7/1/2018 | 385 persons |
8/1/2018 | 280 persons |
9/1/2018 | 255 persons |
10/1/2018 | 230 persons |
11/1/2018 | 160 persons |
12/1/2018 | 160 persons |
1/1/2019 | 175 persons |
2/1/2019 | 150 persons |
3/1/2019 | 150 persons |
4/1/2019 | 155 persons |
5/1/2019 | 120 persons |
6/1/2019 | 175 persons |
7/1/2019 | 175 persons |
8/1/2019 | 230 persons |
9/1/2019 | 235 persons |
10/1/2019 | 240 persons |
11/1/2019 | 200 persons |
12/1/2019 | 160 persons |
1/1/2020 | 215 persons |
2/1/2020 | 165 persons |
3/1/2020 | 95 persons |
4/1/2020 | 30 persons |
5/1/2020 | 30 persons |
6/1/2020 | 60 persons |
7/1/2020 | 130 persons |
8/1/2020 | 200 persons |
9/1/2020 | 130 persons |
10/1/2020 | 130 persons |
11/1/2020 | 70 persons |
12/1/2020 | 65 persons |
1/1/2021 | 40 persons |
2/1/2021 | 40 persons |
3/1/2021 | 95 persons |
4/1/2021 | 70 persons |
5/1/2021 | 70 persons |
6/1/2021 | 105 persons |
7/1/2021 | 160 persons |
8/1/2021 | 185 persons |
9/1/2021 | 300 persons |
10/1/2021 | 150 persons |
11/1/2021 | 235 persons |
12/1/2021 | 145 persons |
1/1/2022 | 145 persons |
2/1/2022 | 175 persons |
3/1/2022 | 350 persons |
4/1/2022 | 215 persons |
5/1/2022 | 315 persons |
6/1/2022 | 300 persons |
7/1/2022 | 305 persons |
8/1/2022 | 540 persons |
9/1/2022 | 635 persons |
10/1/2022 | 715 persons |
11/1/2022 | 565 persons |
12/1/2022 | 385 persons |
1/1/2023 | 375 persons |
2/1/2023 | 265 persons |
3/1/2023 | 325 persons |
4/1/2023 | 290 persons |
5/1/2023 | 340 persons |
6/1/2023 | 410 persons |
7/1/2023 | 545 persons |
8/1/2023 | 580 persons |
9/1/2023 | 635 persons |
10/1/2023 | 565 persons |
11/1/2023 | 480 persons |
12/1/2023 | 420 persons |
1/1/2024 | 355 persons |
2/1/2024 | 335 persons |
3/1/2024 | 320 persons |
4/1/2024 | 320 persons |
Asylum Applications History
Date | Value |
---|---|
4/1/2024 | 320 persons |
3/1/2024 | 320 persons |
2/1/2024 | 335 persons |
1/1/2024 | 355 persons |
12/1/2023 | 420 persons |
11/1/2023 | 480 persons |
10/1/2023 | 565 persons |
9/1/2023 | 635 persons |
8/1/2023 | 580 persons |
7/1/2023 | 545 persons |
Similar Macro Indicators to Asylum Applications
Name | Current | Previous | Frequency |
---|---|---|---|
🇳🇴 Corruption Index | 84 Points | 84 Points | Annually |
🇳🇴 Corruption Rank | 4 | 4 | Annually |
🇳🇴 Fiscal Expenditure | 512.813 B NOK | 457.634 B NOK | Quarter |
🇳🇴 Government budget | 16.3 % of GDP | 25.6 % of GDP | Annually |
🇳🇴 Government Debt to GDP Ratio | 44.3 % of GDP | 36.5 % of GDP | Annually |
🇳🇴 Government Spending | 258.801 B NOK | 257.409 B NOK | Quarter |
🇳🇴 Government Spending to GDP | 46.4 % of GDP | 38.3 % of GDP | Annually |
🇳🇴 Military expenditures | 8.669 B USD | 8.698 B USD | Annually |
🇳🇴 Public debt | 708.529 B NOK | 796.757 B NOK | Quarter |
🇳🇴 Public revenue | 566.575 B NOK | 637.274 B NOK | Quarter |
🇳🇴 Value of the State Budget | 53.762 B NOK | 179.64 B NOK | Quarter |
Asylum Application in this context refers to first-time applicants. Data is provided to Eulerpool by Eurostat, national ministries of interior, and other official agencies.
Macro pages for other countries in Europe
- 🇦🇱Albania
- 🇦🇹Austria
- 🇧🇾Belarus
- 🇧🇪Belgium
- 🇧🇦Bosnia and Herzegovina
- 🇧🇬Bulgaria
- 🇭🇷Croatia
- 🇨🇾Cyprus
- 🇨🇿Czech Republic
- 🇩🇰Denmark
- 🇪🇪Estonia
- 🇫🇴Faroe Islands
- 🇫🇮Finland
- 🇫🇷France
- 🇩🇪Germany
- 🇬🇷Greece
- 🇭🇺Hungary
- 🇮🇸Island
- 🇮🇪Ireland
- 🇮🇹Italy
- 🇽🇰Kosovo
- 🇱🇻Latvia
- 🇱🇮Liechtenstein
- 🇱🇹Lithuania
- 🇱🇺Luxembourg
- 🇲🇰North Macedonia
- 🇲🇹Malta
- 🇲🇩Moldova
- 🇲🇨Monaco
- 🇲🇪Montenegro
- 🇳🇱Netherlands
- 🇵🇱Poland
- 🇵🇹Portugal
- 🇷🇴Romania
- 🇷🇺Russia
- 🇷🇸Serbia
- 🇸🇰Slovakia
- 🇸🇮Slovenia
- 🇪🇸Spain
- 🇸🇪Sweden
- 🇨🇭Switzerland
- 🇺🇦Ukraine
- 🇬🇧United Kingdom
- 🇦🇩Andorra
What is Asylum Applications?
Asylum Applications: A Comprehensive Examination | Eulerpool Asylum Applications represent a critical metric within the domain of macroeconomic data analysis. At Eulerpool, we strive to provide invaluable insights into the multifaceted world of macroeconomic indicators, and our focus on Asylum Applications serves to shed light on significant socio-economic dynamics that influence global economies. This in-depth examination explores the relevance, implications, and interpretations of Asylum Applications as a macroeconomic indicator. The term "Asylum Applications" refers to the formal requests made by individuals seeking refuge in a foreign country due to crises such as persecution, conflict, or severe instability in their home country. Asylum seekers often flee dire situations that threaten their safety and well-being, motivated by the pursuit of protection and better opportunities. Understanding the trends and implications of asylum applications provides a nuanced perspective on global economic, social, and political climates. Analyzing the volume and patterns of asylum applications is essential for several reasons. Firstly, the statistics on asylum applications offer indispensable data for governmental policy formulation and humanitarian efforts. High volumes of asylum seekers can signal significant geopolitical disruptions, prompting an urgent need for international cooperation and aid. Secondly, countries receiving large numbers of asylum applications must adjust their economic and social policies to accommodate incoming populations, impacting housing, employment, healthcare, and social services. Countries across Europe, North America, and other parts of the world frequently deal with varying volumes of asylum seekers. For instance, during times of heightened conflict in particular regions, such as the Syrian Civil War or the crisis in Afghanistan, there can be notable surges in asylum applications to Europe and other Western nations. The data trends reflecting these movements are instrumental in understanding the pressures faced by host countries and the corresponding economic implications. From a macroeconomic perspective, Asylum Applications are a telling indicator of broader economic conditions. In times of global economic instability or regional economic downturns, increases in asylum applications often underscore the hardships endured by populations under duress. Conversely, during periods of relative stability or economic growth, the rate of asylum applications might stabilize or even decline, reflecting improved conditions in the regions of origin. Furthermore, the processing and integration of asylum seekers present both challenges and opportunities for host nations. On one hand, accommodating a significant influx of asylum seekers can strain public resources, necessitate fiscal adjustments, and provoke societal tensions. On the other hand, successfully integrating asylum seekers into the economy can lead to diversified workforces, cultural enrichment, and longer-term economic benefits. Labor market participation by asylum seekers can alleviate skill shortages in certain sectors and contribute to economic productivity. Eulerpool’s platform enables detailed analysis of asylum application data, providing users with historical and up-to-date statistics that can be dissected by country of origin, destination country, time period, and other relevant factors. By leveraging this data, researchers, policymakers, and economists can forecast trends, assess the need for humanitarian assistance, and propose optimal policy responses. Our sophisticated tools allow for the visualization of trends, facilitating a clear understanding of the implications of this critical macroeconomic variable. A deeper exploration of asylum applications also involves examining the socio-political context. As political instability, violence, and persecution drive refugees to seek asylum in foreign lands, the sociopolitical backdrop of these migrations becomes crucial. Comprehensive analysis entails looking at the root causes of displacement, such as ethnic conflicts, political repression, human rights abuses, and environmental disasters. Understanding these root causes provides essential context and underscores the interconnectedness of social, political, and economic factors influencing global asylum patterns. Moreover, Asylum Applications data can aid in the assessment of international relations. Agreements such as the Dublin Regulation in the European Union, which governs the handling of asylum seekers among member states, illustrate the complexity of asylum policies and the necessity for cooperative frameworks. Data on asylum applications helps to gauge the effectiveness of such agreements, revealing the distribution of asylum responsibilities and identifying areas for improvement in international refugee protection policies. From an economic performance standpoint, fluctuations in the number of asylum applications can serve as a barometer for regional stability and development. Countries experiencing high levels of outbound asylum applications may face significant socio-economic challenges, including inadequate governance, poor economic policies, or rampant insecurity, which can deter investments and impair economic growth. Thus, Asylum Applications data not only provides immediate insights into refugee movements but also offers indirect information about the economic health and governance quality of nations. In conclusion, Asylum Applications are a multifaceted indicator that plays a pivotal role in the analysis of macroeconomic conditions. By examining trends in asylum seekers, we can gain insights into global economic stability, socio-political dynamics, and the effectiveness of international policies. At Eulerpool, we are committed to presenting comprehensive, accurate, and actionable macroeconomic data. Our focus on asylum applications underscores our dedication to providing a holistic view of global economic phenomena, enabling users to make well-informed decisions grounded in robust data analysis.