Access the world's leading financial data and tools

Subscribe for $2
Analyse
Profile
🇲🇲

Myanmar Corruption Rank

Price

157
Change +/-
+17
Percentage Change
+11.45 %

The current value of the Corruption Rank in Myanmar is 157 . The Corruption Rank in Myanmar increased to 157 on 1/1/2022, after it was 140 on 1/1/2021. From 1/1/2003 to 1/1/2023, the average GDP in Myanmar was 153.95 . The all-time high was reached on 1/1/2011 with 180 , while the lowest value was recorded on 1/1/2003 with 129 .

Source: Transparency International

Corruption Rank

  • 3 years

  • 5 years

  • 10 years

  • 25 Years

  • Max

Corruption Rank

Corruption Rank History

DateValue
1/1/2022157
1/1/2021140
1/1/2020137
1/1/2019130
1/1/2018132
1/1/2017130
1/1/2016136
1/1/2015147
1/1/2014156
1/1/2013157
1
2

Similar Macro Indicators to Corruption Rank

NameCurrentPreviousFrequency
🇲🇲
Corruption Index
20 Points23 PointsAnnually
🇲🇲
Government budget
-5.2 % of GDP-7.8 % of GDPAnnually
🇲🇲
Government Debt to GDP Ratio
62.5 % of GDP62.3 % of GDPAnnually
🇲🇲
Military expenditures
2.494 B USD2.49 B USDAnnually

The Corruption Perceptions Index evaluates countries and territories by assessing the perceived level of corruption within their public sectors. The ranking of a country or territory signifies its relative standing compared to others in the index.

What is Corruption Rank?

Corruption Rank is one of the pivotal macroeconomic indicators that sheds light on the prevalence and impact of corrupt practices within a country. As a leading provider of macroeconomic data, Eulerpool places considerable emphasis on presenting an accurate and comprehensive overview of Corruption Rank, providing our users with valuable insights into its implications for economic stability, governance, and overall development. Understanding Corruption Rank is essential for investors, policy-makers, scholars, and anyone interested in the economic health and governance quality of a nation, as it profoundly influences business environments, socio-economic equity, and international relations. Corruption, broadly defined as the abuse of entrusted power for private gain, manifests in various forms, including bribery, embezzlement, nepotism, and fraud. The Corruption Rank essentially quantifies and ranks the degree of corruption perceived in different countries through comprehensive assessments and surveys conducted by reputable organizations like Transparency International and the World Bank. These assessments examine multiple dimensions of corruption, assessing both the public and private sectors, to provide a nuanced understanding of how corruption affects different aspects of societal and economic activities. The significance of the Corruption Rank lies in its ability to act as a barometer for the business environment within a country. Countries with higher levels of perceived corruption often face substantial challenges in attracting foreign investment, as investors are wary of the risks associated with corrupt practices. These risks include increased costs due to bribes and kickbacks, reduced operational efficiencies, and heightened exposure to legal and reputational risks. Transparency and accountability, or the lack thereof, thus play a critical role in shaping investors' decisions and perceptions. A higher Corruption Rank, indicating lower levels of corruption, is typically associated with stronger institutions, clearer regulations, and robust enforcement mechanisms. These factors create a more predictable and stable economic environment that fosters investor confidence and economic growth. Conversely, nations with lower Corruption Ranks often struggle with weak institutions, opaque legal frameworks, and inconsistent enforcement, which can deter investment and stymie economic progress. Governance quality is another crucial aspect influenced by the Corruption Rank. Good governance is characterized by transparency, accountability, and the rule of law, all of which are undermined by pervasive corruption. When corruption is rampant, public trust in governmental institutions erodes, leading to social discontent and potential unrest. This lack of trust can hinder the effective implementation of policies and reforms essential for sustainable development and poverty alleviation. Therefore, nations striving for long-term economic stability and development must prioritize anti-corruption measures and strengthen institutional frameworks to improve their Corruption Rank. Moreover, corruption has significant socio-economic repercussions that extend beyond the immediate financial impacts. It exacerbates income inequality, as those in power siphon resources away from critical public services such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure. This diversion of resources hampers social mobility and perpetuates cycles of poverty and inequality, creating a wider gap between the rich and the poor. By impeding fair competition and innovation, corruption also stifles entrepreneurial activities and diminishes the overall productivity of an economy. On the international stage, the Corruption Rank influences diplomatic relations and international aid. Donor agencies and multinational organizations often consider corruption levels when allocating aid and investment funds. Countries with lower Corruption Ranks are more likely to receive foreign aid and developmental assistance, as these resources are perceived to reach their intended beneficiaries more effectively. Conversely, high levels of corruption can lead to sanctions, reduced aid, and strained diplomatic relations, further isolating a country from the global community. Addressing corruption requires a multifaceted approach that includes legal reform, institutional strengthening, public awareness, and international cooperation. Anti-corruption laws and regulations must be robust, clear, and consistently enforced to create a deterrent effect. Strengthening institutions such as judiciary, law enforcement, and regulatory bodies is essential to ensure they operate independently and effectively without succumbing to corrupt influences. Public awareness campaigns and education initiatives can empower citizens to demand transparency and accountability from their leaders. International cooperation is also crucial in combating corruption, as corrupt activities often have cross-border dimensions. Collaboration between nations, international organizations, and private sector entities can facilitate the sharing of best practices, information, and resources to tackle corruption effectively. Global initiatives such as the United Nations Convention against Corruption and the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention underscore the importance of concerted efforts in the fight against corruption. Understanding and analyzing the Corruption Rank is a vital component of macroeconomic analysis, as it provides a window into the ethical and operational landscape within a country. At Eulerpool, we are committed to delivering high-quality and detailed macroeconomic data, including Corruption Rank, to help our users make informed decisions. By providing accurate data and insightful analysis, we aim to contribute to a deeper understanding of the interplay between corruption and economic development, fostering discourse and actions that promote transparency, good governance, and sustainable growth. In conclusion, Corruption Rank is a powerful indicator that encapsulates the extent of corruption within a country and its multifaceted impacts on economic, social, and political dimensions. It serves as a critical tool for investors, policymakers, scholars, and the general public to assess the health of a country's institutions and the quality of its governance. By highlighting the importance of transparency, accountability, and anti-corruption measures, Eulerpool endeavors to provide a comprehensive understanding of Corruption Rank and its far-reaching implications for global economic stability and development.