Access the world's leading financial data and tools
Subscribe for $2 Argentina Capacity Utilization
Price
The current value of the Capacity Utilization in Argentina is 59.7 %. The Capacity Utilization in Argentina increased to 59.7 % on 7/1/2024, after it was 54.5 % on 6/1/2024. From 1/1/2002 to 8/1/2024, the average GDP in Argentina was 68.07 %. The all-time high was reached on 11/1/2011 with 84.1 %, while the lowest value was recorded on 4/1/2020 with 42 %.
Capacity Utilization ·
3 years
5 years
10 years
25 Years
Max
Capacity Utilization | |
---|---|
1/1/2002 | 48.16 % |
2/1/2002 | 51.12 % |
3/1/2002 | 50.31 % |
4/1/2002 | 55.1 % |
5/1/2002 | 55.18 % |
6/1/2002 | 55.37 % |
7/1/2002 | 56.61 % |
8/1/2002 | 56.86 % |
9/1/2002 | 58.64 % |
10/1/2002 | 59.74 % |
11/1/2002 | 61.19 % |
12/1/2002 | 59.98 % |
1/1/2003 | 58.82 % |
2/1/2003 | 61.11 % |
3/1/2003 | 61.8 % |
4/1/2003 | 63.19 % |
5/1/2003 | 64.17 % |
6/1/2003 | 64.27 % |
7/1/2003 | 65.98 % |
8/1/2003 | 66.22 % |
9/1/2003 | 67.42 % |
10/1/2003 | 69.54 % |
11/1/2003 | 69.87 % |
12/1/2003 | 66.6 % |
1/1/2004 | 65.67 % |
2/1/2004 | 67.1 % |
3/1/2004 | 71.04 % |
4/1/2004 | 68.39 % |
5/1/2004 | 68.92 % |
6/1/2004 | 70.84 % |
7/1/2004 | 71.46 % |
8/1/2004 | 71.48 % |
9/1/2004 | 71.81 % |
10/1/2004 | 70.63 % |
11/1/2004 | 70.43 % |
12/1/2004 | 68.52 % |
1/1/2005 | 68.32 % |
2/1/2005 | 72.31 % |
3/1/2005 | 73.16 % |
4/1/2005 | 72.87 % |
5/1/2005 | 72.52 % |
6/1/2005 | 73.07 % |
7/1/2005 | 72.12 % |
8/1/2005 | 74.31 % |
9/1/2005 | 75.75 % |
10/1/2005 | 74 % |
11/1/2005 | 74.78 % |
12/1/2005 | 70.98 % |
1/1/2006 | 67.52 % |
2/1/2006 | 73.52 % |
3/1/2006 | 74.02 % |
4/1/2006 | 73.49 % |
5/1/2006 | 72.89 % |
6/1/2006 | 74.76 % |
7/1/2006 | 73.71 % |
8/1/2006 | 74.56 % |
9/1/2006 | 76.04 % |
10/1/2006 | 75.25 % |
11/1/2006 | 76.18 % |
12/1/2006 | 72.18 % |
1/1/2007 | 67.46 % |
2/1/2007 | 73.83 % |
3/1/2007 | 73.08 % |
4/1/2007 | 73.61 % |
5/1/2007 | 72.36 % |
6/1/2007 | 72.79 % |
7/1/2007 | 69.3 % |
8/1/2007 | 75.76 % |
9/1/2007 | 78.41 % |
10/1/2007 | 77.44 % |
11/1/2007 | 79.27 % |
12/1/2007 | 74.52 % |
1/1/2008 | 70.63 % |
2/1/2008 | 72.4 % |
3/1/2008 | 71.73 % |
4/1/2008 | 76.5 % |
5/1/2008 | 74.86 % |
6/1/2008 | 71.84 % |
7/1/2008 | 73.23 % |
8/1/2008 | 76.36 % |
9/1/2008 | 79.24 % |
10/1/2008 | 76.89 % |
11/1/2008 | 78.21 % |
12/1/2008 | 76.14 % |
1/1/2009 | 64.91 % |
2/1/2009 | 71.33 % |
3/1/2009 | 68.21 % |
4/1/2009 | 73.1 % |
5/1/2009 | 70.42 % |
6/1/2009 | 69.65 % |
7/1/2009 | 70.47 % |
8/1/2009 | 73.63 % |
9/1/2009 | 77.81 % |
10/1/2009 | 75.65 % |
11/1/2009 | 78.44 % |
12/1/2009 | 79.77 % |
1/1/2010 | 66.63 % |
2/1/2010 | 76.9 % |
3/1/2010 | 75.28 % |
4/1/2010 | 79.5 % |
5/1/2010 | 76.73 % |
6/1/2010 | 75.02 % |
7/1/2010 | 75.19 % |
8/1/2010 | 79.15 % |
9/1/2010 | 82.29 % |
10/1/2010 | 79.23 % |
11/1/2010 | 83.44 % |
12/1/2010 | 82.91 % |
1/1/2011 | 69.6 % |
2/1/2011 | 80.4 % |
3/1/2011 | 76.23 % |
4/1/2011 | 80.95 % |
5/1/2011 | 78.17 % |
6/1/2011 | 76.15 % |
7/1/2011 | 75.72 % |
8/1/2011 | 78.06 % |
9/1/2011 | 83.65 % |
10/1/2011 | 80.04 % |
11/1/2011 | 84.1 % |
12/1/2011 | 81.96 % |
1/1/2012 | 67.64 % |
2/1/2012 | 75.27 % |
3/1/2012 | 75.26 % |
4/1/2012 | 78.87 % |
5/1/2012 | 73.14 % |
6/1/2012 | 71.96 % |
7/1/2012 | 71.31 % |
8/1/2012 | 74.02 % |
9/1/2012 | 75.84 % |
10/1/2012 | 76.36 % |
11/1/2012 | 78.52 % |
12/1/2012 | 75.77 % |
1/1/2013 | 65.58 % |
2/1/2013 | 71.51 % |
3/1/2013 | 72.75 % |
4/1/2013 | 75.91 % |
5/1/2013 | 73.33 % |
6/1/2013 | 71.48 % |
7/1/2013 | 71.08 % |
8/1/2013 | 73 % |
9/1/2013 | 75.2 % |
10/1/2013 | 75.39 % |
11/1/2013 | 75.28 % |
12/1/2013 | 72.14 % |
1/1/2014 | 63.68 % |
2/1/2014 | 70.06 % |
3/1/2014 | 67.85 % |
4/1/2014 | 73.02 % |
5/1/2014 | 70.79 % |
6/1/2014 | 71.06 % |
7/1/2014 | 70.68 % |
8/1/2014 | 70.95 % |
9/1/2014 | 73.35 % |
10/1/2014 | 74.08 % |
11/1/2014 | 73.2 % |
12/1/2014 | 70.6 % |
1/1/2015 | 62.7 % |
2/1/2015 | 68.8 % |
3/1/2015 | 67.1 % |
4/1/2015 | 71.8 % |
5/1/2015 | 69.3 % |
6/1/2015 | 71 % |
7/1/2015 | 71.1 % |
8/1/2015 | 71.22 % |
9/1/2015 | 73.6 % |
10/1/2015 | 71.4 % |
1/1/2016 | 62.7 % |
2/1/2016 | 62 % |
3/1/2016 | 63.3 % |
4/1/2016 | 62.8 % |
5/1/2016 | 63.2 % |
6/1/2016 | 64.9 % |
7/1/2016 | 62 % |
8/1/2016 | 63.6 % |
9/1/2016 | 63.9 % |
10/1/2016 | 65.4 % |
11/1/2016 | 68.4 % |
12/1/2016 | 63.6 % |
1/1/2017 | 60.6 % |
2/1/2017 | 60 % |
3/1/2017 | 65.7 % |
4/1/2017 | 64.5 % |
5/1/2017 | 65.8 % |
6/1/2017 | 67.1 % |
7/1/2017 | 65.1 % |
8/1/2017 | 67.3 % |
9/1/2017 | 66.34 % |
10/1/2017 | 68.3 % |
11/1/2017 | 69.2 % |
12/1/2017 | 64.04 % |
1/1/2018 | 61.6 % |
2/1/2018 | 64.41 % |
3/1/2018 | 66.79 % |
4/1/2018 | 67.6 % |
5/1/2018 | 65.1 % |
6/1/2018 | 61.8 % |
7/1/2018 | 60.1 % |
8/1/2018 | 63 % |
9/1/2018 | 61.1 % |
10/1/2018 | 64.8 % |
11/1/2018 | 63.3 % |
12/1/2018 | 56.6 % |
1/1/2019 | 56.2 % |
2/1/2019 | 58.5 % |
3/1/2019 | 58.8 % |
4/1/2019 | 61.6 % |
5/1/2019 | 62 % |
6/1/2019 | 59.1 % |
7/1/2019 | 58.7 % |
8/1/2019 | 60.5 % |
9/1/2019 | 57.7 % |
10/1/2019 | 62.1 % |
11/1/2019 | 60.7 % |
12/1/2019 | 56.9 % |
1/1/2020 | 56.1 % |
2/1/2020 | 59.4 % |
3/1/2020 | 51.6 % |
4/1/2020 | 42 % |
5/1/2020 | 46.4 % |
6/1/2020 | 53.3 % |
7/1/2020 | 56.8 % |
8/1/2020 | 58.4 % |
9/1/2020 | 60.8 % |
10/1/2020 | 61.8 % |
11/1/2020 | 63.3 % |
12/1/2020 | 58.4 % |
1/1/2021 | 56.8 % |
2/1/2021 | 57.9 % |
3/1/2021 | 64.2 % |
4/1/2021 | 63.2 % |
5/1/2021 | 61.1 % |
6/1/2021 | 64.5 % |
7/1/2021 | 63.7 % |
8/1/2021 | 64 % |
9/1/2021 | 66.3 % |
10/1/2021 | 64.3 % |
11/1/2021 | 68.4 % |
12/1/2021 | 64 % |
1/1/2022 | 57.5 % |
2/1/2022 | 64 % |
3/1/2022 | 66.7 % |
4/1/2022 | 67.1 % |
5/1/2022 | 68 % |
6/1/2022 | 69.5 % |
7/1/2022 | 67.9 % |
8/1/2022 | 69.6 % |
9/1/2022 | 68.6 % |
10/1/2022 | 66.7 % |
11/1/2022 | 68.9 % |
12/1/2022 | 63.8 % |
1/1/2023 | 62 % |
2/1/2023 | 65 % |
3/1/2023 | 67.3 % |
4/1/2023 | 68.9 % |
5/1/2023 | 67.8 % |
6/1/2023 | 68.6 % |
7/1/2023 | 65 % |
8/1/2023 | 67.9 % |
9/1/2023 | 67.9 % |
10/1/2023 | 65.3 % |
11/1/2023 | 66.4 % |
12/1/2023 | 54.9 % |
1/1/2024 | 54.6 % |
2/1/2024 | 57.6 % |
3/1/2024 | 53.4 % |
4/1/2024 | 56.6 % |
5/1/2024 | 56.8 % |
6/1/2024 | 54.5 % |
7/1/2024 | 59.7 % |
Capacity Utilization History
Date | Value |
---|---|
7/1/2024 | 59.7 % |
6/1/2024 | 54.5 % |
5/1/2024 | 56.8 % |
4/1/2024 | 56.6 % |
3/1/2024 | 53.4 % |
2/1/2024 | 57.6 % |
1/1/2024 | 54.6 % |
12/1/2023 | 54.9 % |
11/1/2023 | 66.4 % |
10/1/2023 | 65.3 % |
Similar Macro Indicators to Capacity Utilization
Name | Current | Previous | Frequency |
---|---|---|---|
🇦🇷 Automobile production | 49,611 Units | 51,650 Units | Monthly |
🇦🇷 Changes in Inventory Levels | -3.295 B ARS | -29.291 B ARS | Quarter |
🇦🇷 Industrial production | -20.1 % | -14.8 % | Monthly |
🇦🇷 Industrial Production MoM | 1.8 % | -6.3 % | Monthly |
🇦🇷 Leading Indicator | 4.9 % | 2.81 % | Monthly |
🇦🇷 Vehicle Registrations | 33,043 Units | 32,333 Units | Monthly |
Macro pages for other countries in America
- 🇦🇼Aruba
- 🇧🇸Bahamas
- 🇧🇧Barbados
- 🇧🇿Belize
- 🇧🇲Bermuda
- 🇧🇴Bolivia
- 🇧🇷Brazil
- 🇨🇦Canada
- 🇰🇾Cayman Islands
- 🇨🇱Chile
- 🇨🇴Colombia
- 🇨🇷Costa Rica
- 🇨🇺Cuba
- 🇩🇴Dominican Republic
- 🇪🇨Ecuador
- 🇸🇻El Salvador
- 🇬🇹Guatemala
- 🇬🇾Guyana
- 🇭🇹Haiti
- 🇭🇳Honduras
- 🇯🇲Jamaica
- 🇲🇽Mexico
- 🇳🇮Nicaragua
- 🇵🇦Panama
- 🇵🇾Paraguay
- 🇵🇪Peru
- 🇵🇷Puerto Rico
- 🇸🇷Suriname
- 🇹🇹Trinidad and Tobago
- 🇺🇸United States
- 🇺🇾Uruguay
- 🇻🇪Venezuela
- 🇦🇬Antigua and Barbuda
- 🇩🇲Dominica
- 🇬🇩Grenada
What is Capacity Utilization?
Capacity Utilization: A Comprehensive Analysis Capacity utilization is a crucial macroeconomic indicator that measures the extent to which an enterprise or a nation effectively uses its productive capacity. This metric provides a nuanced insight into economic health, reflecting how well resources, such as machinery and labor, are being employed in the production process. At Eulerpool, we understand the significance of this indicator and provide meticulously curated data to support analysts, policymakers, and industry stakeholders in their decision-making processes. Understanding Capacity Utilization Capacity utilization is often expressed as a percentage, indicating the ratio of actual output to potential output. Potential output refers to the maximum amount of goods and services that can be produced when operating at full capacity. For instance, if a factory produces 800 units of a product per month but has the potential to produce 1,000 units, its capacity utilization rate would be 80%. This percentage is critical as it reflects the balance between supply and demand in the economy. Businesses aim for an optimal capacity utilization rate to maximize efficiency and profitability. Too low a percentage suggests underutilization of resources, leading to increased per-unit production costs and potential losses. Conversely, a rate that is excessively high might indicate overuse of resources, leading to equipment fatigue and increased maintenance costs, ultimately stressing the production process. Economic Implications of Capacity Utilization The measure of capacity utilization has profound implications across various facets of the economy. Firstly, it serves as an indicator of inflationary pressures. When capacity utilization nears full capacity – around 80% to 85% for many industries – there may be upward pressure on prices as businesses struggle to meet rising demand. This often correlates with higher wage demands as employers compete for scarce labor, further fueling inflation. On the other hand, persistently low capacity utilization rates may signal economic slack, where unemployment remains high, and businesses refrain from capital investment due to weak demand. This can lead to deflationary pressures and create a risk of economic stagnation. Applications in Policy and Business Decisions Macroeconomic policymakers, particularly central banks, closely monitor capacity utilization rates to inform monetary policy decisions. A central bank may change interest rates to control inflation or stimulate economic activity based on the observed capacity utilization trends. For instance, high utilization rates might lead to a tightening of monetary policy to prevent the economy from overheating, while low rates could prompt expansionary policies to foster growth. From a business perspective, capacity utilization data assists in strategic planning and operational efficiency. Companies can make informed decisions regarding capital investments, workforce adjustments, and inventory management based on their capacity utilization insights. For example, a firm experiencing high utilization rates might consider expanding its production facilities or investing in new technologies to prevent bottlenecks and capitalize on increased demand. Sectoral Analysis Capacity utilization rates can vary significantly between different sectors of the economy, offering sector-specific insights. For example, the manufacturing sector often has a well-defined productive capacity, making its utilization data particularly illustrative of economic trends. High utilization rates in manufacturing may indicate robust industrial activity and economic growth, whereas low rates might suggest industrial slowdown or a potential recession. In contrast, service industries often face more fluid definitions of capacity due to intangible outputs and flexible workforce arrangements. Consequently, interpreting capacity utilization in service sectors requires a deeper understanding of contextual factors such as service quality, labor productivity, and technological integration. Global Perspectives Capacity utilization is not confined to domestic analysis but also has international dimensions. Comparing capacity utilization rates across countries provides insights into global economic dynamics. For instance, high utilization rates in emerging economies might indicate rapid industrialization and economic expansion, while developed economies with moderate rates might reflect stable, mature markets. Moreover, global supply chains mean that capacity utilization in one country can have ripple effects worldwide. For example, high utilization rates in semiconductor manufacturing hubs can affect technology production globally, influencing prices and availability of electronic goods. Thus, understanding global capacity utilization trends is vital for multinational businesses and international trade analysts. Challenges in Measurement and Interpretation While capacity utilization is a valuable economic indicator, it is not without its challenges. Accurately measuring potential output, especially in terms of quality adjustments and technological advancements, can be complex. Factors such as downtime for maintenance, seasonal variations, and changes in workforce productivity must be meticulously accounted for to ensure reliable data. Additionally, interpreting capacity utilization requires consideration of broader economic conditions. A high capacity utilization rate in a booming economy may have different implications than during a period of hyperinflation. Therefore, analysts must contextualize capacity utilization within the broader economic narrative to derive meaningful conclusions. Future Trends The future of capacity utilization measurement lies in advanced data analytics and real-time monitoring. The integration of Internet of Things (IoT) technologies and big data analytics can provide more accurate, dynamic insights into production processes. Predictive analytics will enable businesses to anticipate capacity issues and optimize operations proactively. Furthermore, as economies increasingly pivot toward digital and service-oriented structures, the definition and measurement of capacity utilization will evolve. Understanding how to measure and interpret capacity in these sectors will be crucial for maintaining economic stability and fostering growth. Conclusion Capacity utilization stands as a pivotal metric in understanding the intricate balances within an economy. At Eulerpool, our commitment to providing comprehensive, accurate macroeconomic data ensures that stakeholders have the insights needed to navigate complex economic landscapes. Whether it's guiding policy decisions, informing business strategies, or analyzing sectoral trends, capacity utilization remains a cornerstone of economic analysis. By leveraging our detailed datasets and expert analyses, users can derive nuanced, actionable insights to drive growth and stability in their respective domains.