Access the world's leading financial data and tools
Subscribe for $2 Afghanistan Military Expenditure
Price
The current value of the Military Expenditure in Afghanistan is 278.3 M USD. The Military Expenditure in Afghanistan decreased to 278.3 M USD on 1/1/2021, after it was 279.6 M USD on 1/1/2020. From 1/1/1970 to 1/1/2021, the average GDP in Afghanistan was 167.65 M USD. The all-time high was reached on 1/1/2011 with 325.8 M USD, while the lowest value was recorded on 1/1/1970 with 2.9 M USD.
Military Expenditure ·
3 years
5 years
10 years
25 Years
Max
Military expenditures | |
---|---|
1/1/1970 | 2.9 M USD |
1/1/1973 | 3.3 M USD |
1/1/1974 | 3.6 M USD |
1/1/1975 | 4.2 M USD |
1/1/1976 | 5.4 M USD |
1/1/1977 | 6.1 M USD |
1/1/2004 | 125.1 M USD |
1/1/2005 | 122.7 M USD |
1/1/2006 | 131.3 M USD |
1/1/2007 | 219.6 M USD |
1/1/2008 | 240.5 M USD |
1/1/2009 | 251.9 M USD |
1/1/2010 | 298.1 M USD |
1/1/2011 | 325.8 M USD |
1/1/2012 | 238.6 M USD |
1/1/2013 | 217.2 M USD |
1/1/2014 | 268.2 M USD |
1/1/2015 | 199.5 M USD |
1/1/2016 | 185.9 M USD |
1/1/2017 | 191.4 M USD |
1/1/2018 | 198.1 M USD |
1/1/2019 | 226.3 M USD |
1/1/2020 | 279.6 M USD |
1/1/2021 | 278.3 M USD |
Military Expenditure History
Date | Value |
---|---|
1/1/2021 | 278.3 M USD |
1/1/2020 | 279.6 M USD |
1/1/2019 | 226.3 M USD |
1/1/2018 | 198.1 M USD |
1/1/2017 | 191.4 M USD |
1/1/2016 | 185.9 M USD |
1/1/2015 | 199.5 M USD |
1/1/2014 | 268.2 M USD |
1/1/2013 | 217.2 M USD |
1/1/2012 | 238.6 M USD |
Similar Macro Indicators to Military Expenditure
Name | Current | Previous | Frequency |
---|---|---|---|
🇦🇫 Corruption Index | 20 Points | 24 Points | Annually |
🇦🇫 Corruption Rank | 162 | 150 | Annually |
🇦🇫 Government budget | -3.1 % of GDP | -4.5 % of GDP | Annually |
🇦🇫 Government Debt to GDP Ratio | 7.4 % of GDP | 6.13 % of GDP | Annually |
🇦🇫 Government Spending | 280.374 B AFN | 266.029 B AFN | Annually |
🇦🇫 Government Spending to GDP | 21.8 % of GDP | 21.3 % of GDP | Annually |
🇦🇫 Value of the State Budget | -40.337 B AFN | -55.254 B AFN | Annually |
Macro pages for other countries in Asia
- 🇨🇳China
- 🇮🇳India
- 🇮🇩Indonesia
- 🇯🇵Japan
- 🇸🇦Saudi Arabia
- 🇸🇬Singapore
- 🇰🇷South Korea
- 🇹🇷Turkey
- 🇦🇲Armenia
- 🇦🇿Azerbaijan
- 🇧🇭Bahrain
- 🇧🇩Bangladesh
- 🇧🇹Bhutan
- 🇧🇳Brunei
- 🇰🇭Cambodia
- 🇹🇱East Timor
- 🇬🇪Georgia
- 🇭🇰Hong Kong
- 🇮🇷Iran
- 🇮🇶Iraq
- 🇮🇱Israel
- 🇯🇴Jordan
- 🇰🇿Kazakhstan
- 🇰🇼Kuwait
- 🇰🇬Kyrgyzstan
- 🇱🇦Laos
- 🇱🇧Lebanon
- 🇲🇴Macau
- 🇲🇾Malaysia
- 🇲🇻Maldives
- 🇲🇳Mongolia
- 🇲🇲Myanmar
- 🇳🇵Nepal
- 🇰🇵North Korea
- 🇴🇲Oman
- 🇵🇰Pakistan
- 🇵🇸Palestine
- 🇵🇭Philippines
- 🇶🇦Qatar
- 🇱🇰Sri Lanka
- 🇸🇾Syria
- 🇹🇼Taiwan
- 🇹🇯Tajikistan
- 🇹🇭Thailand
- 🇹🇲Turkmenistan
- 🇦🇪United Arab Emirates
- 🇺🇿Uzbekistan
- 🇻🇳Vietnam
- 🇾🇪Yemen
What is Military Expenditure?
Military expenditure represents a crucial component within the broader scope of macroeconomic analysis, serving as a significant indicator of a nation's defense capabilities, strategic priorities, and fiscal health. As a professional entity dedicated to furnishing comprehensive macroeconomic data, Eulerpool recognizes the critical importance of understanding and contextualizing military expenditure in the global economy. This article aims to provide an exhaustive exploration of military expenditure, discussing its determinants, implications, trends, and the associated economic theories. Military expenditure, broadly defined, encompasses the financial resources allocated by a nation towards the maintenance and enhancement of its armed forces. This includes spending on personnel salaries, operational costs, procurement of arms and equipment, research and development, as well as infrastructure outlays. The scope of military expenditure transcends mere budgetary allocations, reflecting a nation's security policy, geopolitical ambitions, and readiness to address both conventional and unconventional threats. A fundamental aspect of analyzing military expenditure involves examining its determinants. These determinants are multifaceted, involving both internal and external factors. Internally, the fiscal capacity of a nation plays a pivotal role. Nations with robust economies are better equipped to allocate substantial funds towards defense without compromising other critical sectors such as healthcare, education, and social services. Conversely, countries grappling with economic instability may find it challenging to sustain high levels of military spending without incurring detrimental effects on their overall fiscal stability. Externally, the geopolitical landscape exerts a profound influence on a nation's military expenditure. Nations situated in volatile regions often face heightened security threats, necessitating greater investment in defense to ensure national security. Historical rivalries, regional conflicts, and global alliances also shape military spending patterns. For instance, membership in international alliances such as NATO often entails commitments to maintaining certain defense spending thresholds, mandating member states to align their budgets accordingly. Another crucial analytical dimension involves the implications of military expenditure on the broader economy. While high defense spending can bolster national security and stimulate economic growth through the creation of jobs and technological advancements, it can also engender significant trade-offs. The concept of 'guns versus butter' epitomizes this trade-off, highlighting the opportunity cost of allocating funds to the military at the expense of other vital socioeconomic priorities. Excessive military spending can constrain development by diverting resources from critical sectors, thereby impeding long-term economic growth and social wellbeing. Moreover, the economic theories surrounding military expenditure offer intricate insights into its role and impact. The Keynesian perspective posits that government spending, including military expenditure, can serve as a potent tool for economic stabilization and growth, particularly during periods of recession. Military spending can stimulate demand within the economy, potentially leading to increased production and employment. Conversely, the classical economic viewpoint emphasizes the potential inefficiencies and distortions associated with high levels of defense spending, arguing that it can crowd out private investment and impose a burden on taxpayers. Over the years, global military expenditure has exhibited noteworthy trends. According to data from SIPRI (Stockholm International Peace Research Institute), global military spending has consistently risen, driven by escalating geopolitical tensions, technological advancements, and the evolving nature of warfare. In recent years, significant increases have been observed in major powers such as the United States, China, and Russia, reflecting their strategic objectives and security concerns. The emergence of new security threats, including cyber warfare and terrorism, has also prompted nations to allocate significant resources towards developing sophisticated defense mechanisms. In addition, regional disparities in military expenditure are pronounced. While developed nations generally allocate substantial portions of their budgets towards defense, developing countries often face more significant constraints. However, certain emerging economies with rising geopolitical aspirations, such as India and Saudi Arabia, have also markedly ramped up their defense spending. This complex interplay of regional dynamics, economic capacities, and strategic priorities underscores the intricate nature of military expenditure. Furthermore, the transparency and accountability associated with military expenditure vary widely across different countries. While some nations publish detailed defense budgets, offering transparency and facilitating informed analysis, others maintain opacity, often citing national security concerns. This lack of transparency can hinder comprehensive assessments and comparisons, posing challenges for policymakers, analysts, and stakeholders. In conclusion, military expenditure constitutes a critical domain within macroeconomic analysis, embodying a nation's security imperatives, economic capabilities, and strategic ambitions. As elucidated, its determinants are multifaceted, encompassing both internal fiscal capacities and external geopolitical dynamics. The implications of military expenditure on broader economic paradigms are profound, straddling the dichotomy of national security enhancement and potential developmental trade-offs. Understanding these complexities necessitates a multifaceted analytical approach, integrating economic theories, historical trends, and regional disparities. At Eulerpool, we are committed to providing enriched, granular data on military expenditure, enabling our users to navigate this intricate landscape with analytical precision. Our platform is designed to offer robust, comprehensive insights, fostering informed decision-making and strategic foresight. As the global geopolitical and economic milieu continues to evolve, the importance of understanding military expenditure within the broader macroeconomic context remains paramount, underscoring our dedication to delivering high-caliber, actionable intelligence to our users.