Quantum Technology Facing Challenges: Rigetti Computing Experiences Dramatic Price Drop
Eulerpool Research Systems •Jan 9, 2025
Takeaways NEW
- Market Volatility and Uncertainties about the Future of Quantum Computing Increase the Pressure.
- Rigetti Computing suffers a 45% stock price drop after Nvidia CEO warning.
Rigetti Computing's stock price lost 45% of its value in a single trading session after statements by Nvidia's CEO Jensen Huang at CES 2025 made the rounds. Huang warned that the practical application of quantum computing technology might be 15 to 20 years away. These statements led to a massive sell-off in the quantum computing industry, severely affecting Rigetti and competitors like IonQ.
Despite a slight increase of 2.8% to $10.33 in after-hours trading, analysts remain skeptical about Rigetti's future prospects. At the beginning of the month, the stock reached a record high of $19.38, fueled by speculative interest. However, concerns over overvaluation and persistent revenue declines outweigh. Forbes sets the twelve-month price target at $5.20, indicating a further decline of 49.1%.
Additional investor fears are amplified by increased cash outflows and market volatility. Volatility in quantum computing stocks rose from 22% to 35% per week over the past year. Rigetti's short interest ratio is at 0.6, indicating a slightly pessimistic market sentiment in an otherwise calm trading environment.
This sharp decline in stock price highlights both the long-term opportunities and short-term risks of the quantum computing industry. Investors are advised to closely monitor Rigetti's fundamental metrics and operational performance as the company navigates these challenges.
Eulerpool Markets
Finance Markets
New ReleaseEnterprise Grade
Institutional
Financial Data
Access comprehensive financial data with unmatched coverage and precision. Trusted by the world's leading financial institutions.
- 10M+ securities worldwide
- 100K+ daily updates
- 50-year historical data
- Comprehensive ESG metrics

Save up to 68%
vs. legacy vendors