Access the world's leading financial data and tools
Subscribe for $2 Malaysia Government Debt to Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
Price
The current value of the Government Debt to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in Malaysia is 63.4 % of GDP. The Government Debt to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in Malaysia increased to 63.4 % of GDP on 1/1/2021, after it was 62.1 % of GDP on 1/1/2020. From 1/1/1970 to 1/1/2022, the average GDP in Malaysia was 54.24 % of GDP. The all-time high was reached on 1/1/1986 with 103.4 % of GDP, while the lowest value was recorded on 1/1/1997 with 31.9 % of GDP.
Government Debt to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) ·
3 years
5 years
10 years
25 Years
Max
Government Debt to GDP Ratio | |
---|---|
1/1/1970 | 42.4 % of GDP |
1/1/1971 | 47.1 % of GDP |
1/1/1972 | 51.5 % of GDP |
1/1/1973 | 43.3 % of GDP |
1/1/1974 | 40.2 % of GDP |
1/1/1975 | 51 % of GDP |
1/1/1976 | 48.8 % of GDP |
1/1/1977 | 49.3 % of GDP |
1/1/1978 | 46.6 % of GDP |
1/1/1979 | 44.9 % of GDP |
1/1/1980 | 44 % of GDP |
1/1/1981 | 54 % of GDP |
1/1/1982 | 66.9 % of GDP |
1/1/1983 | 73.4 % of GDP |
1/1/1984 | 72.8 % of GDP |
1/1/1985 | 82.5 % of GDP |
1/1/1986 | 103.4 % of GDP |
1/1/1987 | 101.7 % of GDP |
1/1/1988 | 96.4 % of GDP |
1/1/1989 | 85.5 % of GDP |
1/1/1990 | 79.5 % of GDP |
1/1/1991 | 73.3 % of GDP |
1/1/1992 | 64.4 % of GDP |
1/1/1993 | 55.7 % of GDP |
1/1/1994 | 47.6 % of GDP |
1/1/1995 | 41.1 % of GDP |
1/1/1996 | 35.3 % of GDP |
1/1/1997 | 31.9 % of GDP |
1/1/1998 | 36.4 % of GDP |
1/1/1999 | 37.3 % of GDP |
1/1/2000 | 35.2 % of GDP |
1/1/2001 | 41.3 % of GDP |
1/1/2002 | 43 % of GDP |
1/1/2003 | 45.1 % of GDP |
1/1/2004 | 45.7 % of GDP |
1/1/2005 | 42.1 % of GDP |
1/1/2006 | 40.6 % of GDP |
1/1/2007 | 40.1 % of GDP |
1/1/2008 | 39.8 % of GDP |
1/1/2009 | 50.8 % of GDP |
1/1/2010 | 49.6 % of GDP |
1/1/2011 | 50 % of GDP |
1/1/2012 | 51.6 % of GDP |
1/1/2013 | 53 % of GDP |
1/1/2014 | 52.7 % of GDP |
1/1/2015 | 53.6 % of GDP |
1/1/2016 | 51.9 % of GDP |
1/1/2017 | 50 % of GDP |
1/1/2018 | 51.2 % of GDP |
1/1/2019 | 52.5 % of GDP |
1/1/2020 | 62.1 % of GDP |
1/1/2021 | 63.4 % of GDP |
Government Debt to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) History
Date | Value |
---|---|
1/1/2021 | 63.4 % of GDP |
1/1/2020 | 62.1 % of GDP |
1/1/2019 | 52.5 % of GDP |
1/1/2018 | 51.2 % of GDP |
1/1/2017 | 50 % of GDP |
1/1/2016 | 51.9 % of GDP |
1/1/2015 | 53.6 % of GDP |
1/1/2014 | 52.7 % of GDP |
1/1/2013 | 53 % of GDP |
1/1/2012 | 51.6 % of GDP |
Similar Macro Indicators to Government Debt to Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
Name | Current | Previous | Frequency |
---|---|---|---|
🇲🇾 Corruption Index | 50 Points | 47 Points | Annually |
🇲🇾 Corruption Rank | 57 | 61 | Annually |
🇲🇾 Fiscal Expenditure | 97.735 B MYR | 69.72 B MYR | Quarter |
🇲🇾 Government budget | -5 % of GDP | -5.6 % of GDP | Annually |
🇲🇾 Government Spending | 48.685 B MYR | 64.524 B MYR | Quarter |
🇲🇾 Military expenditures | 3.899 B USD | 3.674 B USD | Annually |
🇲🇾 Public revenue | 88.662 B MYR | 77.856 B MYR | Quarter |
🇲🇾 Value of the State Budget | -9.073 B MYR | 8.135 B MYR | Quarter |
Government debt as a percentage of GDP is commonly utilized by investors to assess a country’s capacity to meet future debt obligations. This metric influences the nation's borrowing costs and the yields on its government bonds.
Macro pages for other countries in Asia
- 🇨🇳China
- 🇮🇳India
- 🇮🇩Indonesia
- 🇯🇵Japan
- 🇸🇦Saudi Arabia
- 🇸🇬Singapore
- 🇰🇷South Korea
- 🇹🇷Turkey
- 🇦🇫Afghanistan
- 🇦🇲Armenia
- 🇦🇿Azerbaijan
- 🇧🇭Bahrain
- 🇧🇩Bangladesh
- 🇧🇹Bhutan
- 🇧🇳Brunei
- 🇰🇭Cambodia
- 🇹🇱East Timor
- 🇬🇪Georgia
- 🇭🇰Hong Kong
- 🇮🇷Iran
- 🇮🇶Iraq
- 🇮🇱Israel
- 🇯🇴Jordan
- 🇰🇿Kazakhstan
- 🇰🇼Kuwait
- 🇰🇬Kyrgyzstan
- 🇱🇦Laos
- 🇱🇧Lebanon
- 🇲🇴Macau
- 🇲🇻Maldives
- 🇲🇳Mongolia
- 🇲🇲Myanmar
- 🇳🇵Nepal
- 🇰🇵North Korea
- 🇴🇲Oman
- 🇵🇰Pakistan
- 🇵🇸Palestine
- 🇵🇭Philippines
- 🇶🇦Qatar
- 🇱🇰Sri Lanka
- 🇸🇾Syria
- 🇹🇼Taiwan
- 🇹🇯Tajikistan
- 🇹🇭Thailand
- 🇹🇲Turkmenistan
- 🇦🇪United Arab Emirates
- 🇺🇿Uzbekistan
- 🇻🇳Vietnam
- 🇾🇪Yemen
What is Government Debt to Gross Domestic Product (GDP)?
Government Debt to GDP: Understanding its Role and Implications for Economic Stability Government Debt to GDP is a critical macroeconomic indicator that offers deep insights into a country's fiscal health and economic stability. For professional economic platforms like Eulerpool, which provides comprehensive macroeconomic data, it is imperative to present a nuanced understanding of this pivotal ratio. This indicator, also known as the debt-to-GDP ratio, compares a nation's public debt to its gross domestic product (GDP), offering a gauge of the country's ability to manage and repay its debt. The significance of the Government Debt to GDP ratio cannot be understated. It is a key measure used by economists, policymakers, investors, and international organizations to assess the sustainability of a country's fiscal policies. A higher debt-to-GDP ratio suggests that a country may struggle to pay off its debts without incurring further debt, while a lower ratio indicates a healthier balance between debt and national economic output. To understand the Government Debt to GDP ratio comprehensively, it is essential to delve into the components that constitute this measure. Public debt, often referred to as national or sovereign debt, includes all government liabilities that must be paid in the future. This debt can be categorized into domestic and external debt, reflecting the varied sources of borrowing. On the other hand, GDP is the total value of all goods and services produced within a country during a specific period, usually measured annually. It serves as a broad indicator of economic activity and health. A fundamental aspect of this ratio is its role in shaping fiscal policies. Governments use this ratio to decide on fiscal measures such as spending cuts, tax hikes, or stimulus programs. For instance, a high debt-to-GDP ratio may compel a government to adopt austerity measures to curb excessive public spending and stabilize the economy. Conversely, a low ratio might provide the fiscal space to implement expansionary policies aimed at boosting economic growth. International financial institutions like the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank closely monitor the Government Debt to GDP ratios of countries worldwide. They use this information to formulate economic policies, provide financial assistance, and offer recommendations tailored to individual country's fiscal situations. Furthermore, credit rating agencies, such as Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s, and Fitch Ratings, rely heavily on this ratio to determine the creditworthiness of nations. A deteriorating debt-to-GDP ratio could lead to a downgrade in a country’s credit rating, subsequently increasing borrowing costs and impacting investor confidence. The impact of Government Debt to GDP is multifaceted and varies across different economic environments. For developed economies with stable financial systems, a high debt-to-GDP ratio might be manageable due to reliable revenue streams and strong institutional frameworks. For example, Japan, with one of the highest debt-to-GDP ratios globally, manages its economic obligations through robust domestic savings and substantial foreign exchange reserves. In contrast, developing economies often face heightened risks with increasing debt-to-GDP ratios due to volatile revenue bases, weak institutions, and susceptibility to external shocks. Examining historical data on Government Debt to GDP provides valuable insights into economic trends and fiscal practices. During periods of economic downturns, such as the global financial crisis of 2008 or the COVID-19 pandemic, countries typically experience a surge in debt-to-GDP ratios. This increase is primarily driven by deficit spending aimed at stimulating economic activity and supporting affected populations. Analyzing such patterns helps economists and policymakers anticipate the potential long-term impacts of fiscal interventions and adjust strategies accordingly. Another critical aspect related to the Government Debt to GDP ratio is its influence on inflation and monetary policy. An elevated debt level can lead to increased demand for government bonds, potentially driving up interest rates. Central banks may respond to these pressures by adjusting monetary policies, such as altering interest rates or engaging in quantitative easing to manage economic stability. Furthermore, excessive government borrowing could lead to inflationary pressures if financed through the creation of money, thereby eroding the purchasing power of the currency. The fiscal discipline of managing the Government Debt to GDP ratio requires a delicate balancing act. Governments need to navigate the fine line between fostering economic growth and maintaining sustainable debt levels. Failure to do so can lead to severe economic consequences, such as default scenarios, where countries are unable to meet their debt obligations. Argentina’s repeated debt crises serve as a case study, highlighting the profound implications of unsustainable fiscal practices and the resultant socioeconomic disruptions. For investors and stakeholders, a clear understanding of a nation’s Government Debt to GDP ratio is paramount. It informs investment strategies, risk assessments, and portfolio diversification decisions. Countries with manageable debt levels are perceived as safer investment destinations, attracting foreign investment and bolstering economic growth. Conversely, nations with high debt ratios may face capital flight, currency depreciation, and reduced investor confidence, exacerbating economic vulnerabilities. In conclusion, the Government Debt to GDP ratio is an indispensable tool in the realm of macroeconomics, guiding a host of fiscal and economic decisions. Its implications span across policy formulation, international financial stability, investment strategies, and more. As a professional platform dedicated to macroeconomic data, Eulerpool emphasizes the need for a thorough and contextual understanding of this ratio. By analyzing the interplay between government debt and economic output, we can better predict, manage, and navigate the complexities of global economic landscapes, ensuring informed decision-making and sustained economic resilience.