Access the world's leading financial data and tools
Subscribe for $2 
Canada Employment Rate
Price
The current value of the Employment Rate in Canada is 60.8 %. The Employment Rate in Canada decreased to 60.8 % on 8/1/2024, after it was 60.9 % on 7/1/2024. From 1/1/1976 to 9/1/2024, the average GDP in Canada was 60.45 %. The all-time high was reached on 2/1/2008 with 63.6 %, while the lowest value was recorded on 4/1/2020 with 51.9 %.
Employment Rate ·
3 years
5 years
10 years
25 Years
Max
| Employment rate | |
|---|---|
| 1/1/1976 | 57.2 % |
| 2/1/1976 | 57.2 % |
| 3/1/1976 | 57.3 % |
| 4/1/1976 | 57.4 % |
| 5/1/1976 | 57.2 % |
| 6/1/1976 | 57.2 % |
| 7/1/1976 | 57.1 % |
| 8/1/1976 | 57.1 % |
| 9/1/1976 | 57.1 % |
| 10/1/1976 | 56.9 % |
| 11/1/1976 | 57.1 % |
| 12/1/1976 | 57.2 % |
| 1/1/1977 | 57.1 % |
| 2/1/1977 | 57.1 % |
| 3/1/1977 | 56.9 % |
| 4/1/1977 | 57 % |
| 5/1/1977 | 57 % |
| 6/1/1977 | 56.9 % |
| 7/1/1977 | 56.8 % |
| 8/1/1977 | 56.8 % |
| 9/1/1977 | 56.7 % |
| 10/1/1977 | 56.8 % |
| 11/1/1977 | 56.8 % |
| 12/1/1977 | 56.9 % |
| 1/1/1978 | 56.8 % |
| 2/1/1978 | 57 % |
| 3/1/1978 | 57.1 % |
| 4/1/1978 | 57.2 % |
| 5/1/1978 | 57.2 % |
| 6/1/1978 | 57.5 % |
| 7/1/1978 | 57.6 % |
| 8/1/1978 | 57.7 % |
| 9/1/1978 | 57.7 % |
| 10/1/1978 | 58 % |
| 11/1/1978 | 58 % |
| 12/1/1978 | 58.2 % |
| 1/1/1979 | 58.4 % |
| 2/1/1979 | 58.3 % |
| 3/1/1979 | 58.5 % |
| 4/1/1979 | 58.5 % |
| 5/1/1979 | 58.7 % |
| 6/1/1979 | 58.8 % |
| 7/1/1979 | 59 % |
| 8/1/1979 | 59.1 % |
| 9/1/1979 | 59.1 % |
| 10/1/1979 | 59.3 % |
| 11/1/1979 | 59.4 % |
| 12/1/1979 | 59.4 % |
| 1/1/1980 | 59.4 % |
| 2/1/1980 | 59.4 % |
| 3/1/1980 | 59.3 % |
| 4/1/1980 | 59.4 % |
| 5/1/1980 | 59.1 % |
| 6/1/1980 | 59.2 % |
| 7/1/1980 | 59.1 % |
| 8/1/1980 | 59.2 % |
| 9/1/1980 | 59.5 % |
| 10/1/1980 | 59.6 % |
| 11/1/1980 | 59.8 % |
| 12/1/1980 | 59.8 % |
| 1/1/1981 | 60 % |
| 2/1/1981 | 60.3 % |
| 3/1/1981 | 60.2 % |
| 4/1/1981 | 60.4 % |
| 5/1/1981 | 60.4 % |
| 6/1/1981 | 60.5 % |
| 7/1/1981 | 60.2 % |
| 8/1/1981 | 60.2 % |
| 9/1/1981 | 60 % |
| 10/1/1981 | 59.8 % |
| 11/1/1981 | 59.7 % |
| 12/1/1981 | 59.3 % |
| 1/1/1982 | 59.1 % |
| 2/1/1982 | 58.8 % |
| 3/1/1982 | 58.6 % |
| 4/1/1982 | 58.2 % |
| 5/1/1982 | 57.8 % |
| 6/1/1982 | 57.3 % |
| 7/1/1982 | 57 % |
| 8/1/1982 | 56.6 % |
| 9/1/1982 | 56.4 % |
| 10/1/1982 | 56.2 % |
| 11/1/1982 | 56.1 % |
| 12/1/1982 | 56 % |
| 1/1/1983 | 56.1 % |
| 2/1/1983 | 56.2 % |
| 3/1/1983 | 56.4 % |
| 4/1/1983 | 56.6 % |
| 5/1/1983 | 56.7 % |
| 6/1/1983 | 57 % |
| 7/1/1983 | 57.2 % |
| 8/1/1983 | 57.4 % |
| 9/1/1983 | 57.6 % |
| 10/1/1983 | 57.5 % |
| 11/1/1983 | 57.4 % |
| 12/1/1983 | 57.5 % |
| 1/1/1984 | 57.3 % |
| 2/1/1984 | 57.4 % |
| 3/1/1984 | 57.4 % |
| 4/1/1984 | 57.3 % |
| 5/1/1984 | 57.5 % |
| 6/1/1984 | 57.8 % |
| 7/1/1984 | 57.9 % |
| 8/1/1984 | 57.8 % |
| 9/1/1984 | 57.9 % |
| 10/1/1984 | 57.9 % |
| 11/1/1984 | 57.8 % |
| 12/1/1984 | 58 % |
| 1/1/1985 | 58.2 % |
| 2/1/1985 | 58.3 % |
| 3/1/1985 | 58.3 % |
| 4/1/1985 | 58.5 % |
| 5/1/1985 | 58.6 % |
| 6/1/1985 | 58.6 % |
| 7/1/1985 | 58.8 % |
| 8/1/1985 | 58.9 % |
| 9/1/1985 | 58.9 % |
| 10/1/1985 | 59 % |
| 11/1/1985 | 59.3 % |
| 12/1/1985 | 59.4 % |
| 1/1/1986 | 59.6 % |
| 2/1/1986 | 59.6 % |
| 3/1/1986 | 59.6 % |
| 4/1/1986 | 59.9 % |
| 5/1/1986 | 59.7 % |
| 6/1/1986 | 59.8 % |
| 7/1/1986 | 59.8 % |
| 8/1/1986 | 59.8 % |
| 9/1/1986 | 59.7 % |
| 10/1/1986 | 59.8 % |
| 11/1/1986 | 59.9 % |
| 12/1/1986 | 59.8 % |
| 1/1/1987 | 59.8 % |
| 2/1/1987 | 59.9 % |
| 3/1/1987 | 60.1 % |
| 4/1/1987 | 60.3 % |
| 5/1/1987 | 60.5 % |
| 6/1/1987 | 60.6 % |
| 7/1/1987 | 60.6 % |
| 8/1/1987 | 60.7 % |
| 9/1/1987 | 60.9 % |
| 10/1/1987 | 61.1 % |
| 11/1/1987 | 61.2 % |
| 12/1/1987 | 61.5 % |
| 1/1/1988 | 61.5 % |
| 2/1/1988 | 61.6 % |
| 3/1/1988 | 61.7 % |
| 4/1/1988 | 61.7 % |
| 5/1/1988 | 61.6 % |
| 6/1/1988 | 61.6 % |
| 7/1/1988 | 61.6 % |
| 8/1/1988 | 61.6 % |
| 9/1/1988 | 61.6 % |
| 10/1/1988 | 61.7 % |
| 11/1/1988 | 61.8 % |
| 12/1/1988 | 62 % |
| 1/1/1989 | 62.2 % |
| 2/1/1989 | 62.2 % |
| 3/1/1989 | 62.4 % |
| 4/1/1989 | 62.2 % |
| 5/1/1989 | 62.1 % |
| 6/1/1989 | 62.2 % |
| 7/1/1989 | 62.1 % |
| 8/1/1989 | 62.2 % |
| 9/1/1989 | 62.2 % |
| 10/1/1989 | 62.1 % |
| 11/1/1989 | 62.1 % |
| 12/1/1989 | 62.1 % |
| 1/1/1990 | 62.2 % |
| 2/1/1990 | 62.3 % |
| 3/1/1990 | 62.2 % |
| 4/1/1990 | 62.2 % |
| 5/1/1990 | 61.9 % |
| 6/1/1990 | 62 % |
| 7/1/1990 | 61.8 % |
| 8/1/1990 | 61.6 % |
| 9/1/1990 | 61.5 % |
| 10/1/1990 | 61.2 % |
| 11/1/1990 | 60.8 % |
| 12/1/1990 | 60.5 % |
| 1/1/1991 | 60.3 % |
| 2/1/1991 | 60 % |
| 3/1/1991 | 59.7 % |
| 4/1/1991 | 59.8 % |
| 5/1/1991 | 59.9 % |
| 6/1/1991 | 59.9 % |
| 7/1/1991 | 59.7 % |
| 8/1/1991 | 59.7 % |
| 9/1/1991 | 59.5 % |
| 10/1/1991 | 59.5 % |
| 11/1/1991 | 59.3 % |
| 12/1/1991 | 59.1 % |
| 1/1/1992 | 59 % |
| 2/1/1992 | 58.8 % |
| 3/1/1992 | 58.6 % |
| 4/1/1992 | 58.5 % |
| 5/1/1992 | 58.5 % |
| 6/1/1992 | 58.3 % |
| 7/1/1992 | 58.3 % |
| 8/1/1992 | 58.1 % |
| 9/1/1992 | 58 % |
| 10/1/1992 | 58 % |
| 11/1/1992 | 57.9 % |
| 12/1/1992 | 58 % |
| 1/1/1993 | 58.1 % |
| 2/1/1993 | 58 % |
| 3/1/1993 | 58.1 % |
| 4/1/1993 | 57.9 % |
| 5/1/1993 | 57.8 % |
| 6/1/1993 | 57.9 % |
| 7/1/1993 | 57.9 % |
| 8/1/1993 | 57.9 % |
| 9/1/1993 | 58 % |
| 10/1/1993 | 57.8 % |
| 11/1/1993 | 58 % |
| 12/1/1993 | 57.8 % |
| 1/1/1994 | 57.8 % |
| 2/1/1994 | 57.9 % |
| 3/1/1994 | 58 % |
| 4/1/1994 | 58 % |
| 5/1/1994 | 58.3 % |
| 6/1/1994 | 58.3 % |
| 7/1/1994 | 58.5 % |
| 8/1/1994 | 58.5 % |
| 9/1/1994 | 58.7 % |
| 10/1/1994 | 58.6 % |
| 11/1/1994 | 59 % |
| 12/1/1994 | 58.9 % |
| 1/1/1995 | 58.9 % |
| 2/1/1995 | 58.8 % |
| 3/1/1995 | 58.9 % |
| 4/1/1995 | 58.7 % |
| 5/1/1995 | 58.6 % |
| 6/1/1995 | 58.6 % |
| 7/1/1995 | 58.6 % |
| 8/1/1995 | 58.6 % |
| 9/1/1995 | 58.7 % |
| 10/1/1995 | 58.7 % |
| 11/1/1995 | 58.5 % |
| 12/1/1995 | 58.6 % |
| 1/1/1996 | 58.6 % |
| 2/1/1996 | 58.7 % |
| 3/1/1996 | 58.5 % |
| 4/1/1996 | 58.6 % |
| 5/1/1996 | 58.6 % |
| 6/1/1996 | 58.5 % |
| 7/1/1996 | 58.5 % |
| 8/1/1996 | 58.5 % |
| 9/1/1996 | 58.3 % |
| 10/1/1996 | 58.2 % |
| 11/1/1996 | 58.3 % |
| 12/1/1996 | 58.3 % |
| 1/1/1997 | 58.6 % |
| 2/1/1997 | 58.5 % |
| 3/1/1997 | 58.6 % |
| 4/1/1997 | 58.5 % |
| 5/1/1997 | 58.8 % |
| 6/1/1997 | 58.9 % |
| 7/1/1997 | 59 % |
| 8/1/1997 | 59.3 % |
| 9/1/1997 | 59.3 % |
| 10/1/1997 | 59.3 % |
| 11/1/1997 | 59.3 % |
| 12/1/1997 | 59.4 % |
| 1/1/1998 | 59.3 % |
| 2/1/1998 | 59.4 % |
| 3/1/1998 | 59.5 % |
| 4/1/1998 | 59.6 % |
| 5/1/1998 | 59.6 % |
| 6/1/1998 | 59.6 % |
| 7/1/1998 | 59.8 % |
| 8/1/1998 | 59.9 % |
| 9/1/1998 | 60 % |
| 10/1/1998 | 60 % |
| 11/1/1998 | 60.1 % |
| 12/1/1998 | 60.1 % |
| 1/1/1999 | 60.3 % |
| 2/1/1999 | 60.3 % |
| 3/1/1999 | 60.3 % |
| 4/1/1999 | 60.4 % |
| 5/1/1999 | 60.5 % |
| 6/1/1999 | 60.5 % |
| 7/1/1999 | 60.7 % |
| 8/1/1999 | 60.7 % |
| 9/1/1999 | 60.7 % |
| 10/1/1999 | 60.8 % |
| 11/1/1999 | 60.9 % |
| 12/1/1999 | 61.1 % |
| 1/1/2000 | 61.2 % |
| 2/1/2000 | 61.2 % |
| 3/1/2000 | 61.3 % |
| 4/1/2000 | 61.3 % |
| 5/1/2000 | 61.3 % |
| 6/1/2000 | 61.3 % |
| 7/1/2000 | 61.2 % |
| 8/1/2000 | 61.2 % |
| 9/1/2000 | 61.3 % |
| 10/1/2000 | 61.3 % |
| 11/1/2000 | 61.4 % |
| 12/1/2000 | 61.5 % |
| 1/1/2001 | 61.4 % |
| 2/1/2001 | 61.3 % |
| 3/1/2001 | 61.2 % |
| 4/1/2001 | 61.3 % |
| 5/1/2001 | 61.3 % |
| 6/1/2001 | 61.1 % |
| 7/1/2001 | 61.1 % |
| 8/1/2001 | 61.1 % |
| 9/1/2001 | 61.1 % |
| 10/1/2001 | 61.1 % |
| 11/1/2001 | 61.1 % |
| 12/1/2001 | 60.9 % |
| 1/1/2002 | 61 % |
| 2/1/2002 | 61.1 % |
| 3/1/2002 | 61.3 % |
| 4/1/2002 | 61.4 % |
| 5/1/2002 | 61.6 % |
| 6/1/2002 | 61.7 % |
| 7/1/2002 | 61.8 % |
| 8/1/2002 | 62.1 % |
| 9/1/2002 | 62 % |
| 10/1/2002 | 62 % |
| 11/1/2002 | 62.1 % |
| 12/1/2002 | 62.3 % |
| 1/1/2003 | 62.3 % |
| 2/1/2003 | 62.5 % |
| 3/1/2003 | 62.5 % |
| 4/1/2003 | 62.3 % |
| 5/1/2003 | 62.2 % |
| 6/1/2003 | 62.3 % |
| 7/1/2003 | 62.4 % |
| 8/1/2003 | 62.3 % |
| 9/1/2003 | 62.3 % |
| 10/1/2003 | 62.5 % |
| 11/1/2003 | 62.6 % |
| 12/1/2003 | 62.7 % |
| 1/1/2004 | 62.7 % |
| 2/1/2004 | 62.6 % |
| 3/1/2004 | 62.6 % |
| 4/1/2004 | 62.7 % |
| 5/1/2004 | 62.7 % |
| 6/1/2004 | 62.7 % |
| 7/1/2004 | 62.7 % |
| 8/1/2004 | 62.6 % |
| 9/1/2004 | 62.7 % |
| 10/1/2004 | 62.7 % |
| 11/1/2004 | 62.7 % |
| 12/1/2004 | 62.7 % |
| 1/1/2005 | 62.7 % |
| 2/1/2005 | 62.7 % |
| 3/1/2005 | 62.6 % |
| 4/1/2005 | 62.6 % |
| 5/1/2005 | 62.5 % |
| 6/1/2005 | 62.6 % |
| 7/1/2005 | 62.6 % |
| 8/1/2005 | 62.7 % |
| 9/1/2005 | 62.6 % |
| 10/1/2005 | 62.7 % |
| 11/1/2005 | 62.7 % |
| 12/1/2005 | 62.6 % |
| 1/1/2006 | 62.7 % |
| 2/1/2006 | 62.7 % |
| 3/1/2006 | 62.9 % |
| 4/1/2006 | 62.9 % |
| 5/1/2006 | 63.1 % |
| 6/1/2006 | 62.9 % |
| 7/1/2006 | 62.9 % |
| 8/1/2006 | 62.8 % |
| 9/1/2006 | 62.8 % |
| 10/1/2006 | 62.8 % |
| 11/1/2006 | 62.8 % |
| 12/1/2006 | 63 % |
| 1/1/2007 | 63.1 % |
| 2/1/2007 | 63.2 % |
| 3/1/2007 | 63.2 % |
| 4/1/2007 | 63.1 % |
| 5/1/2007 | 63.1 % |
| 6/1/2007 | 63.2 % |
| 7/1/2007 | 63.4 % |
| 8/1/2007 | 63.4 % |
| 9/1/2007 | 63.4 % |
| 10/1/2007 | 63.5 % |
| 11/1/2007 | 63.5 % |
| 12/1/2007 | 63.5 % |
| 1/1/2008 | 63.5 % |
| 2/1/2008 | 63.6 % |
| 3/1/2008 | 63.5 % |
| 4/1/2008 | 63.5 % |
| 5/1/2008 | 63.4 % |
| 6/1/2008 | 63.4 % |
| 7/1/2008 | 63.2 % |
| 8/1/2008 | 63.2 % |
| 9/1/2008 | 63.3 % |
| 10/1/2008 | 63.4 % |
| 11/1/2008 | 62.9 % |
| 12/1/2008 | 62.8 % |
| 1/1/2009 | 62.3 % |
| 2/1/2009 | 62 % |
| 3/1/2009 | 61.9 % |
| 4/1/2009 | 61.7 % |
| 5/1/2009 | 61.7 % |
| 6/1/2009 | 61.4 % |
| 7/1/2009 | 61.3 % |
| 8/1/2009 | 61.3 % |
| 9/1/2009 | 61.3 % |
| 10/1/2009 | 61.3 % |
| 11/1/2009 | 61.5 % |
| 12/1/2009 | 61.3 % |
| 1/1/2010 | 61.4 % |
| 2/1/2010 | 61.3 % |
| 3/1/2010 | 61.4 % |
| 4/1/2010 | 61.6 % |
| 5/1/2010 | 61.6 % |
| 6/1/2010 | 61.8 % |
| 7/1/2010 | 61.7 % |
| 8/1/2010 | 61.7 % |
| 9/1/2010 | 61.7 % |
| 10/1/2010 | 61.6 % |
| 11/1/2010 | 61.7 % |
| 12/1/2010 | 61.7 % |
| 1/1/2011 | 61.9 % |
| 2/1/2011 | 61.8 % |
| 3/1/2011 | 61.8 % |
| 4/1/2011 | 61.9 % |
| 5/1/2011 | 61.8 % |
| 6/1/2011 | 61.9 % |
| 7/1/2011 | 61.9 % |
| 8/1/2011 | 61.9 % |
| 9/1/2011 | 61.8 % |
| 10/1/2011 | 61.7 % |
| 11/1/2011 | 61.7 % |
| 12/1/2011 | 61.7 % |
| 1/1/2012 | 61.6 % |
| 2/1/2012 | 61.5 % |
| 3/1/2012 | 61.8 % |
| 4/1/2012 | 62 % |
| 5/1/2012 | 61.9 % |
| 6/1/2012 | 61.9 % |
| 7/1/2012 | 61.9 % |
| 8/1/2012 | 62 % |
| 9/1/2012 | 62.1 % |
| 10/1/2012 | 62.1 % |
| 11/1/2012 | 62.1 % |
| 12/1/2012 | 62.2 % |
| 1/1/2013 | 62.2 % |
| 2/1/2013 | 62.3 % |
| 3/1/2013 | 62 % |
| 4/1/2013 | 62.1 % |
| 5/1/2013 | 62.2 % |
| 6/1/2013 | 62.1 % |
| 7/1/2013 | 62 % |
| 8/1/2013 | 62 % |
| 9/1/2013 | 61.9 % |
| 10/1/2013 | 61.9 % |
| 11/1/2013 | 61.9 % |
| 12/1/2013 | 61.7 % |
| 1/1/2014 | 61.7 % |
| 2/1/2014 | 61.7 % |
| 3/1/2014 | 61.7 % |
| 4/1/2014 | 61.6 % |
| 5/1/2014 | 61.5 % |
| 6/1/2014 | 61.6 % |
| 7/1/2014 | 61.7 % |
| 8/1/2014 | 61.5 % |
| 9/1/2014 | 61.6 % |
| 10/1/2014 | 61.6 % |
| 11/1/2014 | 61.6 % |
| 12/1/2014 | 61.7 % |
| 1/1/2015 | 61.7 % |
| 2/1/2015 | 61.7 % |
| 3/1/2015 | 61.8 % |
| 4/1/2015 | 61.6 % |
| 5/1/2015 | 61.6 % |
| 6/1/2015 | 61.5 % |
| 7/1/2015 | 61.6 % |
| 8/1/2015 | 61.6 % |
| 9/1/2015 | 61.6 % |
| 10/1/2015 | 61.6 % |
| 11/1/2015 | 61.4 % |
| 12/1/2015 | 61.3 % |
| 1/1/2016 | 61.3 % |
| 2/1/2016 | 61.3 % |
| 3/1/2016 | 61.3 % |
| 4/1/2016 | 61.3 % |
| 5/1/2016 | 61.3 % |
| 6/1/2016 | 61.3 % |
| 7/1/2016 | 61.2 % |
| 8/1/2016 | 61.3 % |
| 9/1/2016 | 61.3 % |
| 10/1/2016 | 61.3 % |
| 11/1/2016 | 61.4 % |
| 12/1/2016 | 61.4 % |
| 1/1/2017 | 61.6 % |
| 2/1/2017 | 61.7 % |
| 3/1/2017 | 61.7 % |
| 4/1/2017 | 61.7 % |
| 5/1/2017 | 61.7 % |
| 6/1/2017 | 61.8 % |
| 7/1/2017 | 61.9 % |
| 8/1/2017 | 61.9 % |
| 9/1/2017 | 61.8 % |
| 10/1/2017 | 61.9 % |
| 11/1/2017 | 62 % |
| 12/1/2017 | 62.2 % |
| 1/1/2018 | 62 % |
| 2/1/2018 | 61.9 % |
| 3/1/2018 | 62 % |
| 4/1/2018 | 61.9 % |
| 5/1/2018 | 61.8 % |
| 6/1/2018 | 61.9 % |
| 7/1/2018 | 62.1 % |
| 8/1/2018 | 61.8 % |
| 9/1/2018 | 62 % |
| 10/1/2018 | 62 % |
| 11/1/2018 | 62.2 % |
| 12/1/2018 | 62.2 % |
| 1/1/2019 | 62.3 % |
| 2/1/2019 | 62.4 % |
| 3/1/2019 | 62.2 % |
| 4/1/2019 | 62.5 % |
| 5/1/2019 | 62.5 % |
| 6/1/2019 | 62.4 % |
| 7/1/2019 | 62.3 % |
| 8/1/2019 | 62.3 % |
| 9/1/2019 | 62.3 % |
| 10/1/2019 | 62.2 % |
| 11/1/2019 | 62 % |
| 12/1/2019 | 62.1 % |
| 1/1/2020 | 62.2 % |
| 2/1/2020 | 62.1 % |
| 3/1/2020 | 58.3 % |
| 4/1/2020 | 51.9 % |
| 5/1/2020 | 52.9 % |
| 6/1/2020 | 56.2 % |
| 7/1/2020 | 57.5 % |
| 8/1/2020 | 58.1 % |
| 9/1/2020 | 59.5 % |
| 10/1/2020 | 59.6 % |
| 11/1/2020 | 59.7 % |
| 12/1/2020 | 59.5 % |
| 1/1/2021 | 58.8 % |
| 2/1/2021 | 59.6 % |
| 3/1/2021 | 60.4 % |
| 4/1/2021 | 59.7 % |
| 5/1/2021 | 59.5 % |
| 6/1/2021 | 60.3 % |
| 7/1/2021 | 60.6 % |
| 8/1/2021 | 60.8 % |
| 9/1/2021 | 61.2 % |
| 10/1/2021 | 61.3 % |
| 11/1/2021 | 61.7 % |
| 12/1/2021 | 61.9 % |
| 1/1/2022 | 61.1 % |
| 2/1/2022 | 62.1 % |
| 3/1/2022 | 62.1 % |
| 4/1/2022 | 62.2 % |
| 5/1/2022 | 62.2 % |
| 6/1/2022 | 62.1 % |
| 7/1/2022 | 62.1 % |
| 8/1/2022 | 62 % |
| 9/1/2022 | 61.9 % |
| 10/1/2022 | 62 % |
| 11/1/2022 | 62.1 % |
| 12/1/2022 | 62.2 % |
| 1/1/2023 | 62.4 % |
| 2/1/2023 | 62.4 % |
| 3/1/2023 | 62.3 % |
| 4/1/2023 | 62.3 % |
| 5/1/2023 | 62.2 % |
| 6/1/2023 | 62.2 % |
| 7/1/2023 | 62 % |
| 8/1/2023 | 62 % |
| 9/1/2023 | 62 % |
| 10/1/2023 | 61.9 % |
| 11/1/2023 | 61.8 % |
| 12/1/2023 | 61.7 % |
| 1/1/2024 | 61.6 % |
| 2/1/2024 | 61.5 % |
| 3/1/2024 | 61.4 % |
| 4/1/2024 | 61.4 % |
| 5/1/2024 | 61.3 % |
| 6/1/2024 | 61.1 % |
| 7/1/2024 | 60.9 % |
| 8/1/2024 | 60.8 % |
Employment Rate History
| Date | Value |
|---|---|
| 8/1/2024 | 60.8 % |
| 7/1/2024 | 60.9 % |
| 6/1/2024 | 61.1 % |
| 5/1/2024 | 61.3 % |
| 4/1/2024 | 61.4 % |
| 3/1/2024 | 61.4 % |
| 2/1/2024 | 61.5 % |
| 1/1/2024 | 61.6 % |
| 12/1/2023 | 61.7 % |
| 11/1/2023 | 61.8 % |
Similar Macro Indicators to Employment Rate
| Name | Current | Previous | Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
🇨🇦 Average Hourly Earnings | 36.01 CAD | 35.77 CAD | Monthly |
🇨🇦 Average Weekly Earnings | 1,235.68 CAD | 1,230.05 CAD | Monthly |
🇨🇦 Employed persons | 20.582 M | 20.536 M | Monthly |
🇨🇦 Employment Change | 26,700 | 90,400 | Monthly |
🇨🇦 Full-time employment | -35,600 | 40,100 | Monthly |
🇨🇦 Job Opportunities | 646,365 | 737,555 | Quarter |
🇨🇦 Labor costs | 133.625 points | 132.619 points | Quarter |
🇨🇦 Labor force participation rate | 65.4 % | 65.4 % | Monthly |
🇨🇦 Minimum Wages | 17.2 CAD/Hour | 16.55 CAD/Hour | Annually |
🇨🇦 Non-farm Payrolls | 18.156 M | 18.105 M | Monthly |
🇨🇦 Part-time work | -65,300 | 65,700 | Monthly |
🇨🇦 Population | 40.8 M | 39.293 M | Annually |
🇨🇦 Productivity | 99.96 points | 100.23 points | Quarter |
🇨🇦 Retirement Age Men | 65 Years | 65 Years | Annually |
🇨🇦 Retirement Age Women | 65 Years | 65 Years | Annually |
🇨🇦 Unemployed Persons | 1.399 M | 1.407 M | Monthly |
🇨🇦 Unemployment Rate | 6.5 % | 6.6 % | Monthly |
🇨🇦 Wage Growth | 3.7 % | 4.2 % | Monthly |
🇨🇦 Wages | 31.23 CAD/Hour | 30.92 CAD/Hour | Monthly |
🇨🇦 Wages in Manufacturing | 30.46 CAD/Hour | 30.64 CAD/Hour | Monthly |
🇨🇦 Youth Unemployment Rate | 13.5 % | 14.5 % | Monthly |
In Canada, the employment rate quantifies the proportion of individuals within the working-age population who are employed.
Macro pages for other countries in America
- 🇦🇷Argentina
- 🇦🇼Aruba
- 🇧🇸Bahamas
- 🇧🇧Barbados
- 🇧🇿Belize
- 🇧🇲Bermuda
- 🇧🇴Bolivia
- 🇧🇷Brazil
- 🇰🇾Cayman Islands
- 🇨🇱Chile
- 🇨🇴Colombia
- 🇨🇷Costa Rica
- 🇨🇺Cuba
- 🇩🇴Dominican Republic
- 🇪🇨Ecuador
- 🇸🇻El Salvador
- 🇬🇹Guatemala
- 🇬🇾Guyana
- 🇭🇹Haiti
- 🇭🇳Honduras
- 🇯🇲Jamaica
- 🇲🇽Mexico
- 🇳🇮Nicaragua
- 🇵🇦Panama
- 🇵🇾Paraguay
- 🇵🇪Peru
- 🇵🇷Puerto Rico
- 🇸🇷Suriname
- 🇹🇹Trinidad and Tobago
- 🇺🇸United States
- 🇺🇾Uruguay
- 🇻🇪Venezuela
- 🇦🇬Antigua and Barbuda
- 🇩🇲Dominica
- 🇬🇩Grenada
What is Employment Rate?
Employment Rate: A Comprehensive Exploration The employment rate is a crucial macroeconomic indicator that reflects the proportion of the working-age population that is currently employed. As a pivotal measure, it offers deep insights into the economic health and labor market dynamics of a country. At Eulerpool, we strive to provide comprehensive and precise macroeconomic data, and understanding the employment rate is fundamental for businesses, policymakers, and economists alike. Understanding the Employment Rate In essence, the employment rate is calculated by dividing the number of employed individuals by the total working-age population and multiplying the result by 100 to express it as a percentage. This metric is vital for gauging the ability of an economy to generate jobs and absorb its labor force, thereby impacting economic growth, wage levels, and overall economic stability. Economic Implications of the Employment Rate Changes in the employment rate can have profound implications across various sectors of the economy. A rising employment rate usually signifies robust economic activity, increasing consumer spending, and improving business confidence. Conversely, a declining employment rate may indicate economic stagnation or recession, leading to reduced consumer spending, lower business profits, and potentially higher government expenditure on social welfare programs. Labor Market Dynamics The employment rate is a reflection of the underlying labor market dynamics. A high employment rate generally indicates a tight labor market, where the demand for labor meets or exceeds supply. This scenario can lead to upward pressure on wages, as employers compete to attract and retain workers. On the other hand, a low employment rate suggests a slack labor market, characterized by an excess supply of labor relative to demand. This condition often results in stagnant or declining wages, as job seekers outnumber available positions. Influences on Employment Rate Several factors influence the employment rate. Economic growth is a primary driver, as periods of robust economic expansion typically lead to job creation and higher employment. Demographic factors, such as the age composition of the population, migration trends, and labor force participation rates, also play significant roles. Additionally, government policies, including labor market regulations, tax policies, and social welfare programs, can have substantial impacts on employment rates. Sectoral Employment Trends Analyzing employment rates by sector provides valuable insights into the structural changes within an economy. Sectors such as technology, healthcare, and education often exhibit higher employment growth rates, reflecting shifts towards a knowledge-based economy. Conversely, traditional manufacturing and agricultural sectors may experience relative declines in employment due to automation and technological advancements. Understanding these sectoral trends is critical for formulating targeted economic policies and workforce development strategies. Unemployment Rate vs. Employment Rate It is essential to distinguish between the employment rate and the unemployment rate, another commonly referenced labor market indicator. While the employment rate measures the proportion of the working-age population that is employed, the unemployment rate assesses the percentage of the labor force that is actively seeking employment but is currently unemployed. Both metrics provide complementary perspectives on the labor market's health, with the employment rate offering a broader view of overall job market conditions. Policy Implications The employment rate is a key consideration for policymakers. High employment rates are often associated with economic prosperity and social stability. Consequently, governments aim to implement policies that promote job creation, enhance labor market flexibility, and support workforce development. Measures such as tax incentives for businesses, investment in education and training programs, and infrastructure development are commonly employed to stimulate employment growth. Impacts of Technological Change Technological advancements present both opportunities and challenges for employment rates. Automation and artificial intelligence can lead to job displacement in certain sectors while creating new opportunities in others. Policymakers and businesses must anticipate and manage these transitions to ensure that workers can adapt to changing labor market demands. Investment in continuous education and skill development is vital to maintaining high employment rates in an increasingly technology-driven economy. Global Comparisons Comparing employment rates across countries can provide valuable insights into different economic structures and policy approaches. Countries with high employment rates often have well-developed education systems, robust social safety nets, and dynamic business environments. These factors contribute to a more resilient labor market capable of adapting to economic shocks and structural changes. Conversely, countries struggling with low employment rates may face challenges such as inadequate education systems, rigid labor market regulations, or economic instability. Long-term Trends Long-term trends in employment rates can reveal significant shifts in an economy's structural composition and labor market dynamics. Analyzing historical data helps identify patterns and cyclicality in employment rates, providing insights into how economies respond to various economic shocks and policy interventions. For instance, the shift from manufacturing-based economies to service-oriented ones has had profound implications for employment rates and job quality. Conclusion The employment rate is a fundamental indicator of economic health and labor market conditions. At Eulerpool, we recognize the importance of accurate and comprehensive macroeconomic data in informing business decisions, policy formulation, and economic analysis. Understanding the employment rate's intricacies, influences, and implications is essential for stakeholders across the economic spectrum. As technological advancements, demographic shifts, and policy changes continue to shape labor markets globally, staying informed about employment rate trends will be crucial for navigating the complexities of the modern economy. By providing detailed and reliable macroeconomic data, Eulerpool aims to empower users with the knowledge needed to drive informed decisions and foster economic growth.