Access the world's leading financial data and tools
Subscribe for $2 Japan Price to Rent Ratio
Price
The current value of the Price to Rent Ratio in Japan is 130.538 . The Price to Rent Ratio in Japan increased to 130.538 on 12/1/2023, after it was 129.502 on 9/1/2023. From 3/1/1970 to 3/1/2024, the average GDP in Japan was 127.93 . The all-time high was reached on 3/1/1991 with 190.92 , while the lowest value was recorded on 6/1/2009 with 91.09 .
Price to Rent Ratio ·
3 years
5 years
10 years
25 Years
Max
Price-Rent Ratio | |
---|---|
3/1/1970 | 104.96 |
6/1/1970 | 108.06 |
9/1/1970 | 112.33 |
12/1/1970 | 113.99 |
3/1/1971 | 116.09 |
6/1/1971 | 118.34 |
9/1/1971 | 119.93 |
12/1/1971 | 121.53 |
3/1/1972 | 123.53 |
6/1/1972 | 126.89 |
9/1/1972 | 129.5 |
12/1/1972 | 140.06 |
3/1/1973 | 148.36 |
6/1/1973 | 155.64 |
9/1/1973 | 160.99 |
12/1/1973 | 161.6 |
3/1/1974 | 158.71 |
6/1/1974 | 155.14 |
9/1/1974 | 151.33 |
12/1/1974 | 143.83 |
3/1/1975 | 136.67 |
6/1/1975 | 134.46 |
9/1/1975 | 131.74 |
12/1/1975 | 130.25 |
3/1/1976 | 128.2 |
6/1/1976 | 125.85 |
9/1/1976 | 123.47 |
12/1/1976 | 122.33 |
3/1/1977 | 121.02 |
6/1/1977 | 119.7 |
9/1/1977 | 118.62 |
12/1/1977 | 118.17 |
3/1/1978 | 118.18 |
6/1/1978 | 117.8 |
9/1/1978 | 117.85 |
12/1/1978 | 118.29 |
3/1/1979 | 119.44 |
6/1/1979 | 121.73 |
9/1/1979 | 123.25 |
12/1/1979 | 125.3 |
3/1/1980 | 127.03 |
6/1/1980 | 128.93 |
9/1/1980 | 130.39 |
12/1/1980 | 132.34 |
3/1/1981 | 134.56 |
6/1/1981 | 137.09 |
9/1/1981 | 140.52 |
12/1/1981 | 142.26 |
3/1/1982 | 143.94 |
6/1/1982 | 144.73 |
9/1/1982 | 145.94 |
12/1/1982 | 146.78 |
3/1/1983 | 147.33 |
6/1/1983 | 147.6 |
9/1/1983 | 147.77 |
12/1/1983 | 147.72 |
3/1/1984 | 148.12 |
6/1/1984 | 148.42 |
9/1/1984 | 148.26 |
12/1/1984 | 148.35 |
3/1/1985 | 148.13 |
6/1/1985 | 147.92 |
9/1/1985 | 147.87 |
12/1/1985 | 147.63 |
3/1/1986 | 147.82 |
6/1/1986 | 148.09 |
9/1/1986 | 148.36 |
12/1/1986 | 149.81 |
3/1/1987 | 151.43 |
6/1/1987 | 154.76 |
9/1/1987 | 158.2 |
12/1/1987 | 158.93 |
3/1/1988 | 159.83 |
6/1/1988 | 160.58 |
9/1/1988 | 161.76 |
12/1/1988 | 163.03 |
3/1/1989 | 164.9 |
6/1/1989 | 166.37 |
9/1/1989 | 169.1 |
12/1/1989 | 174.26 |
3/1/1990 | 179.47 |
6/1/1990 | 184.51 |
9/1/1990 | 189.45 |
12/1/1990 | 190.1 |
3/1/1991 | 190.92 |
6/1/1991 | 189.38 |
9/1/1991 | 187.08 |
12/1/1991 | 183.78 |
3/1/1992 | 180.73 |
6/1/1992 | 176.19 |
9/1/1992 | 172.42 |
12/1/1992 | 169.01 |
3/1/1993 | 165.77 |
6/1/1993 | 163.38 |
9/1/1993 | 160.98 |
12/1/1993 | 158.97 |
3/1/1994 | 157.31 |
6/1/1994 | 155.84 |
9/1/1994 | 154.33 |
12/1/1994 | 153.08 |
3/1/1995 | 151.21 |
6/1/1995 | 149.64 |
9/1/1995 | 148.34 |
12/1/1995 | 147.1 |
3/1/1996 | 145.84 |
6/1/1996 | 144.9 |
9/1/1996 | 144 |
12/1/1996 | 143.12 |
3/1/1997 | 142.42 |
6/1/1997 | 140.86 |
9/1/1997 | 140.03 |
12/1/1997 | 139.37 |
3/1/1998 | 138.59 |
6/1/1998 | 138.66 |
9/1/1998 | 138.37 |
12/1/1998 | 137.41 |
3/1/1999 | 136.39 |
6/1/1999 | 135.13 |
9/1/1999 | 133.97 |
12/1/1999 | 132.92 |
3/1/2000 | 131.87 |
6/1/2000 | 130.65 |
9/1/2000 | 129.33 |
12/1/2000 | 128 |
3/1/2001 | 127.01 |
6/1/2001 | 125.86 |
9/1/2001 | 124.48 |
12/1/2001 | 122.98 |
3/1/2002 | 121.36 |
6/1/2002 | 119.91 |
9/1/2002 | 118.32 |
12/1/2002 | 116.67 |
3/1/2003 | 114.94 |
6/1/2003 | 113.1 |
9/1/2003 | 111.39 |
12/1/2003 | 109.69 |
3/1/2004 | 108 |
6/1/2004 | 106.52 |
9/1/2004 | 105.13 |
12/1/2004 | 103.92 |
3/1/2005 | 102.71 |
6/1/2005 | 101.48 |
9/1/2005 | 100.36 |
12/1/2005 | 99.79 |
3/1/2006 | 98.92 |
6/1/2006 | 98.21 |
9/1/2006 | 97.48 |
12/1/2006 | 97.69 |
3/1/2007 | 97.41 |
6/1/2007 | 97.37 |
9/1/2007 | 96.96 |
12/1/2007 | 97.29 |
3/1/2008 | 96.88 |
6/1/2008 | 100.18 |
9/1/2008 | 97.9 |
12/1/2008 | 94.9 |
3/1/2009 | 92.08 |
6/1/2009 | 91.09 |
9/1/2009 | 91.76 |
12/1/2009 | 91.9 |
3/1/2010 | 92.97 |
6/1/2010 | 93.48 |
9/1/2010 | 93.42 |
12/1/2010 | 94.19 |
3/1/2011 | 93.97 |
6/1/2011 | 93.94 |
9/1/2011 | 94.09 |
12/1/2011 | 93.7 |
3/1/2012 | 93.87 |
6/1/2012 | 93.18 |
9/1/2012 | 93.19 |
12/1/2012 | 93.87 |
3/1/2013 | 93.72 |
6/1/2013 | 95.19 |
9/1/2013 | 95.96 |
12/1/2013 | 97.1 |
3/1/2014 | 96.9 |
6/1/2014 | 96.87 |
9/1/2014 | 97.39 |
12/1/2014 | 98.28 |
3/1/2015 | 99.39 |
6/1/2015 | 99.54 |
9/1/2015 | 100.47 |
12/1/2015 | 100.6 |
3/1/2016 | 101.04 |
6/1/2016 | 102.71 |
9/1/2016 | 102.64 |
12/1/2016 | 103.65 |
3/1/2017 | 105.17 |
6/1/2017 | 105.1 |
9/1/2017 | 105.57 |
12/1/2017 | 105.77 |
3/1/2018 | 106.93 |
6/1/2018 | 107.26 |
9/1/2018 | 107.61 |
12/1/2018 | 108.65 |
3/1/2019 | 109.42 |
6/1/2019 | 109.34 |
9/1/2019 | 108.97 |
12/1/2019 | 109.62 |
3/1/2020 | 108.81 |
6/1/2020 | 108.54 |
9/1/2020 | 108.82 |
12/1/2020 | 111.37 |
3/1/2021 | 112.53 |
6/1/2021 | 114.64 |
9/1/2021 | 117.77 |
12/1/2021 | 119.14 |
3/1/2022 | 122.7 |
6/1/2022 | 125.12 |
9/1/2022 | 126.88 |
12/1/2022 | 128.01 |
3/1/2023 | 128.37 |
6/1/2023 | 129.14 |
9/1/2023 | 129.5 |
12/1/2023 | 130.54 |
Price to Rent Ratio History
Date | Value |
---|---|
12/1/2023 | 130.538 |
9/1/2023 | 129.502 |
6/1/2023 | 129.143 |
3/1/2023 | 128.369 |
12/1/2022 | 128.013 |
9/1/2022 | 126.877 |
6/1/2022 | 125.115 |
3/1/2022 | 122.703 |
12/1/2021 | 119.14 |
9/1/2021 | 117.772 |
Similar Macro Indicators to Price to Rent Ratio
Name | Current | Previous | Frequency |
---|---|---|---|
🇯🇵 Construction Contracts | -19.7 % | 2.1 % | Monthly |
🇯🇵 Construction Starts YoY | -0.6 % | -5.1 % | Monthly |
🇯🇵 Homeownership Rate | 61.2 % | 61.7 % | Annually |
🇯🇵 Housing Index | 124.14 points | 123.45 points | Monthly |
🇯🇵 Housing starts | 68,548 Units | 66,819 Units | Monthly |
🇯🇵 Residential property prices | 2.76 % | 2.03 % | Quarter |
In Japan, the price to rent ratio is calculated by dividing the nominal house price index by the housing rent price index, as provided by Eulerpool.
Macro pages for other countries in Asia
- 🇨🇳China
- 🇮🇳India
- 🇮🇩Indonesia
- 🇸🇦Saudi Arabia
- 🇸🇬Singapore
- 🇰🇷South Korea
- 🇹🇷Turkey
- 🇦🇫Afghanistan
- 🇦🇲Armenia
- 🇦🇿Azerbaijan
- 🇧🇭Bahrain
- 🇧🇩Bangladesh
- 🇧🇹Bhutan
- 🇧🇳Brunei
- 🇰🇭Cambodia
- 🇹🇱East Timor
- 🇬🇪Georgia
- 🇭🇰Hong Kong
- 🇮🇷Iran
- 🇮🇶Iraq
- 🇮🇱Israel
- 🇯🇴Jordan
- 🇰🇿Kazakhstan
- 🇰🇼Kuwait
- 🇰🇬Kyrgyzstan
- 🇱🇦Laos
- 🇱🇧Lebanon
- 🇲🇴Macau
- 🇲🇾Malaysia
- 🇲🇻Maldives
- 🇲🇳Mongolia
- 🇲🇲Myanmar
- 🇳🇵Nepal
- 🇰🇵North Korea
- 🇴🇲Oman
- 🇵🇰Pakistan
- 🇵🇸Palestine
- 🇵🇭Philippines
- 🇶🇦Qatar
- 🇱🇰Sri Lanka
- 🇸🇾Syria
- 🇹🇼Taiwan
- 🇹🇯Tajikistan
- 🇹🇭Thailand
- 🇹🇲Turkmenistan
- 🇦🇪United Arab Emirates
- 🇺🇿Uzbekistan
- 🇻🇳Vietnam
- 🇾🇪Yemen
What is Price to Rent Ratio?
The Price-to-Rent Ratio: An Insight into Housing Market Dynamics As an essential indicator within the realm of macroeconomics, the Price-to-Rent Ratio encapsulates critical insights into the housing market's underlying dynamics. This comprehensive metric, featuring prominently on Eulerpool, reveals the comparative relationship between property purchase prices and annual rental incomes, offering both individuals and institutional investors a lens through which to assess the viability of real estate investments, housing affordability, and broader economic trends. At its core, the Price-to-Rent Ratio is calculated by dividing the cost of purchasing a property by the annual rental income that property generates. For instance, if a home is valued at $300,000 and it can yield an annual rent of $20,000, the price-to-rent ratio would be 15. This numerical expression, seemingly simple, belies its profound implications for market participants. From the perspective of potential homeowners, a lower price-to-rent ratio typically suggests that buying a home might be more financially advantageous compared to renting. Conversely, a higher ratio may indicate that renting is the more prudent choice. For instance, a region where the ratio significantly exceeds long-term historical averages might be in the throes of a housing bubble, signaling the necessity for caution among would-be buyers. On the investment front, the Price-to-Rent Ratio serves as a pivotal tool for real estate investors aiming to maximize returns. Properties in areas with favorable ratios might represent lucrative opportunities for positive cash flow and value appreciation. Investors often arbitrarily set thresholds to delineate 'good' investments—quite often, properties with ratios below 15 are deemed attractive, signaling higher rental yields relative to purchase prices. The utility of the price-to-rent ratio extends beyond individual buyer or investor decisions; it also functions as a barometer for broader economic health. Housing markets with persistently high ratios may reflect an overheated market susceptible to correction, which can have far-reaching consequences for economic stability. Monitoring these ratios thus becomes imperative for policymakers and economists, who endeavor to maintain balanced growth and prevent housing crises. In terms of temporal and geographical analysis, the price-to-rent ratio exhibits significant variability. Urban areas with high demand and limited supply tend to showcase elevated ratios, often as a byproduct of rapid population growth and economic expansion. In contrast, more stable or declining areas might reveal lower ratios, indicating balanced or contracting market conditions. The COVID-19 pandemic has further underscored the importance of the price-to-rent ratio as a metric. With significant fluctuations in both rental incomes and property values due to shifting work patterns, migration trends, and economic policies, the ratio has illustrated substantial volatility, influencing decisions at every market tier. As remote work became more prevalent, certain suburban and remote areas witnessed lower ratios, attracting both buyers and renters seeking more space and affordability compared to urban centers. Furthermore, international comparisons of the price-to-rent ratio can unveil disparities driven by unique economic, cultural, and regulatory environments. For instance, markets like New York, London, and Hong Kong are known for their high ratios, reinforced by their status as global financial hubs with significant foreign investment and restricted housing supply. In contrast, areas in developing economies might exhibit lower ratios, attributable to more favorable property prices relative to rents. It is imperative for stakeholders to consider the context in which the price-to-rent ratio is evaluated. For instance, a high ratio in a city known for its high standards of living, such as San Francisco, could still make financial sense due to factors like long-term appreciation and quality of life benefits. Additionally, the ratio must be interpreted alongside other economic indicators, such as income growth, interest rates, and employment statistics, to derive a comprehensive assessment of the market's condition. Additionally, the interplay between the price-to-rent ratio and inflation cannot be overlooked. Rising inflation tends to influence both property values and rental prices, though not uniformly. While property prices might adjust more gradually due to the relatively illiquid nature of real estate markets, rental prices can respond more swiftly to inflationary pressures. This discrepancy often causes fluctuations in the ratio, necessitating adaptive strategies among investors and policymakers. On Eulerpool, we provide in-depth, real-time data on the price-to-rent ratio across multiple jurisdictions, serving as an invaluable resource for informed decision-making. Our platform not only offers raw data but also contextualizes it within broader economic trends, ensuring that users can interpret these figures with a critical, analytical lens. Whether you are a homebuyer exploring the best time to purchase, an investor seeking to optimize your portfolio, or a policymaker aiming to gauge market stability, the tools and insights available on our platform can significantly enhance your understanding and strategy. In conclusion, the Price-to-Rent Ratio remains a cornerstone metric in the analysis of housing markets, offering salient insights that traverse individual, investment, and macroeconomic considerations. By meticulously monitoring and interpreting this ratio, stakeholders can navigate the complexities of real estate markets with a more informed, strategic approach. At Eulerpool, our commitment to providing precise and contextually rich data ensures that our users are equipped to make decisions that align with their financial goals and market expectations.