Eulerpool vs EODHD
A 500x larger free tier, fundamentals included instead of sold as add-ons, and native MCP for AI agents — without EODHD's per-day throttling.
Trusted by analysts and engineers at
Feature comparison
| Feature | Eulerpool | EODHD |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier available | ||
| 10,000 calls/month on free tier | ||
| Fundamentals included in base plans | ||
| MCP support for AI agents | ||
| Congress trading & insider data | ||
| Macro data (FRED, ECB, Eurostat, IMF) | ||
| EOD prices, global exchanges | ||
| Full financial statements | ||
| Earnings call transcripts | ||
| Official SDKs (Python, JS) | ||
| Usage-based overage (no hard cutoffs) |
Why choose Eulerpool over EODHD
10K calls/month free
vs 20 calls/day on EODHD free. Prototype a real application before paying.
One price, all data
Fundamentals, estimates, and alt data included — EODHD sells fundamentals as a paid add-on package.
MCP-native
Built for Claude, Cursor, and AI agents. EODHD has no MCP integration.
Alternative data
Congress trading, insider transactions, superinvestor 13Fs, short interest — datasets EODHD does not offer.
EODHD vs Eulerpool FAQ
“Eulerpool replaced three legacy data subscriptions in our equity research workflow. Migration took two days.”
“Point-in-time data quality rivals CRSP at a fraction of the cost. We run all backtests on Eulerpool now.”
“We migrated our entire data pipeline in 48 hours. The API is the cleanest I have worked with in finance.”